Comparatives, evaluation language, and the vocabulary of pros and cons
Most people answer this with "I prefer X because..." and stop. But really interesting speakers present BOTH sides — even if they have a clear preference. That's what makes an opinion sound intelligent rather than just personal.
Today: comparatives for measuring, evaluation words for judging, and the grammar of pros and cons.
To discuss advantages and disadvantages properly, you need comparatives and specific evaluation structures:
"Living alone is more expensive, but it's also more peaceful."
"Public transport is cheaper than driving, but less convenient."
"It's not as risky as people think." / "It's far more practical."
Short adjectives: -er (cheaper, safer). Long adjectives: more + adj (more convenient, more practical). "Not as... as" for negative comparison. "Far/much + more" for emphasis.
"The more you practise, the easier it gets."
"The bigger the city, the higher the cost of living."
"The more flexible the job, the less structured your day."
This structure shows how two things are connected. One changes → the other changes too. Very useful for discussing consequences.
One syllable: add -er → cheaper, faster, safer
Two syllables ending in -y: change to -ier → easier, healthier
Two+ syllables: use "more" → more expensive, more convenient
Irregulars: good → better, bad → worse, far → further
"The main advantage is that..." / "One benefit is that..."
"On the downside, ..." / "The biggest drawback is..."
"While it has the advantage of being flexible, it also has the disadvantage of being unstable."
Notice: "advantage/benefit" for good things, "disadvantage/drawback/downside" for bad things. The strongest pattern combines both in one sentence using "while".
"On balance, I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages."
"Overall, the benefits are greater than the risks."
"Taking everything into account, I'd say it's worth it."
"Outweigh" = one side is heavier/more important. This is the key word for balanced conclusions.
Tap to reveal. These are the words for evaluating and comparing.
In each round, give at least two advantages and two disadvantages, then reach a conclusion. You have 90 seconds per round.
Think about money, freedom, security, stress, and social life.
Must use: "The main advantage is..." + "On the downside..." + a comparative
Consider culture, career, family, language, and personal growth.
Must use: "While it has the advantage of..." + "the more..., the more..." + "trade-off"
Think about convenience, experience, returns, environment, and supporting local businesses.
Must use: "A key benefit is..." + "drawback" + "not as... as" + "on balance"
Present both sides with specific advantages and disadvantages. Use comparatives to show which matters more. Give a balanced conclusion.
Must use: at least 5 different evaluation words/phrases + "outweigh" in your conclusion
"I can see why people think..." / "There's some truth to..." / "While I understand the argument..."
Acknowledging + evaluating = the complete balanced answer. Use CT-27 phrases for the acknowledgment, then CT-28 phrases for the evaluation.
"Trust is closely linked to honesty" / "In the end, happiness comes down to relationships"
When weighing advantages and disadvantages, you often need abstract language: "The trade-off comes down to freedom vs security."
"I'm much better at..." / "It's easier now..." / "I'm not as nervous as I used to be..."
The same comparative structures work for evaluating: "Online learning is more flexible, but not as social as classroom learning."
Being able to present both sides of an argument — even when you have a strong opinion — is what separates a good speaker from a great one.