A teenage peasant girl who heard voices, crowned a king, and changed the course of a war.
Need an easier version? Read this lesson at A2/B1 level →
Before we read, let's unlock the words you'll need. Each one is hidden in a sentence. Read it aloud and say what you think the bold word means from the rest of the sentence — then reveal it and see how close you were.
Read each part. After it, there's a quick comprehension check (try the questions from memory first), then one thing to discuss.
She was born around 1412 in Domrémy, a small village in north-eastern France, the daughter of farming peasants. She could not read or write. By any ordinary measure, her life would be spent in the fields and the home — and history would never have learned her name. But France in those years was a country torn apart. For nearly a century it had been locked in what later generations would call the Hundred Years' War, a long and bitter struggle with England over land and, above all, over the French crown itself.
The crown was the heart of the dispute. An earlier treaty had handed the succession to the English king, pushing aside the French heir — the Dauphin, Charles. Much of northern France, including the city of Reims where French kings were traditionally crowned, was held by the English and their Burgundian allies. Charles, uncrowned and unsure of himself, controlled only the south, and his enemies mockingly called him the "King of Bourges."
Into this hopeless situation walked a teenage girl with an extraordinary claim. From the age of about thirteen, she said, she had been hearing voices — those of Saint Michael, Saint Catherine and Saint Margaret. They told her she had been chosen by God to drive the English out of France and to see the Dauphin crowned as the rightful king. She did not doubt them for a moment. She was certain she would do exactly what they had told her.
1. Why was the French crown in dispute, and what was Charles's weak position?
2. What did the voices tell her she had been chosen to do?
1. An earlier treaty had given the succession to the English king and pushed aside the French heir, the Dauphin Charles. England and its Burgundian allies held the north, including Reims; Charles, uncrowned, held only the south and was mocked as the "King of Bourges."
2. The voices of Saints Michael, Catherine and Margaret told her she had been chosen by God to drive the English out of France and to have the Dauphin crowned the rightful king.
Astonishingly, she got her audience. In early 1429 she travelled to the castle of Chinon and convinced the Dauphin to give her a chance — partly, it seems, because she was able to pick him out from his courtiers even though he had disguised himself to test her. She had cropped her hair, dressed in men's armour, and demanded to be sent to the besieged city of Orléans. To a court that had run out of options, this strange, fearless girl began to look less like a madwoman and more like a sign from heaven.
At Orléans she was less a general than a symbol — but what a symbol. Carrying her white banner rather than a sword, she gave the exhausted French army something it had not felt in years: belief. Within days the siege that had held for months was broken, and on 8 May 1429 the English withdrew. The victory electrified France. She then pressed Charles to march on Reims through enemy territory, insisting he was going to be crowned there as the voices had promised.
And he was. On 17 July 1429, in Reims cathedral, Charles was anointed and crowned King Charles VII, with Joan standing close by, holding her banner. A peasant girl had made a king. For a few short months, everything she had predicted had come true, and she stood at the height of her fame.
1. How did she win the Dauphin's trust, and what was her role at Orléans?
2. What did she insist Charles do after Orléans, and what happened on 17 July 1429?
1. At Chinon she convinced the Dauphin to give her a chance (reportedly picking him out despite his disguise). At Orléans she acted as a symbol and an inspiration, carrying a banner rather than fighting; the months-long siege was broken and the English withdrew on 8 May 1429.
2. She insisted he march to Reims to be crowned. On 17 July 1429 Charles was crowned King Charles VII in Reims cathedral, with Joan beside him.
Triumph did not last. In May 1430, while defending the town of Compiègne, she was captured by Burgundian soldiers. Her own king, the man she had crowned, did nothing to ransom her. Instead the Burgundians sold her to the English for a large sum of money, and her enemies finally had her where they wanted her.
They could not punish her simply for defeating them, so they put her on trial for heresy at Rouen — accusing her, among other things, of falsely claiming to speak for God and of wearing men's clothing. The court was led by clergymen loyal to the English, and the outcome was never really in doubt. After months of questioning, she was condemned. On 30 May 1431, she was burned at the stake in the marketplace at Rouen. She was only about nineteen years old.
But her story did not end there. In 1456, a second hearing examined the case again and nullified the original verdict, declaring the trial unjust and her conviction void. Over the centuries that followed, the illiterate village girl became one of the most powerful symbols France would ever know — and in 1920, nearly five hundred years after her death, the Church canonised her as a saint. The enemies who burned her are long forgotten; the girl they tried to erase echoes louder than ever.
1. How did she end up in English hands, and what was she put on trial for?
2. What happened to her reputation after her death in 1431?
1. She was captured by Burgundian soldiers at Compiègne in 1430; Charles did not ransom her, and the Burgundians sold her to the English. She was put on trial for heresy at Rouen and condemned, then burned at the stake on 30 May 1431, aged about nineteen.
2. In 1456 a second hearing nullified the verdict and declared the trial unjust. She became a great national symbol, and in 1920 the Church canonised her as a saint.
Six centuries on, Joan is still an argument. Did she really hear saints? How did an illiterate girl read a battlefield? When we look back at evidence and try to explain it, English has a precise set of forms for it: modal verb + have + past participle. They let us weigh how certain we are about something that is already over.
Use must have + pp when the evidence makes you almost sure something was true, and can't have / couldn't have + pp when it makes you sure something was not possible.
1. She walked calmly to the stake, so she (be) terrified of death the way most people are.
2. To convince a whole court and an army, she (have) an extraordinary presence.
3. The judges already knew their verdict, so the trial (be) truly fair.
1. can't have been / couldn't have been (her calm makes ordinary terror seem impossible)
2. must have had (near-certain deduction from what she achieved)
3. can't have been / couldn't have been (a rigged verdict rules out fairness)
Use might / may / could have + pp for a possibility you genuinely can't decide — the heart of any debate about a mysterious figure.
1. Her voices (be) genuine visions, or something her own mind produced.
2. Charles (ransom) her, but chose to abandon her instead.
3. Without Joan, the Dauphin (never / reach) Reims at all.
1. might have been / may have been / could have been
2. could have ransomed / might have ransomed
3. might never have reached / may never have reached
Fill each gap with the form the certainty needs. Read it aloud once you've finished, then say whether you agree.
A village girl (read) a battlefield by training — she had none — so something else was at work. She (be) a gifted natural leader, or the soldiers simply believed she was sent by God. She (have) genuine conviction, that much seems clear; but her judges (intend) to give her a fair hearing — the result was decided in advance.
can't have read / couldn't have read (impossible) · might have been / may have been / could have been (open possibility) · must have had (near-certain) · can't have intended / couldn't have intended (impossible, given the rigged result)
Notice how the modal carries the certainty: the same "have + past participle" can mean sure, impossible, or merely possible.
This language of deduction is the backbone of any argument about a debated, half-known figure — exactly what you'll need in the Speak tab.
You've read the story and you have the words — so now the real thing is within reach. There's a full podcast episode that tells this story in much greater depth, in natural, real-speed English.
From the Noiser podcast network. Hosted by historians, roughly 50 minutes.
Listen on Spotify →This is the heart of the lesson — do all four out loud. The timer is there to keep you going: fill the time with detail rather than escaping it.
Tell the story of Joan of Arc in your own words, as if to someone who has never heard of her. Move through the arc: the peasant girl and her voices → the disputed crown → Chinon and the Dauphin → the siege of Orléans → the coronation at Reims → capture, trial and the stake → nullification and sainthood.
Speculate about her motives and her mind as you tell it: what must she have believed? What can't she have known? What might have driven her? Use at least five key words from the lesson (siege, providence, heir, coronation, heresy, tribunal, nullify, canonise, martyr).
Joan was certain her voices were real and divine. Some saw a saint; some saw a clever symbol; some today might wonder about her mind. Build an argument: was her conviction faith, illusion, or a kind of leadership genius — and does it even matter, given what she achieved?
Tell the story of any other young person who changed history against the odds — an activist, an inventor, a leader, a figure from your own country's past. Use the same shape: where they came from, the moment that made them, what they achieved, and what it cost them. Speculate as you go about what they must / might / can't have felt or known at the turning points.
Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it: