Consolidate learning across Themes D & E through retrieval practice,
recall tasks, and structured exam-style questions. Track your understanding.
Quick Recall: Key Concepts
Test yourself on Themes D & E. Click each card to reveal the answer.
Beatitudes (Matthew 5:9)
πTap to reveal
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God."
Shows that Christian peace work is not passive avoidance but active reconciliation.
Surah 8:61
πTap to reveal
"And if they incline towards peace, then incline towards it [also]."
Teaches that Muslims must accept and pursue peace whenever possible.
Just War Theory (7 Criteria)
πTap to reveal
Just cause, legitimate authority, right intention, last resort, proportionality,
discrimination, probability of success. Framework for assessing moral permissibility of war.
Lesser Jihad vs. Greater Jihad
πTap to reveal
Greater Jihad: Internal spiritual struggle against evil. Lesser Jihad:
External military struggle, only in self-defence with strict rules. Greater Jihad is primary.
Discrimination (in warfare)
πTap to reveal
Duty to distinguish combatants from civilians. WMDs violate discrimination because they
kill indiscriminately.
The Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25β37)
πTap to reveal
Parable showing that neighbourly love (and duty to help refugees) transcends ethnic
and religious boundaries.
Surah 9:6 (Refugee Rights)
πTap to reveal
"If any one of the polytheists asks you for protection, grant it to him."
Shows Islamic duty to provide asylum regardless of religion.
Ten Commandments (Exodus 20)
πTap to reveal
Foundation of Christian ethics. Covers worship, respect, life, truth. Crime violates
God's law; all crime is sin (but not all sin is crime).
Qisas: Retaliatory punishment (eye for eye). Diyah: Compensation
(blood money). Qur'an prefers diyah and forgiveness over qisas.
Four Purposes of Punishment
πTap to reveal
Retribution (punish equally), deterrence (warn others), reform (rehabilitate),
protection (incapacitate/isolate). Modern justice blends all four.
Taubah (Islamic Repentance)
πTap to reveal
Sincere repentance for sin. Islamic theology: taubah is always possible and forgiven
by Allah. Offenders deserve path to redemption.
Exam Practice: Sample Questions
Section A: Multiple Choice (1 mark each)
1. Which of these is a principle of Just War Theory?
War is justified if it increases national wealth
War must be a last resort after all peaceful options are exhausted
War must target civilians to spread fear
War requires no approval from any authority
Answer: b
2. What does Surah 8:61 teach about peace?
Peace is weakness and Muslims should always fight
Muslims must accept and pursue peace whenever possible
Peace is only for non-Muslims
Peace requires abandoning Islamic faith
Answer: b
3. In the Good Samaritan parable, why is the Samaritan's action significant?
Samaritans were superior to other groups
He helped despite ethnic/religious difference, showing love transcends boundaries
He was rich enough to afford helping
Only Samaritans understand Christian ethics
Answer: b
4. Which is a purpose of punishment that aims at changing the offender's behaviour?
Retribution
Deterrence
Reform
Protection
Answer: c
5. What is diyah in Islamic law?
The death penalty
Compensation paid to victim's family
A type of prayer
A form of government
Answer: b
Section B: Short Answer (3 marks each)
6. Explain how Christian teaching on forgiveness (e.g., Lord's Prayer) differs from a purely retributive
approach to crime.
Model answer: The Lord's Prayer teaches "Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors."
This prioritizes mercy and transformation over punishment equal to the crime. Retributive justice focuses on
ensuring the offender suffers as much as their victim; Christian theology believes offenders can be redeemed
through forgiveness and should be given opportunity for reform rather than permanent punishment.
7. Why do many Islamic scholars argue that capital punishment should be avoided, even though Qisas
permits it?
Model answer: Surah 42:40 explicitly teaches that forgiveness is superior to retaliation.
Victims' families can choose diyah (compensation) instead of qisas (execution). Taubah (sincere repentance)
is central to Islamic theologyβan offender who repents deserves mercy. Many scholars argue that modern prisons
can achieve protection and justice without executions, making capital punishment unnecessary and incompatible
with Islamic values of mercy.
Section C: Extended Response (10 marks)
8. Evaluate the extent to which Christian and Islamic teachings support pacifism.
Guidance:
Discuss Christian teaching: Jesus taught forgiveness and non-violence (Matthew 5:9, Luke 10:27); Quakers
practice absolute pacifism
BUT: Just War Theory developed by Thomas Aquinas permits some wars under strict conditions
Discuss Islamic teaching: Surah 8:61 teaches peace should be pursued; Greater Jihad is primary
BUT: Lesser Jihad permits defensive military struggle under conditions
Conclusion: Both traditions value peace but allow defensive warfare; neither mandates absolute pacifism
(though some groups within each do)
Timed Assessment: 45 Minutes
Total: 30 marks
Time remaining:
45:00
Instructions:
You have 45 minutes to complete all sections below
Answer all questions
Use evidence from religious texts and teachings
Write clearly; marks awarded for depth and accuracy
Section A: Recall (5 marks)
Name and briefly explain THREE key differences between Christian and Islamic approaches to peace and conflict.
Words: 0/200
Section B: Application (10 marks)
A nation uses weapons of mass destruction as a deterrent against invasion. Using Just War Theory and Islamic
teachings on Lesser Jihad, explain why this would be ethically problematic.
Words: 0/250
Section C: Evaluation (15 marks)
Assess the view that religious teachings on crime and punishment are incompatible with modern justice systems.
Consider: Christian redemption theology vs. retribution; Islamic forgiveness vs. qisas; four purposes of
punishment; examples like TRC (South Africa) that blend religious and secular approaches.
Words: 0/400
Extended Writing: Exemplary Response
Question: With reference to Christian and Islamic teachings, evaluate the extent to which
religious perspectives support or oppose the use of military force.
Model Response (A-grade standard)
Both Christianity and Islam contain resources for both supporting and opposing military force,
reflecting complexity within each tradition.
Supporting military force: Christian Just War Theory (Aquinas) permits war if it meets seven
criteria: just cause, legitimate authority, right intention, last resort, proportionality, discrimination,
probability of success. This framework allows self-defence and protection of innocent people. Similarly, Islamic
law permits Lesser Jihad (military struggle) in defensive circumstances, when authorised by legitimate leadership,
and subject to strict rules protecting non-combatants and requiring mercy.
Opposing military force: Christian tradition includes absolute pacifism (Quakers, Mennonites).
Jesus taught forgiveness ("forgive seventy times seven") and non-violence ("put your sword back"). Modern Christianity
increasingly opposes military force, especially WMDs, which violate Just War criteria on discrimination and proportionality.
Islamic tradition emphasises Greater Jihad (spiritual struggle) as primary and requires all peaceful alternatives be
exhausted before Lesser Jihad. Surah 8:61 mandates accepting peace offers.
Conclusion: Both traditions permit defensive military force under strict conditions, but prioritise
peace and forgiveness. Modern contexts make it harder to meet these criteria; consequently, many religious leaders
(Pope Francis, Muslim scholars) increasingly advocate pacifism or extreme caution in deploying force.
Why this is A-grade:
Shows nuance: acknowledges complexity within each tradition
Cites specific sources (Jesus, Aquinas, Qur'an verses)
Explains both sides fairly before evaluating
Makes a clear, supported judgement
Connects ancient teaching to modern context
Now write your own:
Words: 0/600
Self-Assessment: How Ready Are You?
Rate yourself on each outcome:
Theme D: Religion, Peace and Conflict
Peace, justice, reconciliation: Can you explain Christian peacemaking (Quakers, Just War)
and Muslim views (Surah 8:61, greater jihad)? Can you discuss forgiveness (Lord's Prayer, Surah 42:40)?
War and WMDs: Can you apply Just War criteria to modern conflicts? Can you explain why WMDs
violate Just War principles? Can you distinguish Lesser Jihad from "holy war"?
Victims and peace orgs: Can you discuss religious duty to refugees (Good Samaritan, Surah 9:6)?
Can you name and explain peace organisations (UN, Red Cross/Crescent, Christian Aid, Islamic Relief)?
Theme E: Religion, Crime and Punishment
Crime and punishment: Can you explain Christian views on sin and crime? Shari'ah law and its
components? Four purposes of punishment and examples?
Death penalty: Can you compare Christian abolition (Vatican II) with Islamic qisas/diyah?
Can you discuss forgiveness cases (Tutu, Wilson)?
Action: If you rated yourself "Not sure" on any outcome, revisit that lesson before the exam.
Final Summary: Themes D & E
Theme D β Religion, Peace and Conflict:
Lesson 1: Christian peacemaking (Quakers, Just War, Matthew 5:9) and Muslim approaches
(Surah 8:61, greater/lesser jihad). Forgiveness (Lord's Prayer, Surah 42:40) enables reconciliation.
Lesson 2: Just War criteria (7 principles) and Holy War/Lesser Jihad. WMDs violate Just War
because they kill indiscriminately. Terrorism (targeting civilians) is condemned by both traditions.
Lesson 3: Religious duty to help refugees (Good Samaritan, Surah 9:6). Peace organisations
(UN, Red Cross, Christian Aid, Islamic Relief) provide neutral humanitarian aid. Religious leaders broker peace.
Theme E β Religion, Crime and Punishment:
Lesson 4: Christian sin vs. crime distinction. Shari'ah framework (hudud, qisas, diyah, ta'zir).
Four purposes of punishment: retribution, deterrence, reform, protection. Modern justice blends all four.
Lesson 5: Death penalty: Catholics/Protestants oppose it; Islam permits qisas but prefers
forgiveness/diyah. Cases (Tutu, Wilson) show power of Christian forgiveness and taubah (Islamic repentance).
Key skills for exam:
Compare Christian and Muslim perspectives (always discuss both)
Use specific scripture (Bible AND Qur'an)
Show diversity within traditions (not all Christians/Muslims agree)
Apply theory to real cases (Just War, Shari'ah, TRC, etc.)
Evaluate nuance: traditions have resources for both peace AND justified force, but prioritise peace
Exam techniques:
Read question carefullyβcheck if it asks for description, comparison, or evaluation
Quote relevant texts; explain what they mean in context
Use subject terminology (qisas, diyah, taubah, Just War, discrimination, etc.)
Make a clear judgement; don't just describe both sides