BEHIND THE SCREEN · B2/C1 · 50 min

Everything Everywhere All at Once

A tired mother discovers she is the only version of herself who can save every universe — if she can first reach the one person closest to her: her own daughter.

Today: you'll tell the story of Everything Everywhere All at Once — an exhausted laundromat owner who discovers she can tap into the skills of infinite parallel versions of herself to save the multiverse and reach her estranged daughter — uncover the real physics and philosophy hiding underneath the chaos, and master two conditionals that mix time frames: one that reaches from a past choice into how things stand today, and one that reaches from a present truth back into a moment in the past.
Before we begin — talk it through: Do you ever wonder what your life would look like if you'd made one different choice years ago? Is regret about the past, or about the life you're not living right now? And if you could meet a version of yourself who made completely different decisions, would you actually want to?

The words for today's story

Work through the four short activities. Each word is shown in a situation that gives its meaning away — no need to know the film yet. Say your answer out loud first, then reveal.

A. Infer from context — what does the bold word mean?

1. After years of the same commute, the same complaints, and the same paperwork, his job had become utterly mundane — one grey day dissolving into the next.
mundane (adj) — ordinary, dull and repetitive; lacking anything unusual or exciting.
2. She hadn't spoken to her estranged brother in over a decade; an old argument had split the family, and neither side had ever tried to make peace.
estranged (adj) — no longer close to or in contact with someone, usually because of a serious falling-out.
3. The small business owner dreaded the letter marked URGENT: the tax office was demanding a full audit of every receipt from the past three years.
an audit (n) — an official, detailed examination of financial accounts to check that everything is correct.
4. Caring for three young children while working two jobs had become a burden she carried alone, exhausting and impossible to put down.
a burden (n) — a heavy load; more often, a duty, responsibility or worry that weighs on someone.

B. Closest in meaning — which one is nearest?

5. futile is closest in meaning to: (a) pointless   (b) rewarding   (c) simple
(a) pointless — futile (adj) means having no effect or result; completely useless.
6. chaotic is closest in meaning to: (a) calm and ordered   (b) wild and disorganised   (c) quiet and slow
(b) wild and disorganised — chaotic (adj) means in a state of complete confusion and disorder.

C. Which meaning fits? (choose a, b or c)

7. "Nothing I do matters, and nothing anyone else does matters either, so why bother trying?" Her nihilistic view of life left her cold and detached from everyone around her.
Nihilistic means: (a) believing life has no meaning or value at all; (b) believing everything happens for a good reason; (c) believing hard work always pays off in the end.
(a) — nihilistic (adj) — believing that life is without meaning, purpose or inherent value.
8. The sunset lasted only a few fleeting minutes before the colour drained from the sky and the ordinary grey of evening returned.
Fleeting means: (a) permanent and unchanging; (b) lasting only a very short time; (c) unusually bright.
(b) — fleeting (adj) — passing quickly; lasting only a moment.

D. Infer from context — two bigger ideas

9. After years apart, the two sisters finally sat down, apologised, and reconciled — deciding that whatever had once divided them mattered less than the years they had left together.
to reconcile (v) — to restore a friendly relationship between people after a disagreement; to settle a conflict.
10. Claiming he could win an Olympic medal without ever training for a single day was so absurd that his friends burst out laughing.
absurd (adj) — so unreasonable or illogical that it seems ridiculous.

Now use them — out loud

Talk it through before we watch:
  • Using nihilistic, chaotic and mundane, predict: what kind of story do you think mixes an utterly ordinary life with a battle against meaninglessness?
  • Which of these words feel hopeful, and which feel bleak? Sort them out loud and say why.

The film, in three parts

Daniel Kwan & Daniel Scheinert's Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022). Read each part, try the quick check from memory, then discuss. (There are spoilers ahead — that's the point; we're here to talk about it.)

Part 1 — A mundane life buried in paperwork

Evelyn Wang runs a struggling laundromat with her gentle, endlessly patient husband Waymond, who has just decided — quietly, almost apologetically — to file for divorce, though he can never quite find the moment to tell her. Evelyn is too busy: her ageing father, Gong Gong, has arrived from China expecting to see a successful daughter and a respectable family; her own daughter Joy is trying, again, to introduce her girlfriend Becky properly; and above it all hangs a summons from the tax office. Tonight, the family has an audit.

In the lift on the way up to face the auditor, Waymond suddenly changes: his eyes widen, his voice steadies, and a version of him from another universe takes over his body just long enough to tell Evelyn something impossible. There are infinite parallel universes, one for every choice she never made — and she, this exhausted, disappointing, laundromat-owning Evelyn, is the only version capable of stopping a catastrophe unravelling across all of them.

To fight, she must "verse-jump": performing strange, statistically near-impossible actions to borrow the skills and memories of other Evelyns — a movie star, a kung-fu master, a chef. Something, or someone, is destroying the agents sent to protect the multiverse, and it is heading straight for her audit.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What is happening in Evelyn's ordinary life at the start, and what does the alternate Waymond tell her in the lift?

2. How does Evelyn access the skills of other versions of herself?

1. Her marriage is quietly failing, her father expects a successful daughter, her own daughter wants acceptance, and the family faces a tax audit; in the lift, an alternate Waymond reveals the multiverse and tells her she alone can stop a growing threat.

2. By "verse-jumping" — performing strange, statistically improbable actions that let her briefly borrow another universe's Evelyn's skills and memories.

Discuss:
  • Alpha-Waymond calls this exact Evelyn — tired, unaccomplished, still running a small laundromat — the one who can save everything, precisely because her life went "wrong." Do failures and disappointments ever turn out to be a kind of hidden strength?

Part 2 — The daughter who has felt everything

The enemy has a name, Jobu Tupaki, and a shocking identity: she is Joy, Evelyn's own daughter, from a universe where an experiment pushed her across so many lives, so fast, that her sense of a single self shattered. Having lived every possible experience at once, Jobu has arrived at a conclusion that feels, to her, like simple mathematics: if you have done everything, nothing can matter, and nothing is worth wanting.

To prove it, she has built something monstrous out of the most mundane object imaginable — an everything bagel, piled with every topping, every regret, every possibility, folded in on itself until it becomes a black hole that can swallow all existence. Alpha-verse agents want Evelyn to hunt Jobu down and stop her before she steps into it and takes everything with her.

The fight spills across universes both ridiculous and dazzling — a world where fingers are hot dogs, a world where humans never evolved beyond googly-eyed rocks, a world where Evelyn became the film star she once dreamed of being, with a devoted, elegant Waymond at her side. In each one, chaos and comedy sit beside something achingly sad: a mother chasing a daughter she has never really seen.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. Who is Jobu Tupaki really, and how did she come to believe nothing matters?

2. What has she built, and what is Evelyn asked to do about it?

1. She is Joy, Evelyn's daughter, pushed by an experiment across so many lives at once that everything blurred into meaninglessness for her.

2. An "everything bagel" that can destroy all universes at once; Evelyn is asked to find and stop her, by force if necessary.

Discuss:
  • Jobu's despair comes from having tried everything and felt nothing hold together. Do you think experiencing more of life makes it feel more meaningful — or could having every option actually make meaning harder to find?

Part 3 — Two rocks, and a choice

In one quiet, near-wordless universe, Evelyn and Joy exist only as two rocks side by side on a hillside, their thoughts appearing only as subtitles. Stripped of chaos and bodies, Evelyn feels, for a moment, the pull of her daughter's nihilism: perhaps nothing does matter, and the easiest thing would be to stop trying.

But Evelyn chooses otherwise. Facing enemies across a dozen universes — the tax auditor, cruel alternate selves, and finally Jobu herself — she stops fighting and starts being kind instead, echoing something Waymond told her at the very start: that in a universe of chaos, being kind, especially when you don't have to be, might be the only thing that makes any sense.

She finds Jobu, and instead of a weapon, she offers acceptance — of Joy, of Becky, of a daughter she never fully saw. It doesn't erase the multiverse's chaos or fix the family instantly, but it is enough. The film ends back where it started: in the same small, mundane laundromat, the same unresolved tax bill on the counter — except that everything between them now feels, quietly, different.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What almost happens to Evelyn in the "two rocks" universe, and what stops her?

2. How does Evelyn finally reach Jobu Tupaki — and where does the story end?

1. She almost gives in to nihilism, feeling that nothing matters; she pulls back and chooses kindness instead, following Waymond's philosophy.

2. Through acceptance and love rather than violence; the film ends back in the ordinary laundromat, the family's problems unresolved but their relationships changed.

Discuss:
  • Waymond argues that in a universe of chaos and confusion, kindness is a conscious, almost strategic choice — not weakness. Do you agree that kindness can be the strongest response to meaninglessness, or is that too easy an answer?

Grammar — Mixed Conditionals

No film needs mixed conditionals more than a story about a woman confronting every version of the life she might have had. Regular conditionals keep one time frame; mixed conditionals deliberately cross two — a past cause explaining a present state, or a present truth explaining a past outcome.

The two mixed structures:
• past condition → present result: if + had + past participle, would/wouldn't + base verb — a past choice or fact explains a state that is still true now: "If Evelyn had followed a completely different path all those years ago, she wouldn't be standing behind this counter today." "If Joy hadn't been pushed across so many lives at once, she wouldn't see the world as meaningless now."
• present condition → past result: if + past simple, would/wouldn't have + past participle — an ongoing truth about someone explains why something did or didn't happen in the past: "If Evelyn weren't so afraid of her father's disappointment, she would have stood up for Joy years ago." "If the multiverse agents didn't believe violence solves everything, they would have tried kindness long before now."
Feel the difference:
• the if-clause with had done always points back to a finished past event; the if-clause with the past simple describes an ongoing truth.
• the result clause tells you when the effect lands: would + base = the effect is still true now; would have + past participle = the effect landed in the past and is already finished.

1. Past choice, present result — complete with would(n't) + base verb

Read the meaning in brackets and complete the sentence.

1. If Joy had never been pushed across every possible version of herself, she (not / see) reality as one big meaningless joke. (true now)

2. If Waymond had stopped being patient with Evelyn decades ago, they (not / still / be) married today. (true now)

3. If Gong Gong had approved of Waymond from the very beginning, Evelyn's relationship with her father (be) far less strained right now. (true now)

1. wouldn't see (past condition, effect still true now)

2. wouldn't still be (past condition, effect still true now)

3. would be (past condition, effect still true now)

2. Present truth, past result — complete with would(n't) have + past participle

Read the meaning in brackets and complete the sentence.

1. If Evelyn weren't so afraid of disappointing her father, she (introduce) Joy's girlfriend properly years ago. (past result)

2. If Jobu Tupaki didn't feel completely alone in everything she had experienced, she (not / build) the everything bagel in the first place. (past result)

3. If the agents weren't so certain that force was the only answer, they (try) kindness long before Evelyn arrived. (past result)

1. would have introduced (present truth, past result)

2. wouldn't have built (present truth, past result)

3. would have tried (present truth, past result)

3. Complete the passage — mix both patterns

Fill each gap with the correct mixed-conditional form. Read it aloud when you're done.

If Evelyn (not / spend) her whole life saying yes to everyone else, she might actually feel free by now. And if she weren't so used to running from her problems, she (face) her marriage and her daughter's pain long before either of them exploded across the multiverse. As Waymond likes to say: if people (be) a little kinder to each other from the start, so much of this chaos would never have been necessary.

hadn't spent · would have faced · had been

Notice the pattern: a past cause that still shapes today uses if + had done, would + base; a present truth that shaped the past uses if + past simple, would have + done.

Carry both patterns into the Speak tab: the film's whole tragedy and its whole hope live in these two directions — what a past choice explains about today, and what a present truth explains about the past.

The Real Story — how much of this is true?

Underneath the hot-dog fingers and the googly-eyed rocks, Everything Everywhere All at Once is built on three real things: a genuine, if speculative, idea in physics; a serious philosophical debate; and an entirely true story about immigrant family life.

🌌 The multiverse is a real idea in physics — but it isn't proven

The film's central gimmick — countless parallel universes branching off from every choice — echoes a genuine, serious idea in physics: the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, proposed by the American physicist Hugh Everett in 1957. Everett argued that when a quantum event has several possible outcomes, reality doesn't collapse into just one of them — instead, the universe "splits," and every outcome happens, each in its own separate branch. Separately, some cosmologists have proposed a "multiverse" arising from theories like eternal inflation, in which our own Big Bang was only one of countless "bubble" universes. Both ideas are taken seriously by some physicists and philosophers of science — but neither is proven, neither can currently be tested, and neither is accepted by all scientists. It's real, published physics; it is not established fact, and it may never be.

The "everything bagel" has a name: nihilism

Jobu Tupaki's despair dramatizes a real philosophical position: nihilism, the view that life has no inherent meaning, value or purpose. The film sets nihilism against a different, more hopeful tradition: absurdism, most closely associated with the French-Algerian philosopher Albert Camus. In his 1942 essay The Myth of Sisyphus, Camus argued that the universe truly is indifferent and meaningless — but that giving up, or pretending otherwise, are both mistakes. Instead, he said, we should recognise the absence of meaning and choose, anyway, to act, to care, and to find our own reasons to keep going.

Evelyn's answer — meeting her daughter's void with deliberate kindness rather than violence or despair — is a fairly precise dramatization of Camus's "revolt": not solving meaninglessness, but responding to it with a chosen act of love. The film doesn't claim the universe has a purpose. It claims that you get to choose what matters to you inside it, even if — especially if — nothing was ever guaranteed to matter at all.

The real story underneath — and a historic night at the Oscars

Beneath the multiverse, the film tells an ordinary, true-to-life story: a Chinese immigrant family running a small, exhausting business, caught between a homeland's expectations and a new country's demands, an ageing parent's disapproval, a marriage worn thin by decades of grinding work, and a daughter whose identity her mother struggles fully to accept. Directors Dan Kwan and Daniel Scheinert (credited together as "the Daniels") built the multiverse chaos around this very grounded, very common story of generational and cultural strain.

The film's impact was historic, and entirely real: at the 2023 Academy Awards, Everything Everywhere All at Once won seven Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Original Screenplay. Michelle Yeoh became the first Asian actress to win Best Actress; Ke Huy Quan (who plays Waymond) won Best Supporting Actor decades after leaving acting behind; and Jamie Lee Curtis won Best Supporting Actress. The laundromat and the audit are invented; the ache of an immigrant family trying to hold itself together is not.

Take these into the discussion:
  • Before this lesson, did you know the multiverse idea comes from real, published physics — or did you assume it was pure science fiction?
  • Does it change how you read the ending, knowing the "everything bagel" dramatizes a real philosophical position rather than being invented from nothing?
  • Camus said the right response to a meaningless universe is neither despair nor denial, but action anyway. Do you find that convincing, or does it dodge the problem?

Speak

This is the heart of the lesson — do it all out loud. The timer keeps you going; fill the time with detail.

Useful language: reach for today's grammar to talk about roads not taken — mixed conditionals ("if she hadn't married so young, she wouldn't be running this laundromat now"; "if he weren't so patient, he would have left years ago"). For opinions: "What's striking is…", "You could argue that…", "On one level… but on another…".
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Tell the story (4 minutes)

Tell the story of Everything Everywhere All at Once in your own words, as if to someone who has never seen it. Move through the arc: the mundane life buried in paperwork and family tension → the lift, the multiverse, and the call to fight → Jobu Tupaki revealed as Joy, and the everything bagel → the chaotic battles across strange universes → the two rocks, the choice, and the return to an ordinary laundromat that finally feels different.

Work in at least five key words (mundane, estranged, audit, burden, futile, chaotic, nihilistic, fleeting, reconcile, absurd), and use mixed conditionals at the turning points: "if Joy hadn't been pushed across every possible life, she wouldn't see the world as meaningless now."

Task B · Nothing matters — so what? (4 minutes)

Jobu Tupaki's despair rests on one claim: if you could do everything, nothing would be worth doing. Evelyn's answer is to choose kindness anyway. Build an argument: if nothing you did mattered in any lasting, cosmic sense, would kindness still be worth choosing — or is meaning only worth pursuing if it's real and permanent? Bring in examples beyond the film if you can.

Task C · A broader question (4 minutes)

Choose one of these and run with it — or make your own case about meaning, choice and family.

Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it:

  • Whether learning that "the multiverse" is a real, if unproven, idea in physics changes how you imagine your own unmade choices.
  • A decision in your own life that once felt like "the one true path," but that you now see differently.
  • A film, book or story that mixes something absurd or silly with something deeply emotional, the way this one does.
  • Whether growing up between two cultures or two generations creates a particular kind of pressure — on you, or on someone you know.
  • A relationship you've had to work to reconcile after a period of real distance.
  • Whether achieving literally everything would make a person happier, or emptier.

To finish — the bigger questions

  1. The film's real subject isn't the multiverse — it's the ordinary weight of a tired, unresolved family. What in your own life gets hidden underneath more "exciting" problems?
  2. Evelyn is chosen to save everything precisely because her life is full of failures and unfinished business. Do you think an "ordinary," disappointing life can be a hidden strength?
  3. Camus argued we should act as if things matter, even without proof that they do. Is that wisdom, or self-deception?
  4. Before you go — from memory: give one sentence using if + past perfect … would + base (past condition, present result) and one using if + past simple … would have + past participle (present condition, past result) about your own life, and explain why each fits.