Have a go — no notes, and don't worry about small mistakes.
You already know the basic form. Complete this sentence:
"The colleague sits next to me is from Toronto."
Have a go out loud: describe someone in your family in one sentence using who, that or which. Any sentence is fine.
Ana: How's the new flat working out?
Sam: Actually really well — it's got a little balcony whose view stretches right across the valley, which I definitely wasn't expecting for the price.
Ana: No way. How did you even find it?
Sam: My cousin, through whom I hear about basically everything these days, spotted the listing before it even went online.
Look again at what Sam says. Three grammar choices stand out: "whose view" (for a balcony, not a person), "which I definitely wasn't expecting" (commenting on the whole idea, not one word), and "through whom" (the preposition moved in front of the pronoun). Try to say why each one works before you check.
Adding an aside about someone or something, formally — and the everyday alternative.
Three asides, added mid-sentence:
Before you check: where does the preposition go, and which pronoun follows it for people, which for things?
Same meaning. In everyday speech, the preposition drops to the end and "whom" relaxes to "who". The fronted version is the one people reach for in writing, interviews, or anywhere they want to sound precise.
Complete each sentence with a preposition + which/whom. One gap, two or three words.
1. You spent every summer as a child with your aunt.
"My aunt, I spent every summer as a child, still lives in that same village."
2. You never knew much about history as a subject.
"History was never a subject I knew very much, if I'm honest."
3. You still have huge respect for your old boss.
"My old boss, I still have huge respect, taught me almost everything I know about the job."
Think of someone you work or study with. Say one sentence about them using a fronted preposition — "with whom", "for whom", "to whom" — then say the same sentence the everyday way, preposition at the end.
Referring back to some, not all, of a group you've just mentioned — and "whose" for things.
What comes before "of whom" and "of which" in the first two? And what does "whose" do in the third, given a warehouse isn't a person?
"Whose" is by far the more natural choice for everyday use. "The roof of which" exists and is grammatically correct, but it sounds noticeably formal — you'll meet it more in writing than in conversation.
1. Fifteen former students were invited back for the reunion. Only six actually turned up.
"Fifteen former students were invited back for the reunion, turned up on the night."
2. The museum owns nearly two thousand photographs. Most of them have never been shown to the public.
"The museum owns nearly two thousand photographs, have never been shown to the public."
3. The cottage's walls were nearly a metre thick.
"We stayed in a tiny cottage walls were nearly a metre thick."
Describe a group you belong to — your family, a team, a class. Say one sentence using "... of whom" or "... of which" about part of that group.
Commenting on a whole situation with "which" — and trimming a clause down to its essentials.
In each sentence, what single noun does "which" refer to?
What's missing from these compared with "the man who is standing" or "documents which were submitted"?
1. The trains were cancelled all afternoon without warning. This left hundreds of people stranded at the station.
"The trains were cancelled all afternoon without warning, left hundreds of people stranded at the station."
2. The couple who are renting the flat next door just had a baby. (Cut the clause down.)
"The couple the flat next door just had a baby."
3. The photos which were taken during the trip are all a bit blurry. (Cut the clause down.)
"The photos during the trip are all a bit blurry."
Say one sentence about something annoying or great that happened recently, ending in a comment with "... which ...". Then describe two people using a cut-down clause — "the man wearing...", "the woman standing...".
Bring several of today's structures together in one description.
Think of a person, place or organisation you know well — a relative, a neighbour, a company you've worked for, a club you belong to.
Talk about them out loud for one minute. Try to include:
Write a short paragraph (3–5 sentences) about the same person, place or organisation. Try to use whose, of which/of whom, a fronted preposition + which/whom, and a comment with ", which...". The checker will tell you which ones it finds.
Real life doesn't tell you which structure to use. Here everything is mixed — you decide.
Each sentence has one grammar mistake. Rewrite the whole sentence correctly.
1. "That's the man to who I lent my car."
2. "We hired ten graduates, three whom had internship experience."
3. "It's an old bridge who's stones came from a Roman quarry."
4. "The letter writing by my grandmother is now in a museum."
5. "The band cancelled the show at the last minute, ___ left thousands of fans furious."
6. "She's the colleague ___ I've always got on best."
7. "The team includes six engineers, ___ have worked here for over a decade."
One-minute challenge: describe your workplace or place of study. Mention someone with "... to whom ..." or "... with whom ...", part of a group with "... of whom/of which", and one thing "whose" describes.
1. A relative adverb you already know — complete it: "The restaurant we ate last night has just opened a second branch."
2. Say it out loud: what's the difference between a defining and a non-defining relative clause? Give one example of each.
3. The firm's reputation has suffered badly this year.
"It's a firm reputation has suffered badly this year."
4. The report contains forty recommendations. Only twelve have been acted on so far.
"The report contains forty recommendations, have already been acted on."
5. You owe your whole career to a particular professor.
"The professor I owe my whole career started out as a school teacher."
Which practice helped you most today — fixing the mistakes, choosing the right structure, or the speaking tasks? Say why you think that one worked for you.
At the start we said: five ways to add precise detail with relative clauses. Tick what's true: