BEHIND THE SCREEN · B2/C1 · 50 min

Hidden Figures

Three Black women's genius helped win the Space Race — while their own country ruled where they could sit, eat and use the bathroom. Almost all of it really happened.

Today: you'll tell the story of Hidden Figures — three brilliant Black women mathematicians who help launch America into space while their own workplace tells them where they may sit, eat and go to the bathroom — discover how much of it truly happened, and master how English talks about the rules of the past: what people had to do, were and weren't allowed to do, couldn't do, and were made to do.
Before we begin — talk it through: Have you ever felt that people doubted your ability before they'd even seen your work — because of how you looked, where you were from, or your gender? Can you think of a rule, in any country, that used to separate groups of people and has since been abolished? Do you think talent alone is ever enough to beat an unfair system?

The words for today's story

Work through the four short activities. Each word is shown in a situation that gives its meaning away — no need to know the film yet. Say your answer out loud first, then reveal.

A. Infer from context — what does the bold word mean?

1. The young accountant was so meticulous that she checked every figure three times, tracing each number back to its source before she would trust it on the final page.
meticulous (adj) — extremely careful and thorough, paying close attention to every small detail.
2. In the small town, the schools, the buses and even the drinking fountains were segregated — one set for one group of people, a separate, inferior set kept for another.
segregated (adj) — kept apart from another group, especially by race, under an official system or rule.
3. Being made to eat standing at the back of the shop while others sat in comfort was just one more daily indignity she had learned to swallow, a small humiliation stacked on top of many others.
an indignity (n) — an act or situation that makes someone feel disrespected, embarrassed or less than fully human.
4. Even as a child she showed a prodigious gift for numbers, solving equations on the blackboard that left grown mathematicians scratching their heads.
prodigious (adj) — remarkably or impressively great in ability, size or degree.

B. Closest in meaning — which one is nearest?

5. tenacity is closest in meaning to: (a) laziness   (b) stubborn persistence   (c) forgetfulness
(b) stubborn persistence — tenacity (n) means the quality of holding firmly to a course of action and refusing to give up.
6. formidable is closest in meaning to: (a) impressively powerful   (b) friendly and warm   (c) small and unimportant
(a) impressively powerful — formidable (adj) describes someone or something so capable that it inspires respect, or even a little fear.

C. Which meaning fits? (choose a, b or c)

7. The new manager spoke to her in a condescending tone, as if she were a child who couldn't possibly follow the numbers on the page.
To be condescending is: (a) to speak to someone as an equal; (b) to talk down to someone as if they were inferior; (c) to whisper so no one else can hear.
(b) — condescending (adj) — treating someone as if they were less intelligent or important than you.
8. Everyone doubted her calculation — until the rocket followed her numbers exactly and vindicated every figure she had written.
To vindicate someone is: (a) to prove them wrong; (b) to prove them right after doubt or blame; (c) to punish them.
(b) — to vindicate (v) — to show, with evidence, that someone was right or justified all along.

D. Infer from context — two bigger ideas

9. Her promotion was groundbreaking: no one who looked like her had ever held that title before, and every person who came after her walked through a door she had opened.
groundbreaking (adj) — new and important in a way that changes what is possible afterwards; the first of its kind.
10. Despite every obstacle placed in her path, she remained unyielding — she did not bend, did not slow down, and did not accept "no" as a final answer.
unyielding (adj) — refusing to give way, change or give up, even under great pressure.

Now use them — out loud

Talk it through before we watch:
  • Using meticulous, prodigious and unyielding, predict: what kind of women do you think this film is about?
  • Which of these ten words describe a person's character, and which describe a situation or a system? Sort them out loud and say why.

The film, in three parts

Theodore Melfi's Hidden Figures (2016), based on Margot Lee Shetterly's book. Read each part, try the quick check from memory, then discuss. (There are spoilers ahead — that's the point; we're here to talk about it.)

Part 1 — Three women, one segregated building

Virginia, 1961. At NASA's Langley Research Center, hundreds of women work as human "computers" — checking rocket calculations by hand, in the years before electronic machines can be fully trusted. Katherine Goble, Dorothy Vaughan and Mary Jackson are three of the sharpest minds among them. All three are Black, and all three work in the West Area Computing pool: a room segregated from the computers down the hall, with older equipment, and rules that reach into every corner of the day — a separate bathroom, a separate coffee pot, and library books they aren't allowed to borrow from the main section.

Dorothy has been doing a supervisor's job in every way but title and pay for years, yet the promotion never quite arrives. Mary has an engineer's eye for a wind-tunnel problem, but she needs special permission just to sit the night classes her qualification requires. And Katherine, brilliant at analytic geometry, is pulled onto the elite Space Task Group — the team racing to catch up with the Soviets and put an American into orbit.

On her first day there, she is the only woman, and the only Black engineer, in a room of white men who aren't sure what to make of her. And when she needs the bathroom, there isn't one for her anywhere in the building — the nearest one she's allowed to use is in a different building, half a mile away, so she has to run there and back in the rain to make it in time for the next meeting.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What work do Katherine, Dorothy and Mary do, and where?

2. What daily problem does Katherine face once she joins the Space Task Group?

1. They are mathematicians — "computers" — in NASA's segregated West Area Computing pool at Langley, Virginia.

2. There is no bathroom for her in her new building; she has to run half a mile to the nearest one she's allowed to use.

Discuss:
  • Katherine has to run half a mile through the rain for a bathroom that exists purely because of her race. What does a rule like this tell you about the wider society that created it — even if no single person intends to be cruel?

Part 2 — The clock the Soviets started

The pressure is real: the Soviet Union has already put a satellite, then a man, into orbit, and NASA is desperate to catch up. Katherine must check trajectory equations against an impossible deadline, but she isn't allowed into the briefings where the numbers she needs are actually discussed — those rooms are for senior engineers only, the door marked with a small barred window she can only look through. She works around it: memorising notes, reading over shoulders, refusing to hand back a problem unsolved.

Meanwhile Dorothy watches the new electronic IBM computer being installed and understands, faster than anyone else, what it means: the entire human computer pool — herself and every woman she effectively supervises — could be replaced overnight. No one is training her on the machine, so she teaches herself the coding language it runs on, FORTRAN, and quietly teaches her whole team, making them indispensable rather than obsolete.

And Mary, told for years that a Black woman couldn't become an engineer at NASA, finally gets the one thing standing in her way: permission. A judge rules that she may attend the previously all-white night school, and she pushes through the coursework, exhausted, on top of everything else already on her plate.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. Why can't Katherine simply attend the briefings she needs to do her job well?

2. What does Dorothy realise about the new IBM machine, and what does she do about it?

1. The briefings are restricted to senior engineers, and as a Black woman in the pool, she isn't permitted inside — she has to gather what she needs indirectly.

2. She realises it could replace the entire human computing pool; she teaches herself its programming language, FORTRAN, and teaches her team, so they stay essential.

Discuss:
  • All three women find a way around an unjust rule rather than waiting for it to be abolished — reading over a shoulder, teaching herself in secret, going to court for permission. Is quietly working around an unfair rule a form of defeat, or its own kind of victory?

Part 3 — "Get her to check the numbers"

By February 1962, the plan is for astronaut John Glenn to become the first American to orbit the Earth — three laps, at roughly 17,500 miles an hour, with re-entry calculations so precise that a small error could kill him. The new IBM computer runs the trajectory numbers, but before he'll climb into the capsule, Glenn gives one instruction: have Katherine check them by hand. If she says the numbers are good, he says, then he's ready to fly.

Katherine works through the equations herself, on paper, against the clock, and confirms every figure. Glenn's flight goes ahead and succeeds — three orbits, a safe splashdown, and a nation watching. In the months that follow, the invisible walls inside NASA start, slowly, to come down: Dorothy is finally made supervisor in title as well as fact; Mary completes her qualification and becomes a working engineer; and, eventually, the sign over the "coloured" bathroom door disappears for good.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What must be true before Glenn will agree to fly?

2. What changes for the three women by the end of the film?

1. Katherine must personally check the computer's trajectory numbers by hand and confirm they're correct.

2. Dorothy gets the supervisor title she has long deserved, Mary becomes a full engineer, and segregated facilities at the centre begin to disappear.

Discuss:
  • The film ends with quiet, gradual victories rather than one dramatic confrontation. Why might that be a more honest way to show progress against unjust rules than a single triumphant scene?

Grammar — past obligation, permission & prohibition

Almost every scene in Hidden Figures is shaped by a rule: something a character had to do, was or wasn't allowed to do, couldn't do, or was made to do. This is exactly the language English uses to describe the rules that governed the past.

Obligation and its absence:
• had to + verb — something was necessary: "Katherine had to check the trajectory numbers by hand, with no computer to help her."
• didn't have to + verb — something was not necessary: "After 1958, new engineers didn't have to sit in a separate room from their colleagues."
Permission and its refusal:
• was/were allowed to + verb — permission existed: "Dorothy was eventually allowed to use the title 'supervisor' — her title finally matched her job."
• wasn't/weren't allowed to + verb — permission was refused: "For years, the West Computers weren't allowed to borrow certain books from the main library."
Inability, and being forced:
• couldn't + verb — no ability or no permission existed, full stop: "Whatever Mary's talent, she couldn't sit the engineering exam without a course she wasn't permitted to take."
• was/were made to + verb — someone else forced the action: "Dorothy's whole team was made to work in a separate room, down the corridor from the main pool."
Feel the difference: didn't have to = free not to; wasn't allowed to = forbidden; was made to = forced by someone else; couldn't = blocked, whether by rule or circumstance.

1. Choose the form the meaning needs

Read the meaning in brackets and complete the sentence.

1. Katherine (run) half a mile in the rain whenever she needed the bathroom, because the closest one wasn't for her. (necessary)

2. Once the sign came down, employees (walk) all that way any more. (no longer necessary)

3. In 1958, Dorothy finally (use) the title "supervisor" that matched the work she'd been doing for years. (permission granted)

1. had to run (necessary — obligation)

2. didn't have to walk (no longer necessary)

3. was allowed to use (permission granted)

2. Fix the form

Each sentence has the right idea but the wrong form. Write the corrected verb phrase.

1. In many buildings, a Black engineer (share) the same coffee pot as her white colleagues. (forbidden)

2. Some of the most capable women in the computing pool (sit) apart from the engineers whose numbers they were checking. (forced by the rules of the building)

3. Whatever her results on paper, for years Mary simply (become) an engineer without that extra course. (no possibility existed)

1. wasn't allowed to share (forbidden)

2. were made to sit (forced by others)

3. couldn't become (no possibility)

3. Complete the story — mix all four forms

Fill each gap, then read the paragraph aloud.

On her first day with the Space Task Group, Katherine quickly learned the unwritten rules. She (have to / cross) the whole campus to reach a bathroom marked "Coloured," she (not / allow / touch) the shared coffee pot in the office, and for a long time, whatever the numbers on her page proved, she simply (can / sit) in on the meetings where the real decisions were made.

had to cross · wasn't allowed to touch · couldn't sit

Notice the pattern: necessity uses had to; refused permission uses wasn't allowed to; blocked possibility uses couldn't.

Carry all four forms into the Speak tab — the whole story lives in what these women had to do, weren't allowed to do, and refused to let stop them.

The Real Story — how much of this is true?

Here's what makes Hidden Figures unusual: the three women at its centre, and the extraordinary work they did, are entirely real. The film is based on Margot Lee Shetterly's non-fiction book of the same name, which documents dozens of the "West Computers" — far more than the three the film has time to follow.

🚀 The three women were real — and so were their achievements

Katherine Johnson (called Katherine Goble at the time the film is set) really did work on the orbital mechanics for John Glenn's 1962 flight. Before Glenn would fly, he asked engineers to have Johnson personally check the new IBM 7090 computer's trajectory numbers by hand — a well-documented request. She had already calculated the trajectory for Alan Shepard's 1961 suborbital flight, and later contributed to the calculations behind the 1969 Apollo 11 Moon landing. In 2015, President Obama awarded her the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Dorothy Vaughan was hired in 1943 as a "computer" in the segregated West Area Computing unit at NACA's Langley laboratory, and in 1949 she became NACA's first Black supervisor. When electronic computers arrived in the early 1960s, she taught herself the programming language FORTRAN and taught it to her team, keeping them essential to NASA's work rather than obsolete.

Mary Jackson joined the West Computers in 1951. To qualify as an engineer she needed graduate-level classes held at then-segregated Hampton High School, and had to successfully petition the City of Hampton for special permission to attend alongside white students. She completed the course and, in 1958, became NASA's first Black female engineer.

Where the film reaches for drama

Some of the film's most memorable scenes are dramatizations rather than documented events. The half-mile bathroom run is a vivid symbol of a real, daily indignity, but by most accounts Katherine Johnson mostly refused to use the distant "coloured" bathroom at all, rather than making the long walk — and no one forced her to. The moment where Kevin Costner's character, Al Harrison, takes a crowbar to a "Coloured Ladies Room" sign never happened; there was no single dramatic act by one man that solved the problem. Harrison himself is an invented composite of several real NASA directors, since the filmmakers couldn't secure the rights to portray some of the actual figures involved. The separate coffee pot is also a dramatized detail rather than one specific documented incident, though it captures the spirit of the many small daily indignities Black employees faced.

The film also compresses its timeline for clarity: Dorothy Vaughan's promotion to supervisor actually happened in 1949, over a decade before the Space Race events the film centres on, but the movie shows it unfolding alongside Katherine's trajectory work for the sake of a unified story.

Take these into the discussion:
  • Which detail surprised you most — something you assumed was invented that turns out to be documented, or the reverse?
  • The bathroom run and the coffee pot are dramatized, but they stand for something absolutely real. Does it matter that the specific scene is invented if the underlying truth is accurate?
  • The filmmakers invented a white character to solve the bathroom problem with a single dramatic act. Why might a studio add a moment like that — and is it a fair way to tell this story?

Speak

This is the heart of the lesson — do it all out loud. The timer keeps you going; fill the time with detail.

Useful language: reach for today's forms to talk about the rules of the past — had to ("she had to run half a mile"), wasn't allowed to ("she wasn't allowed to use the same bathroom"), couldn't, and was made to. For opinions: "What's striking is…", "You could argue that…", "On one level… but on another…".
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Tell the story (4 minutes)

Tell the story of Hidden Figures in your own words, as if to someone who has never seen it. Move through the arc: the segregated computing pool → Katherine's rise onto the Space Task Group and the daily indignities that follow her → Dorothy's race against the IBM machine → Mary's fight for permission to study → Glenn's flight and Katherine's hand-checked numbers → the quiet changes afterwards.

Work in at least five key words (meticulous, segregated, indignity, prodigious, tenacity, formidable, condescending, vindicate, groundbreaking, unyielding), and use today's grammar when you describe the rules these women lived under: "she wasn't allowed to use the main bathroom," "she was made to work in a separate room."

Task B · Working around the rules, or changing them? (4 minutes)

Katherine, Dorothy and Mary each find a way around an unjust rule through individual brilliance and sheer persistence, rather than waiting for the rule itself to be abolished. Build an argument: is relying on exceptional individuals to work around an unfair system a real solution — or does lasting change require the rules themselves to be dismantled, regardless of who is talented enough to get around them? Bring in other examples you know.

Task C · Unfair rules, then and now (4 minutes)

The film shows rules that today look plainly unjust, yet were once treated as completely normal. Make your case: how should a society recognise which of its current rules will look unjust to future generations?

Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it:

  • A workplace rule, past or present, that you think is unfair or outdated.
  • A public figure who succeeded despite a system stacked against them.
  • Whether "having to work twice as hard" should ever be the price of entry to a career.
  • A moment in history when a sign, a rule or a law of exclusion was finally removed.
  • Whether talent alone can overturn prejudice, or whether the law must change first.
  • A field — science, sport, politics — where you think representation has changed most in your lifetime.

To finish — the bigger questions

  1. The film shows change arriving through quiet, persistent competence rather than one dramatic confrontation. Is that a more, or less, powerful way to tell this story than a single triumphant scene?
  2. Katherine, Dorothy and Mary all had to prove themselves far beyond what was asked of their white colleagues. Is "having to work twice as hard" still true for some groups in today's workplaces?
  3. Choose one of the three women's stories and say which part of the "Real Story" tab most changed how you saw the film.
  4. Before you go — from memory: give one true sentence with had to or wasn't allowed to, and one with couldn't or was made to, about a rule from your own life or your country's past.