BEHIND THE SCREEN · B2/C1 · 50 min

Parasite

A poor family cons their way into a rich one's house, job by job — until a secret buried beneath it drags everyone into the dark. The poverty, and the anger, are real.

Today: you'll tell the story of Parasite — a poor family who scheme their way, one job at a time, into a wealthy household, until a hidden secret turns everything dark — discover how much of the poverty, and the anger, in the film is real, and master how English sharpens a comparison: modifiers like far, much, slightly and a good deal in front of a comparative, as…as / not nearly as…as, and the double comparative the + comparative…, the + comparative….
Before we begin — talk it through: Have you ever pretended to be slightly more qualified, confident or experienced than you really were, to get something you wanted? Do you think it's possible to really understand a family's life just by watching them from the outside? And what do you imagine a single day looks like for a family with far more money than yours — and for one with far less?

The words for today's story

Work through the four short activities. Each word is shown in a situation that gives its meaning away — no need to know the film yet. Say your answer out loud first, then reveal.

A. Infer from context — what does the bold word mean?

1. After months with no working boiler and a landlord who never answered the phone, the flat had turned squalid — damp patches spreading up the walls, mould blooming in the corners, the whole place smelling of things left far too long.
squalid (adj) — extremely dirty, run-down and unpleasant, especially because of poverty or neglect.
2. Ignored for a week, the small cut on his hand began festering, the skin around it swelling, reddening and weeping with infection.
to fester (v) — (of a wound) to become infected and worse over time; more broadly, for a problem or resentment to grow steadily worse the longer it is left unresolved.
3. Before the heist, the crew studied the building's floor plans for months, timing every guard's patrol to the second — nothing was left to chance, every detail meticulous.
meticulous (adj) — extremely careful and precise, paying close attention to every small detail.
4. The hotel lobby was almost absurdly opulent — marble underfoot, a crystal chandelier the size of a small car overhead, and staff who appeared silently the instant a guest looked even slightly lost.
opulent (adj) — grand, luxurious and expensive-looking; richly and lavishly furnished.

B. Closest in meaning — which one is nearest?

5. brazen is closest in meaning to: (a) shy and apologetic   (b) bold and shameless   (c) slow and careful
(b) bold and shameless — brazen (adj) describes behaviour that is openly, shamelessly bold, showing no embarrassment even when it should.
6. precarious is closest in meaning to: (a) firmly secured   (b) extremely expensive   (c) unstable and likely to collapse
(c) unstable and likely to collapse — precarious (adj) describes a position or situation that is not securely fixed, and could fail or fall apart at any moment.

C. Which meaning fits? (choose a, b or c)

7. Every time the new intern spoke to the CEO, she agreed enthusiastically with everything he said and complimented his tie, clearly trying to ingratiate herself before she asked for a permanent contract.
To ingratiate yourself with someone is: (a) to argue with them until they respect you; (b) to deliberately act in a way that makes them like or approve of you, often for your own advantage; (c) to avoid them completely.
(b) — to ingratiate (yourself with someone) (v) — to try deliberately, and often a little too eagerly, to win someone's favour or approval, usually for personal gain.
8. The factory owner knew his workers had no other jobs to go to anywhere in the town, and he exploited that fact for years, cutting their pay while their hours grew longer.
To exploit someone is: (a) to reward them generously for their loyalty; (b) to treat them exactly the same as everyone else; (c) to unfairly take advantage of them, usually because they have little power to refuse.
(c) — to exploit (v) — to use someone or something unfairly for your own benefit, especially by taking advantage of a weakness or a lack of choice.

D. Infer from context — two bigger ideas

9. Long before they even reached the alley, a stench reached them first — thick, rotten and impossible to ignore, the kind of smell that seems to cling to your clothes for the rest of the day.
a stench (n) — a very strong and extremely unpleasant smell.
10. A tapeworm is a textbook parasite: it lives inside another creature's body, feeds silently off whatever that creature eats, and gives nothing back in return — often for years, without its host ever noticing it is there.
a parasite (n) — an organism that lives on or inside another organism (its "host"), taking what it needs to survive while giving nothing back, sometimes without the host even realising.

Now use them — out loud

Talk it through before we watch:
  • Using squalid, opulent and precarious, predict: what kind of two families do you think this film is about?
  • The film is called Parasite. Before you know anything else about the story, who do you guess the "parasite" might be — and who might be the "host"? There may be more than one honest answer.

The film, in three parts

Bong Joon-ho's Parasite (2019). Read each part, try the quick check from memory, then discuss. (There are spoilers ahead — that's the point; we're here to talk about it. One part below touches on violence; it's handled here without graphic detail.)

Part 1 — Two families, one house

The Kim family survives in a cramped semi-basement flat in Seoul on whatever work they can find: folding pizza boxes for pennies, catching a neighbour's wifi through the bathroom window when their own gets cut off. Father Ki-taek, mother Chung-sook, and their grown children Ki-woo and Ki-jung are clever, capable, and completely stuck — no money, no connections, and, it seems, no way up.

Then Ki-woo's old friend Min-hyuk, heading abroad to study, hands him an opportunity: a well-paid job tutoring English for a wealthy family, the Parks, whose teenage daughter Da-hye he has been teaching. Ki-woo has never actually been to university, but his sister Ki-jung forges a diploma with expert precision, and "Kevin" — poised, confident, entirely invented — walks into the Parks' immaculate, architect-designed house and is hired on the spot by the trusting, easily-impressed mother, Yeon-kyo.

It is only the beginning. Ki-woo notices the Parks' young son, Da-song, is a handful, and recommends an "art therapist" he happens to know — unrelated, of course: his own sister, now "Jessica." One by one, with forged papers, plausible lies and a staged allergy that gets the loyal housekeeper Moon-gwang fired, all four Kims talk, scheme and forge their way into jobs inside the same house — driver, housekeeper, tutor, therapist — without either Park parent ever suspecting their new staff are one family.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What is the Kim family's situation at the start, and how does Ki-woo get his first job with the Parks?

2. How do all four Kims end up working for the Parks without the Parks realising they're related?

1. They live in poverty in a semi-basement flat; a friend's tip and a forged diploma get Ki-woo hired as the Parks' English tutor under the name "Kevin."

2. Each Kim recommends the next as an unrelated specialist, using forged documents and staged incidents (like the fake allergy) to get the existing staff fired and themselves hired instead.

Discuss:
  • Is what the Kims are doing "wrong," given how few real choices they seem to have? Where is the line between a survival hustle and exploitation?

Part 2 — The house has another secret

With the Parks away on a camping trip, the Kims take over the empty house for a night, drinking the family's whisky and imagining, just for a few hours, what it would feel like to actually own it all. The illusion doesn't last. Late at night, the doorbell rings: it's Moon-gwang, the housekeeper they had schemed to get fired, asking to come in and collect something she left behind.

What she left behind is her husband, Geun-sae — hiding, for years, in a secret bunker built beneath the house by its original architect as a shelter from the North, unknown even to the Parks. He has been living there in total secrecy, fed scraps by his wife, hiding from debt collectors who would otherwise ruin him. When Moon-gwang realises the Kims are a family running the very same kind of con she has feared being exposed for herself, a desperate standoff turns violent — just as the Parks call to say the rain has cancelled their trip and they are coming home within the hour.

What follows is chaos: the Kims scramble to erase every trace of themselves from the house, lock the wounded Moon-gwang and her husband in the bunker, and stumble home through a torrential, city-drowning storm — only to find their own semi-basement flooded to the ceiling with sewage, their whole home wrecked in a single night.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What secret does Moon-gwang reveal is hidden beneath the Park house?

2. What happens to the Kims' own home while they're dealing with the crisis at the Parks' house?

1. A secret bunker where her husband, Geun-sae, has been hiding for years from debt collectors, unknown even to the Parks.

2. A huge storm floods it with sewage while they're away, destroying their home the same night.

Discuss:
  • Two poor families, both hiding secrets inside the same rich family's house, turn on each other rather than on the family exploiting them both. Why do you think the film sets it up that way?

Part 3 — The party

The next day, as if nothing happened, the Parks throw a lavish garden party for Da-song's birthday — sunshine, a marquee, wealthy guests — while, across the city, the Kims' home is still full of filthy floodwater. The contrast the film has been building all along finally breaks open in public.

During the party, Geun-sae — deranged after his ordeal in the bunker — breaks free, grabs a kitchen knife, and attacks the Kim family in front of the horrified guests, fatally stabbing Ki-jung. In the panic that follows, Chung-sook kills Geun-sae. But it is a smaller, quieter gesture that detonates the film's real point: as Park patriarch Dong-ik crouches over the dying Geun-sae to grab a set of car keys, he flinches and pinches his nose at the smell — the very same "smell" he has quietly complained about regarding his own driver, Ki-taek, throughout the film, a smell money can wash off and poverty, apparently, cannot. Something in Ki-taek breaks. He picks up the knife and kills Dong-ik.

Ki-taek disappears — and, in the film's final twist, he is revealed to be living out the rest of his life exactly where Geun-sae once did: in the secret bunker beneath the house, now occupied by a different, oblivious wealthy family. Ki-woo, recovering from a head injury, writes his father a letter describing a plan: he will study, get rich, and buy the house himself, to legally free his father one day. The film's closing shot pulls us straight back to the cramped, sunken semi-basement flat where it all began — the plan, we understand, is a beautiful, almost impossible dream.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What does Dong-ik do at the moment that seems to push Ki-taek toward violence?

2. Where does Ki-taek end up living, and what does Ki-woo plan, however unlikely it may be?

1. He flinches and pinches his nose in disgust at the dying man's smell — echoing his contempt for Ki-taek's own "smell" throughout the film.

2. He hides, permanently, in the secret bunker beneath the Park house; Ki-woo vows to earn enough money to legally buy the house and free him, a plan the film frames as an almost impossible fantasy.

Discuss:
  • The film ends not with justice or escape, but with the poor family scattered, disgraced or hiding, while the house and the wealth continue almost undisturbed. Why end the story that way?

Grammar — comparison structures

Parasite is a film built entirely on the gap between two families — and English has a whole toolbox for measuring exactly how big a gap is. Today: three ways to sharpen a plain comparative into something far more precise.

1. Modifiers before the comparative: add a word before -er / more to say how much more or less. Small difference: slightly, a little. Big difference: much, far, a good deal.
e.g. "A new phone is often far more expensive than last year's model, but only slightly faster."
2. as…as / not nearly as…as: use as + adjective + as to say two things are equal, and not nearly as + adjective + as to say there's a big gap.
e.g. "She is every bit as talented as her older brother, even though she started years later." "This meal was not nearly as spicy as the last one — I could barely taste the chilli."
3. The double comparative — the + comparative…, the + comparative…: shows two things changing together, as cause and effect.
e.g. "The higher you climb, the colder it gets." "The longer you wait, the harder it is to start."

1. Choose the right modifier + comparative

Use the words in brackets to build the comparative the sentence needs.

1. The Parks' house was (grand / far) than anything the Kims had ever lived in. (a big difference)

2. Ki-jung's forged certificate looked (convincing / slightly) than her first attempt — just enough to fool the family. (a small improvement)

3. Compared with the Parks' dry, elevated garden, the flooded streets outside the Kims' flat that night were (dangerous / a good deal). (a large difference)

1. far grander (big difference)

2. slightly more convincing (small difference)

3. a good deal more dangerous (big difference)

2. as…as, or not nearly as…as?

Decide whether the sentence describes something equal, or something with a big gap, then complete it.

1. Yeon-kyo genuinely believed her son's old housekeeper, Moon-gwang, was (trustworthy / as) as any employee she had ever hired. (equal — no real difference)

2. But the Kims' shabby, waterlogged flat was (safe / not nearly / as) as the Parks' house on the hill. (a huge gap — much less)

3. For a few hours, "Jessica" seemed (qualified / just / as) as any real art therapist Yeon-kyo could have hired. (equal, at least on the surface)

1. as trustworthy (equal)

2. not nearly as safe (big gap)

3. just as qualified (equal, on the surface)

3. Complete the double comparatives

Fill both gaps in each sentence, then read it aloud.

1. (long / the) the Kims kept up the act, (hard / the) it became to keep two families — and two sets of secrets — apart.

2. (much / the) money the Parks spent on comfort, (little / the) they seemed to notice the family quietly running their household.

1. The longer … the harder

2. The more … the less

Notice the pattern: both halves start with "the" + a comparative, and the second half describes the effect of the first.

The Real Story — how much of this is true?

Parasite looks like a thriller, but almost everything beneath its surface is documented, real, and still shaping South Korea today.

🏆 A genuine first for the Oscars

At the 2020 Academy Awards, Parasite won Best Picture — the first non-English-language film to do so in the Academy's ninety-two-year history — along with Best Director, Best Original Screenplay and Best International Feature Film. It was also the first South Korean film ever to win an Oscar of any kind. Not an exaggeration for effect: genuinely historic.

The semi-basement is a real kind of home

The Kims' cramped flat is a banjiha — a real category of South Korean housing, found by the hundreds of thousands, especially in Seoul. Banjiha weren't originally built as homes at all: in the 1970s, with tension high between North and South Korea, the government required new low-rise buildings to include a basement that could double as a bomb shelter. As Seoul's population exploded and housing grew scarce, landlords began illegally renting these spaces out; the government finally legalised them for living in 1984. Cheap, often damp, dimly lit and set half below street level, they remain one of the cheapest ways to live in one of the world's most expensive cities — home to roughly 2% of South Korean households, the vast majority of them in Seoul.

The film's own storm turned out to be tragically prophetic. In August 2022, record rainfall flooded Seoul; at least eleven people died in the city, and three of them — two sisters and a young relative — drowned inside a single banjiha flat when the floodwater rose faster than they could escape. Seoul's city government responded by banning new banjiha construction and announcing a twenty-year plan to phase out existing ones. The film wasn't exaggerating the danger; if anything, it anticipated it.

"Spoon class theory" — and the smell money can't wash off

The gap the film dramatises has its own name in Korean popular culture: sujeo gyegeullon, or "spoon class theory." Since around 2015, young South Koreans have used it to describe how a person's life chances are largely set at birth — a "gold spoon" if born into wealth, a "dirt spoon" if not — regardless of effort or ability, a frustration that sharpened after South Korea's tough late-1990s economic crisis and a growing sense that upward mobility had quietly closed off.

One detail the film returns to again and again — the "smell" the Parks notice on their driver, and later on the whole Kim family — was entirely deliberate. Director Bong Joon-ho has explained that "the only time those of different classes can smell each other is when the poor work for the rich families as tutors, housekeepers and drivers," adding that using smell let the film explore class "in a more delicate and multi-layered manner" than showing poverty and wealth side by side ever could. It's a smell soap can't remove, because it isn't really about hygiene at all — it's about a life lived in a small, damp, underground room.

Take these into the discussion:
  • Before this lesson, did you assume the semi-basement flat was invented for the film, or did you already know banjiha are real?
  • Does knowing that three people actually drowned in a flat like the Kims' change how you watch the film's flood scene?
  • "Spoon class theory" says that birth decides most of your future. How true does that feel in your own country?

Speak

This is the heart of the lesson — do it all out loud. The timer keeps you going; fill the time with detail.

Useful language: reach for today's comparison structures — modifiers ("their house was far grander than…"), as…as ("not nearly as safe as…"), and the double comparative ("the longer the deception continued, the more dangerous it became"). For opinions: "What's striking is…", "You could argue that…", "On one level… but on another…".
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Tell the story (4 minutes)

Tell the story of Parasite in your own words, as if to someone who has never seen it. Move through the arc: the squalid semi-basement and the tutoring job → the family's meticulous scheme to get all four of them hired → the storm, the secret bunker, and the flood → the birthday party and its violent, opulent collapse.

Work in at least five key words (squalid, festering, meticulous, opulent, brazen, precarious, ingratiate, exploit, stench, parasite), and use comparison structures wherever you can: "the Parks' house was far grander than…", "the longer the deception continued, the more dangerous it became."

Task B · Who is the real parasite? (4 minutes)

Build an argument: is the Kims' con justified because society left them almost no legitimate way up — or is deceiving people always wrong, whatever your circumstances? Then take the harder version of the same question: by the end of the film, who do you think is the real "parasite" — the poor family who scheme their way into the house, or the rich family who depend completely on invisible labour they barely notice?

Task C · Class, luck and effort (4 minutes)

The film ends with Ki-woo's plan to earn enough money to buy the house and free his father — a plan the film clearly frames as an impossible dream. Talk about the space between hard work and real opportunity.

Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it:

  • A time you (or someone you know) pretended to be more qualified than you were to get an opportunity.
  • Whether you believe someone born poor today can realistically become rich through hard work alone.
  • A "gold spoon" / "dirt spoon" example from your own country — a real gap between the born-lucky and everyone else.
  • Whether housing like banjiha — cheap, small, underground — exists in some form where you live.
  • A film, book or true story about class that you found more, or less, honest than Parasite.
  • Something you would change first if you had the power to fix one unfair gap between rich and poor.

To finish — the bigger questions

  1. The film ends not with justice, but with one family scattered, hiding or dead, while the house and the wealth carry on almost undisturbed. Why end the story that way?
  2. Bong Joon-ho called the "smell" a way to explore class "delicately." Do you think a subtle detail like that says more about inequality than a dramatic speech would?
  3. Two poor families — the Kims and Moon-gwang's — turn on each other rather than uniting against the family exploiting them both. Why do you think the film chooses that, instead of solidarity?
  4. Before you go — from memory: give one sentence using a modifier + comparative (far / much / slightly / a good deal + comparative), and one using the double comparative (the + comparative…, the + comparative…), both about real inequality you've noticed in your own life.