BEHIND THE SCREEN · B2/C1 · 50 min

Troy

For a thousand years, everyone agreed it was only a beautiful legend — until someone actually dug it out of the ground.

Today: you'll tell the story of Troy — a stolen queen, a ten-year siege and the fall of a great city — discover how much of the legend turned out to be true, and master the language English uses when nobody can prove a claim for certain: the passive and impersonal reporting structures ("it is said that…", "Troy is thought to have fallen…").
Before we begin — talk it through: Do you think a single event — one insult, one betrayal, one stolen thing — could ever be a good enough reason to start a war? And how much of the "history" you learned at school do you think is really provable fact, rather than a story people agreed to believe?

The words for today's story

Work through the four short activities. Each word is shown in a situation that gives its meaning away — no need to know the film yet. Say your answer out loud first, then reveal.

A. Infer from context — what does the bold word mean?

1. For ten long years the army camped outside the city walls, holding it under siege, so that nothing — no food, no water, no reinforcements — could pass in or out.
a siege (n) — a military operation in which an army surrounds a place and cuts it off, to force the people inside to surrender.
2. His wrath was frightening to witness: an all-consuming fury so total that he refused to eat, sleep or speak to another living soul for days.
wrath (n) — extreme, burning anger.
3. The moment the gates fell, soldiers poured through the burning streets to plunder whatever gold and treasure they could carry before the fire took it.
to plunder (v) — to steal goods by force, typically during a war or riot.
4. Exhausted after years of fighting, the two sides agreed a short truce, so that both could safely gather and bury their dead without fear of attack.
a truce (n) — a temporary agreement to stop fighting.

B. Closest in meaning — which one is nearest?

5. valiant is closest in meaning to: (a) cowardly   (b) brave   (c) careless
(b) brave — valiant (adj) means showing great courage, especially in a difficult fight.
6. ruthless is closest in meaning to: (a) merciful   (b) without pity   (c) uncertain
(b) without pity — ruthless (adj) means having no compassion for others; willing to cause harm to get what you want.

C. Which meaning fits? (choose a, b or c)

7. The messenger delivered an ultimatum: return what had been stolen within three days, or face total war.
An ultimatum is: (a) a friendly suggestion; (b) a final demand backed by a threat; (c) a formal apology.
(b) — an ultimatum (n) — a final demand, with the threat of serious consequences if it is refused.
8. He wasn't killed on the battlefield at all — he died through treachery, betrayed from within by someone he trusted completely.
Treachery is: (a) loyal service; (b) betrayal of trust; (c) simple bad luck.
(b) — treachery (n) — the act of betraying someone's trust; deceit against people who believed you were loyal.

D. Infer from context — two bigger ideas

9. For centuries the event was thought to be purely legendary — a beautiful tale invented by poets, with no more truth in it than a folk story about giants.
legendary (adj) — famous through legend or old stories, rather than through proven historical fact.
10. Even facing certain defeat, the warrior stayed unyielding: he refused, whatever happened, ever to give up, retreat or change his mind.
unyielding (adj) — refusing to give in, change, or be persuaded; completely firm.

Now use them — out loud

Talk it through before we watch:
  • Using siege, wrath and plunder, predict: what kind of story do you expect from a film about an ancient war over a stolen woman?
  • Which of these ten words describe a person's character, and which describe an event? Sort them out loud and say why.

The film, in three parts

Wolfgang Petersen's Troy (2004), based on the legend of the Trojan War. Read each part, try the quick check from memory, then discuss. (There are spoilers ahead — that's the point; we're here to talk about it.)

Part 1 — A stolen queen, and a thousand ships

Prince Paris of Troy travels to Sparta on what is meant to be a peace mission, and falls in love with Helen, the wife of the Spartan king, Menelaus. Against all sense, Paris takes Helen back to Troy with him. Menelaus is humiliated and furious, and turns to his brother, Agamemnon — the most powerful king in Greece, ambitious for conquest far beyond one insult. Agamemnon has long wanted an excuse to bring the wealthy city of Troy under his control, and Helen's abduction gives him exactly that.

Agamemnon assembles an enormous alliance of Greek kings and their armies, including the invincible warrior Achilles, who fights less out of loyalty to Agamemnon — whom he despises — than for personal glory that will outlast his own life. The Greek fleet crosses the sea and lands on the beach beneath Troy's walls. Troy's king, Priam, and his elder son, Hector — a disciplined, honourable soldier who begged Paris not to bring Helen home in the first place — must now defend the city against a war none of them chose.

What follows is not a quick raid but a long, grinding siege: years of battles beneath towering walls that never fall by force alone.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. Why does the Greek army sail to Troy?

2. Why is Agamemnon so willing to go to war over Helen?

1. Paris, a Trojan prince, has taken Helen, wife of the Spartan king Menelaus, back to Troy with him.

2. Beyond defending his brother's honour, Agamemnon has long wanted to conquer the wealthy city of Troy, and Helen's abduction gives him the perfect justification.

Discuss:
  • Hector warned his brother Paris not to bring Helen home, knowing it could mean war — but he fights anyway, to protect his family and his city. Is loyalty to family a good enough reason to fight in a war you privately think is wrong?

Part 2 — Achilles' wrath, and the death of Hector

Achilles' pride is wounded when Agamemnon claims Briseis, a captured Trojan priestess Achilles has come to care for, as his own prize. Furious and disgusted at fighting for a king he considers unworthy, Achilles withdraws from the battle entirely and refuses to fight, no matter how badly the Greeks need him.

Desperate to turn the battle and impatient to prove himself, Achilles' young cousin Patroclus secretly borrows his armour and leads Achilles' fierce soldiers, the Myrmidons, into combat disguised as Achilles himself. Believing he is finally facing his greatest rival, Hector duels and kills him — only afterwards discovering, in horror, that he has killed a boy wearing another man's armour.

Achilles' wrath is now absolute. He returns to the battlefield, hunts Hector down before the walls of Troy, and kills him in single combat as Hector's family watches from above. Not satisfied even with this, Achilles drags Hector's body behind his chariot in the dust — until, in one of the story's most human moments, King Priam himself walks alone into the enemy camp at night to beg, face to face, for his son's body back.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. Why does Patroclus end up fighting Hector while wearing Achilles' armour?

2. What does Priam do after Hector is killed?

1. With Achilles refusing to fight after a quarrel with Agamemnon, Patroclus secretly wears his armour to lead the Myrmidons into battle, and Hector kills him believing he is Achilles.

2. Grief-stricken, Priam walks alone into the Greek camp at night to beg Achilles, in person, to return his son's body for a proper burial.

Discuss:
  • Achilles' rage over a personal insult costs the lives of Patroclus and Hector, and changes the whole course of the war. How much damage can one person's wounded pride really do?

Part 3 — The wooden horse, and the fall of Troy

Years of siege have exhausted both sides, and Troy's walls have never once been breached by force. The cunning Greek king Odysseus proposes a trick instead of another assault: the Greeks will pretend to abandon the war and sail away, leaving behind an enormous wooden horse as a supposed offering to the gods — with a company of soldiers concealed inside it. Believing the war finally over, the jubilant Trojans drag the horse inside their own walls to celebrate.

That night, the hidden soldiers climb out and open Troy's gates from within, letting the returned Greek army pour into the sleeping city. What follows is chaos and slaughter: Troy burns, Priam is killed at his own altar, and Paris — in the story's sharpest reversal — kills the supposedly invincible Achilles with an arrow to his one vulnerable spot, his heel.

Amid the destruction, a handful of Trojans escape the burning city, carrying what they can save of their people's future beyond the fall of Troy itself. A ten-year war, provoked by one stolen queen, ends not in open battle but in a single, devastating act of deception.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. How do the Greeks finally get inside Troy's walls?

2. How does Achilles die?

1. Odysseus's trick: soldiers hide inside a giant wooden horse left as a fake offering, and open the gates from inside once the Trojans have pulled it into the city.

2. Paris kills him with an arrow to his heel, his one vulnerable spot, during the chaos of the city's fall.

Discuss:
  • Troy falls not through the Greeks' courage or strength, but through a trick the Trojans trusted. Is winning by deception as honourable as winning by force — or does it matter how a victory is achieved?

Grammar — the passive & impersonal reporting

No story needs this language more than one where nobody can be entirely sure what really happened. English has a special way of reporting a claim without saying exactly who is making it, and without claiming it is proven fact — perfect for a legend whose truth is still argued over today.

Structure 1 — It + passive reporting verb + that:
It is said / believed / thought / rumoured that + clause — used to report a widely held claim without naming the source. "It is said that the war lasted ten years." "It is thought that a real city once stood on the site."
Structure 2 — Subject + passive reporting verb + to infinitive:
Subject + is/are said/thought/believed + to + infinitive (present) or to have + past participle (past) — the same idea, but built around the subject itself. "Achilles is said to have been unbeatable in single combat." "The city is believed to have burned to the ground."
Why use it at all? Both structures let you report something without personally guaranteeing it's true — ideal for history, rumour, and legend. Compare: "The war lasted ten years" (stated as plain fact) vs "It is said that the war lasted ten years" (reporting a claim, distancing yourself from full certainty).

1. Rewrite with "It is + reporting verb + that…"

Turn each claim into the impersonal passive structure. Use the verb given.

1. People believe the wooden horse was Odysseus's idea. → the wooden horse was Odysseus's idea. (believe)

2. Historians think a real war lies somewhere behind the legend. → a real war lies somewhere behind the legend. (think)

3. Some scholars say Homer never actually existed as one single poet. → Homer never actually existed as one single poet. (say)

1. It is believed that

2. It is thought that

3. It is said that

2. Rewrite with "Subject + is/are + reporting verb + to have + past participle"

Turn each claim about the past into the second structure.

1. People believe the city burned in a great fire. The city in a great fire. (believe / burn)

2. Historians think the siege lasted many years. The siege many years. (think / last)

3. Some say the treasure belonged to an even older king. The treasure to an even older king. (say / belong)

1. is believed to have burned

2. is thought to have lasted

3. is said to have belonged

3. Complete the paragraph — mix both structures

Fill each gap with an impersonal passive or reporting structure. Read it aloud when you're done.

For centuries, the fall of Troy was dismissed as pure invention. (it / rumour) that the story was nothing more than a poet's fantasy. Today, the ruins beneath Hisarlik (think) to mark the real site of the city, even though the poem's exact events (never / prove) to have happened.

It was rumoured · are thought · have never been proven

Notice the pattern: "It is/was + reporting verb + that" reports a whole claim; "subject + is/are + reporting verb + to have + past participle" reports a claim about that subject's past.

Carry this language into the Speak tab — almost everything interesting about Troy has to be introduced with it is said that… or is thought to have…, because almost nothing can be stated as plain, certain fact.

The Real Story — myth, history, and what the film changed

Troy is the rarest kind of story: a legend that turned out to have real ground underneath it — even if not everything on top of that ground is true.

📜 The story comes from Homer — and beyond

The core of the tale comes from the Iliad, an epic poem traditionally credited to the Greek poet Homer, thought to have been composed around the 8th century BC about events imagined as having happened centuries earlier. But the Iliad itself covers only a few weeks near the end of the tenth year of the war — it does not even include the wooden horse. That part of the story comes from later poems in the same tradition (the "Epic Cycle") and from later retellings, most famously in the Roman poet Virgil's Aeneid. In other words, "the story of Troy" that most people know is not one single ancient text but a legend assembled from several sources over centuries.

For centuries, it was "just" a legend — then someone dug it up

For a very long time, educated opinion treated the Trojan War as pure literary invention, with no more historical reality than the gods who fight alongside the humans in Homer's poem. That changed in the 1870s, when the German businessman-turned-archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann, working with the British archaeologist Frank Calvert — who had already identified the site and owned part of it — excavated a mound called Hisarlik, on the coast of modern-day Turkey. Digging down through its many layers, Schliemann uncovered the remains of a real, ancient walled city that had been destroyed by fire.

This does not prove that Achilles, Hector or Helen ever existed, or that events unfolded exactly as Homer describes. What it does prove is that a real city stood on that spot, was fortified against attack, and did burn — evidence that something historical almost certainly lies behind the legend, even if the poem itself is not a reliable eyewitness account. Schliemann's own methods were far from perfect — his enormous trenches actually destroyed some of the very archaeological layers later scholars most wanted to study — but the discovery permanently changed how historians treat the legend.

What the film changed

Three changes matter most. First, Wolfgang Petersen's Troy removes the Greek gods entirely, presenting an entirely human war. In Homer's Iliad, the gods are not background decoration — they are central characters, constantly intervening: deflecting spears, inspiring rage, even carrying heroes physically off the battlefield. Cutting them out makes the film feel more realistic, but it also removes the poem's whole argument about fate, divine favour and human powerlessness.

Second, the film compresses a war the tradition says lasted ten years into what feels like a few weeks of screen time — necessary for a two-hour film, but a huge distortion of the original story's scale and exhaustion.

Third, the film kills off two major characters who survive in the ancient tradition. In the film, Hector kills Menelaus in single combat, and Briseis kills Agamemnon during the fall of the city. In the myths, both men survive the war: Menelaus reclaims Helen and returns home to Sparta with her, while Agamemnon returns home to Mycenae in triumph — only to be murdered there, in peacetime, by his own wife, Clytemnestra.

Take these into the discussion:
  • Before this lesson, did you assume Troy was pure fiction, or did you already know something real was found?
  • Does it change how you feel about the film to know it removed the gods completely — or does that make it more relatable, not less honest?
  • Historical films almost always compress time and simplify or invent deaths for drama. Does that matter, if the broad shape of the story stays true — or is it a kind of dishonesty?

Want the fuller story of the poems themselves? Read The Iliad & The Odyssey.

Speak

This is the heart of the lesson — do it all out loud. The timer keeps you going; fill the time with detail.

Useful language: reach for today's structures whenever you're reporting a claim you can't fully verify — it is said that…, Troy is thought to have fallen after ten years, the story is told that…. For opinions: "What's striking is…", "You could argue that…", "On one level… but on another…".
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Tell the story (4 minutes)

Tell the story of Troy in your own words, as if to someone who has never heard the legend. Move through the arc: Paris takes Helen from Menelaus → Agamemnon's fleet sails to Troy and the long siege begins → Achilles' wrath and the deaths of Patroclus and Hector → the wooden horse and the fall of the city.

Work in at least five key words (siege, wrath, plunder, truce, valiant, ruthless, ultimatum, treachery, legendary, unyielding), and use the passive/impersonal reporting structures at least twice: "it is said that…", "Achilles is thought to have been…"

Task B · The impossible question (4 minutes)

Achilles fights for personal glory, not loyalty to Agamemnon; Hector fights out of duty to family and city, even though he thinks the war is wrong. Build an argument: is it better to fight for a cause you believe in personally, even a selfish one — or to fight loyally for your people, even in a war you privately oppose?

Task C · Myth, memory and truth (4 minutes)

Troy shows that a "mere legend" can turn out to have real history underneath it. Is it worth taking old myths and legends seriously as possible clues to real history, or is that usually a waste of time? Make your case.

Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it:

  • A legend or folk tale from your own country that might have some real history behind it.
  • Whether you think archaeology is an exciting career, or a slow and frustrating one.
  • A time a "story" you were told turned out to be surprisingly true — or completely false.
  • Whether wars are ever really fought over the reasons leaders publicly give for them.
  • What you think future historians will say is thought to have caused a conflict happening in the world today.
  • A film or book that made an old, half-forgotten story suddenly feel real and urgent.

To finish — the bigger questions

  1. Troy is a legend about honour, pride and revenge, dressed up as a war over a woman. Which of the two — the public reason for a conflict, or the private motives underneath it — do you think usually matters more?
  2. Priam begs Achilles, his son's killer, for Hector's body back — and Achilles agrees. What does that moment suggest about honour between enemies?
  3. Schliemann's dramatic dig also damaged the very site he was trying to understand. Does the excitement of a great discovery ever excuse a careless method?
  4. Before you go — from memory: give one sentence using "it is said that…" and one using "is thought to have…" about Troy, and explain what each is reporting.