For a thousand years, everyone agreed it was only a beautiful legend — until someone actually dug it out of the ground.
Need an easier version? Read this lesson at A2/B1 level →
Work through the four short activities. Each word is shown in a situation that gives its meaning away — no need to know the film yet. Say your answer out loud first, then reveal.
Wolfgang Petersen's Troy (2004), based on the legend of the Trojan War. Read each part, try the quick check from memory, then discuss. (There are spoilers ahead — that's the point; we're here to talk about it.)
Prince Paris of Troy travels to Sparta on what is meant to be a peace mission, and falls in love with Helen, the wife of the Spartan king, Menelaus. Against all sense, Paris takes Helen back to Troy with him. Menelaus is humiliated and furious, and turns to his brother, Agamemnon — the most powerful king in Greece, ambitious for conquest far beyond one insult. Agamemnon has long wanted an excuse to bring the wealthy city of Troy under his control, and Helen's abduction gives him exactly that.
Agamemnon assembles an enormous alliance of Greek kings and their armies, including the invincible warrior Achilles, who fights less out of loyalty to Agamemnon — whom he despises — than for personal glory that will outlast his own life. The Greek fleet crosses the sea and lands on the beach beneath Troy's walls. Troy's king, Priam, and his elder son, Hector — a disciplined, honourable soldier who begged Paris not to bring Helen home in the first place — must now defend the city against a war none of them chose.
What follows is not a quick raid but a long, grinding siege: years of battles beneath towering walls that never fall by force alone.
1. Why does the Greek army sail to Troy?
2. Why is Agamemnon so willing to go to war over Helen?
1. Paris, a Trojan prince, has taken Helen, wife of the Spartan king Menelaus, back to Troy with him.
2. Beyond defending his brother's honour, Agamemnon has long wanted to conquer the wealthy city of Troy, and Helen's abduction gives him the perfect justification.
Achilles' pride is wounded when Agamemnon claims Briseis, a captured Trojan priestess Achilles has come to care for, as his own prize. Furious and disgusted at fighting for a king he considers unworthy, Achilles withdraws from the battle entirely and refuses to fight, no matter how badly the Greeks need him.
Desperate to turn the battle and impatient to prove himself, Achilles' young cousin Patroclus secretly borrows his armour and leads Achilles' fierce soldiers, the Myrmidons, into combat disguised as Achilles himself. Believing he is finally facing his greatest rival, Hector duels and kills him — only afterwards discovering, in horror, that he has killed a boy wearing another man's armour.
Achilles' wrath is now absolute. He returns to the battlefield, hunts Hector down before the walls of Troy, and kills him in single combat as Hector's family watches from above. Not satisfied even with this, Achilles drags Hector's body behind his chariot in the dust — until, in one of the story's most human moments, King Priam himself walks alone into the enemy camp at night to beg, face to face, for his son's body back.
1. Why does Patroclus end up fighting Hector while wearing Achilles' armour?
2. What does Priam do after Hector is killed?
1. With Achilles refusing to fight after a quarrel with Agamemnon, Patroclus secretly wears his armour to lead the Myrmidons into battle, and Hector kills him believing he is Achilles.
2. Grief-stricken, Priam walks alone into the Greek camp at night to beg Achilles, in person, to return his son's body for a proper burial.
Years of siege have exhausted both sides, and Troy's walls have never once been breached by force. The cunning Greek king Odysseus proposes a trick instead of another assault: the Greeks will pretend to abandon the war and sail away, leaving behind an enormous wooden horse as a supposed offering to the gods — with a company of soldiers concealed inside it. Believing the war finally over, the jubilant Trojans drag the horse inside their own walls to celebrate.
That night, the hidden soldiers climb out and open Troy's gates from within, letting the returned Greek army pour into the sleeping city. What follows is chaos and slaughter: Troy burns, Priam is killed at his own altar, and Paris — in the story's sharpest reversal — kills the supposedly invincible Achilles with an arrow to his one vulnerable spot, his heel.
Amid the destruction, a handful of Trojans escape the burning city, carrying what they can save of their people's future beyond the fall of Troy itself. A ten-year war, provoked by one stolen queen, ends not in open battle but in a single, devastating act of deception.
1. How do the Greeks finally get inside Troy's walls?
2. How does Achilles die?
1. Odysseus's trick: soldiers hide inside a giant wooden horse left as a fake offering, and open the gates from inside once the Trojans have pulled it into the city.
2. Paris kills him with an arrow to his heel, his one vulnerable spot, during the chaos of the city's fall.
No story needs this language more than one where nobody can be entirely sure what really happened. English has a special way of reporting a claim without saying exactly who is making it, and without claiming it is proven fact — perfect for a legend whose truth is still argued over today.
Turn each claim into the impersonal passive structure. Use the verb given.
1. People believe the wooden horse was Odysseus's idea. → the wooden horse was Odysseus's idea. (believe)
2. Historians think a real war lies somewhere behind the legend. → a real war lies somewhere behind the legend. (think)
3. Some scholars say Homer never actually existed as one single poet. → Homer never actually existed as one single poet. (say)
1. It is believed that
2. It is thought that
3. It is said that
Turn each claim about the past into the second structure.
1. People believe the city burned in a great fire. The city in a great fire. (believe / burn)
2. Historians think the siege lasted many years. The siege many years. (think / last)
3. Some say the treasure belonged to an even older king. The treasure to an even older king. (say / belong)
1. is believed to have burned
2. is thought to have lasted
3. is said to have belonged
Fill each gap with an impersonal passive or reporting structure. Read it aloud when you're done.
For centuries, the fall of Troy was dismissed as pure invention. (it / rumour) that the story was nothing more than a poet's fantasy. Today, the ruins beneath Hisarlik (think) to mark the real site of the city, even though the poem's exact events (never / prove) to have happened.
It was rumoured · are thought · have never been proven
Notice the pattern: "It is/was + reporting verb + that" reports a whole claim; "subject + is/are + reporting verb + to have + past participle" reports a claim about that subject's past.
Carry this language into the Speak tab — almost everything interesting about Troy has to be introduced with it is said that… or is thought to have…, because almost nothing can be stated as plain, certain fact.
Troy is the rarest kind of story: a legend that turned out to have real ground underneath it — even if not everything on top of that ground is true.
The core of the tale comes from the Iliad, an epic poem traditionally credited to the Greek poet Homer, thought to have been composed around the 8th century BC about events imagined as having happened centuries earlier. But the Iliad itself covers only a few weeks near the end of the tenth year of the war — it does not even include the wooden horse. That part of the story comes from later poems in the same tradition (the "Epic Cycle") and from later retellings, most famously in the Roman poet Virgil's Aeneid. In other words, "the story of Troy" that most people know is not one single ancient text but a legend assembled from several sources over centuries.
For a very long time, educated opinion treated the Trojan War as pure literary invention, with no more historical reality than the gods who fight alongside the humans in Homer's poem. That changed in the 1870s, when the German businessman-turned-archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann, working with the British archaeologist Frank Calvert — who had already identified the site and owned part of it — excavated a mound called Hisarlik, on the coast of modern-day Turkey. Digging down through its many layers, Schliemann uncovered the remains of a real, ancient walled city that had been destroyed by fire.
This does not prove that Achilles, Hector or Helen ever existed, or that events unfolded exactly as Homer describes. What it does prove is that a real city stood on that spot, was fortified against attack, and did burn — evidence that something historical almost certainly lies behind the legend, even if the poem itself is not a reliable eyewitness account. Schliemann's own methods were far from perfect — his enormous trenches actually destroyed some of the very archaeological layers later scholars most wanted to study — but the discovery permanently changed how historians treat the legend.
Three changes matter most. First, Wolfgang Petersen's Troy removes the Greek gods entirely, presenting an entirely human war. In Homer's Iliad, the gods are not background decoration — they are central characters, constantly intervening: deflecting spears, inspiring rage, even carrying heroes physically off the battlefield. Cutting them out makes the film feel more realistic, but it also removes the poem's whole argument about fate, divine favour and human powerlessness.
Second, the film compresses a war the tradition says lasted ten years into what feels like a few weeks of screen time — necessary for a two-hour film, but a huge distortion of the original story's scale and exhaustion.
Third, the film kills off two major characters who survive in the ancient tradition. In the film, Hector kills Menelaus in single combat, and Briseis kills Agamemnon during the fall of the city. In the myths, both men survive the war: Menelaus reclaims Helen and returns home to Sparta with her, while Agamemnon returns home to Mycenae in triumph — only to be murdered there, in peacetime, by his own wife, Clytemnestra.
Want the fuller story of the poems themselves? Read The Iliad & The Odyssey.
This is the heart of the lesson — do it all out loud. The timer keeps you going; fill the time with detail.
Tell the story of Troy in your own words, as if to someone who has never heard the legend. Move through the arc: Paris takes Helen from Menelaus → Agamemnon's fleet sails to Troy and the long siege begins → Achilles' wrath and the deaths of Patroclus and Hector → the wooden horse and the fall of the city.
Work in at least five key words (siege, wrath, plunder, truce, valiant, ruthless, ultimatum, treachery, legendary, unyielding), and use the passive/impersonal reporting structures at least twice: "it is said that…", "Achilles is thought to have been…"
Achilles fights for personal glory, not loyalty to Agamemnon; Hector fights out of duty to family and city, even though he thinks the war is wrong. Build an argument: is it better to fight for a cause you believe in personally, even a selfish one — or to fight loyally for your people, even in a war you privately oppose?
Troy shows that a "mere legend" can turn out to have real history underneath it. Is it worth taking old myths and legends seriously as possible clues to real history, or is that usually a waste of time? Make your case.
Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it: