SHORT HISTORY, LONG ECHOES · B2/C1 · 50 min

Machu Picchu

A royal city in the clouds — built, abandoned, and hidden from the world for centuries.

Today: you'll tell the story of a city built, lost and found again, and discuss who really "discovers" a place — using passive reporting structures (it is believed that…, is thought to have been…) to report what people still say about its purpose, and the language of empire and engineering.

Key words — guess first, then sort

Before we read, let's unlock the words you'll need. Each one is hidden in a sentence. Read it aloud and say what you think the bold word means from the rest of the sentence — then reveal it and see how close you were.

1. The Inca ruled a vast empire that stretched for thousands of miles down the spine of the Andes, governed from their capital at Cusco.
an empire (n) — a large group of lands and peoples ruled by a single state or emperor.
2. Far above the valley, the Inca cut wide flat steps into the mountainside — terraces where they could grow maize and potatoes without the soil washing away.
terraces (n) — flat, level platforms cut into a slope for farming or building.
3. Across the Andes, Inca masons worked with stone hewn by hand — granite cut and shaped into great blocks, the surface still bearing the marks of their labour.
to hew (v) — to cut and shape stone or wood with hard, deliberate effort. (hew · hewed · hewn)
4. The dynasty founded by Pachacuti did not last: within three generations of his death, Spanish steel had toppled it and scattered his heirs.
a dynasty (n) — a succession of rulers from the same family, holding power across many generations.
5. At the roadside shrine, travellers lit candles, bowed their heads, and left small offerings of flowers before the painted image of their god.
a shrine (n) — a holy place dedicated to a god, a saint or the sacred dead.
6. Spanish soldiers came to the Andes hungry for conquest — for silver, for gold, and for land to claim in the name of a distant king.
a conquest (n) — the act of taking control of a land or people by force. (verb: to conquer)
7. One harsh winter the miners gave up and left, and the whole town stood derelict, its doors banging in the wind and weeds pushing up through the streets.
derelict (adj) — abandoned and left to fall into ruin through neglect.
8. Nobody had touched the garden in years, and now the weeds were utterly rampant: brambles buried the bench, and ivy had climbed clear over the gate.
rampant (adj) — (of plants, disease or disorder) growing or spreading unchecked and out of control.
9. A photograph and a famous name can lift a forgotten place to sudden prominence, putting somewhere the wider world had never heard of onto every map.
prominence (n) — the state of being widely known, noticed or important.
10. Tourists gathered at the foot of the ancient edifice, craning their necks at the weathered stone columns that had towered over the city for two thousand years.
an edifice (n) — a large, imposing building or structure, especially an old or grand one.

Now sort them — out loud

Group the ten words before we read:
  • Sort all ten into three groups — Building & engineering / Empire & life / Loss & rediscovery — and say aloud why you placed each word where you did. (Some could fit in more than one group — defend your choice.)
  • Using any three of the words, predict: what kind of story are we about to read?

The story, in three parts

Read each part. After it, there's a quick comprehension check (try the questions from memory first), then one thing to discuss.

Part 1 — A city for an emperor

By the middle of the fifteenth century, the Inca ruled the largest empire the Americas had ever seen — a realm of perhaps twelve million people, stretching some four thousand miles along the Andes, all governed from the mountain capital of Cusco. The man who had driven much of that expansion was the emperor Pachacuti, a ruler remembered as a kind of founder, the one who turned a regional kingdom into an empire.

It was almost certainly Pachacuti who, around 1450, ordered a new royal estate to be built on a high ridge above the Urubamba river, roughly eighty kilometres from Cusco. We know it today as Machu Picchu. It was never a city in the ordinary sense, and it was never meant to hold a large population. It was a private mountain retreat for the emperor, his family and his court — a place to host feasts, perform ceremonies, and display the wealth and reach of his lineage.

What makes it extraordinary is how it was made. Inca builders had no iron tools, no wheel and no mortar, yet they cut and fitted enormous blocks of granite so precisely that the joints are almost invisible. They carved hundreds of terraces into the steep slope to grow food and hold the mountain in place, and they channelled fresh spring water through stone fountains across the whole site. On a carved outcrop stood the Intihuatana, a shaped stone that tracked the sun — at the heart of a place built as much for the gods as for the emperor.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. Who probably ordered Machu Picchu to be built, and what was it for?

2. What was remarkable about how the Inca built it, given the tools they had?

1. The emperor Pachacuti, around 1450. It was a royal estate — a private mountain retreat for the emperor and his court, for feasts, ceremonies and displaying his lineage's power — not an ordinary city.

2. With no iron tools, no wheel and no mortar, they cut and fitted huge granite blocks so precisely the joints are almost invisible, carved hundreds of farming terraces, and ran spring water through stone fountains.

Discuss:
  • The Inca achieved this with no iron, no wheel and no writing as we know it. What does that suggest about how we judge whether a society is "advanced"?

Part 2 — Emptied and forgotten

Machu Picchu was lived in for only about eighty years. Then, in the 1530s, the world that had built it came apart. The Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro landed on the Pacific coast in 1532, and with a tiny force, steel weapons, horses and — above all — the European diseases that ran ahead of him, he tore the Inca empire apart with astonishing speed. The emperor was captured and killed; Cusco fell; and the structures of Inca power collapsed within a few short years.

Somewhere in that upheaval, Machu Picchu was quietly abandoned. We do not know exactly why or exactly when — perhaps its royal purpose simply ended with the dynasty that owned it. But here is the crucial twist: the Spanish never found it. Tucked high on its ridge, far from the main roads, it slipped out of the conquerors' reach entirely. And because they never found it, they never looted it and never tore it down, as they did with so many Inca temples elsewhere.

So Machu Picchu was left to the mountain. The terraces emptied, the fountains fell silent, and the forest closed over the stone. For nearly four hundred years it sat there, overgrown and forgotten by the outside world — though never entirely forgotten by the local people who farmed those slopes, some of whom went on living quietly among the ruins.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What happened to the Inca empire in the 1530s, and who led the Spanish conquest?

2. Why does it matter so much that the Spanish never found Machu Picchu?

1. Francisco Pizarro landed in 1532 and, with steel weapons, horses and European diseases, destroyed the empire within a few years — the emperor was killed and Cusco fell.

2. Because they never found it, they never looted or destroyed it, as they did to Inca temples elsewhere — so it survived intact rather than in ruins.

Discuss:
  • Machu Picchu survived precisely because it was lost. Can you think of other things — places, ideas, even people — that were protected by being forgotten?

Part 3 — Brought back to the world

In July 1911 an American historian and explorer, Hiram Bingham, was searching the cloud forest for the last city of the Inca. A local farmer, Melchor Arteaga, agreed to lead him up the steep ridge to some ruins the local families already knew well. Near the top, Bingham met farmers living among the stones — and it was a small boy from one of those families who walked him through the overgrown terraces to the heart of the site.

So Bingham did not "discover" Machu Picchu in any honest sense. The people of the valley had never lost it; an earlier visitor had even left his name scratched on a wall years before. What Bingham did do was photograph it, write about it, and bring it to the world's attention — backed by Yale University and National Geographic — so that a place the wider world had never heard of suddenly became famous everywhere. The word "discovery" did a great deal of quiet work, erasing the guides who already knew the way.

From there, Machu Picchu's fame only grew. It was made a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1983 and voted one of the New Seven Wonders of the World in 2007. Today around a million and a half visitors a year climb to the ridge — so many that Peru now limits the crowds to protect the stone. The royal estate that was built to be private, then lost for four centuries, has become one of the most visited and most photographed monuments on earth.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What did Hiram Bingham actually do in 1911 — and why is "discovered" the wrong word?

2. How famous has Machu Picchu become since then?

1. Led by a local farmer (Melchor Arteaga) and guided through the ruins by a local boy, he photographed the site and brought it to world attention. "Discovered" is wrong because local families had always known it — they had never lost it.

2. It became a UNESCO World Heritage Site (1983) and a New Seven Wonder of the World (2007), and now draws around 1.5 million visitors a year — so many that numbers must be limited.

Discuss:
  • If local people had always known the site, what does it really mean to say someone "discovered" it? Who gets remembered, and who gets left out?

The grammar this story runs on: passive reporting structures

Nobody can be certain why Machu Picchu was built or why it was abandoned. When we report what people in general believe — without naming who — English uses passive reporting structures. They let you state a theory carefully, signalling "this is widely said, not proven." Perfect for a lost city whose purpose is still debated.

The two patterns:
• Pattern A — It + is + believed/thought/said + that + clause. The whole idea sits in the that-clause: "It is believed that Machu Picchu was a royal retreat." "It is thought that the city was abandoned within a century."
• Pattern B — Subject + is + thought/believed/said + to + infinitive (for now) or to have + past participle (for the past). The subject moves to the front: "Machu Picchu is thought to have been a royal retreat." "Its purpose is still said to be a mystery."
Both report the same belief; Pattern B simply foregrounds the thing you're talking about. Use to + infinitive for a present state and to have + past participle for the past.

1. Pattern A — It is believed that…

Report each theory about the city with it + is + believed / thought / said + that + a clause. Choose the reporting verb that fits the certainty.

1. It (believe) that Machu Picchu (be) a royal retreat for the emperor.

2. It (think) that the city (be) abandoned within a century of being built.

3. It (say) that the stonework (fit) together so tightly that no blade can pass between the blocks.

1. is believed / was

2. is thought / was

3. is said / fits

2. Pattern B — X is thought to be / to have been…

Now move the subject to the front: subject + is + thought / believed / said + to + infinitive (a present state) or to have + past participle (the past).

1. Machu Picchu (think) to (be) a private estate for Pachacuti's court. (past)

2. Its true purpose (say) to (be) a mystery even now. (present)

3. Hiram Bingham (believe) to (rely) on local guides who already knew the way. (past)

1. is thought / to have been

2. is said / to be

3. is believed / to have relied

3. Rewrite — switch between the patterns

Take the same belief and report it both ways. Fill the gap so each pair means the same thing. Read both aloud.

1. It is thought that the Inca tracked the sun from the Intihuatana. → The Inca (think) to (track) the sun from the Intihuatana.

2. The city is believed to have been emptied after the conquest. → It (believe) that the city (empty) after the conquest.

1. are thought / to have tracked

2. is believed / was emptied

Notice how Pattern B lets you put the thing you're discussing first, then report the belief about it.

This is the passive-reporting strand — the careful "it is believed that…" language you'll use to report theories about a mystery in the Speak tab without claiming them as fact.

Hear it for real

You've read the story and you have the words — so now the real thing is within reach. There's a full podcast episode that tells this story in much greater depth, in natural, real-speed English.

🎧 Heard it already? Then treat everything so far as your recap — and listen out below for the extra detail the episode adds. Haven't? You've lost nothing: you now know the story and the key vocabulary, which is exactly what makes a fast native podcast suddenly followable. Listen before next time.

Short History Of… Machu Picchu

From the Noiser podcast network. Hosted by historians, roughly 50 minutes.

Listen on Spotify →

Listen out for — and bring back to talk about

As you listen (now or for homework):
  • The episode goes deeper into how the Inca actually built and ran the site — the engineering, the water, the stone. What detail surprised you most?
  • Find one detail the episode adds that this lesson didn't tell you — a person, a place, or a moment — and be ready to explain it in your own words.
  • Listen for two or three of today's key words used naturally by the historians (empire, terraces, dynasty, conquest, derelict…). How did they use them?

Speak

This is the heart of the lesson — do all four out loud. The timer is there to keep you going: fill the time with detail rather than escaping it.

Useful language: reach for passive reporting to report theories without naming who: "It is believed that…", "… is thought to have been…", "It is said that…", "No one knows for certain, but…". For opinions, try: "What's striking is…", "You could argue that…", "It's no accident that…", "On one level… but on another…".
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Tell the whole story (4 minutes)

Tell the story of Machu Picchu in your own words, as if to someone who has never heard of it. Move through the arc: the Inca empire and Pachacuti → the royal estate and how it was built → the Spanish conquest and the abandonment → the four lost centuries → Bingham, the guides, and world fame.

Use at least five key words from the lesson (empire, terraces, hewn, dynasty, shrine, conquest, derelict, rampant, prominence, edifice), and slip in at least one passive reporting structure ("It is believed that…", "… is thought to have been…").

Task B · Report the theories about the mystery (4 minutes)

We still don't know for certain why Machu Picchu was built or why it was abandoned. Report the competing theories without naming who holds them — use passive reporting throughout: "It is believed that it was a royal retreat…", "Some say it was a religious site…", "It is thought to have been abandoned because…", "Its purpose is still said to be a mystery." Lay out at least three different explanations and say which you find most convincing — and why.

Task C · A parallel mystery — what people believe (4 minutes)

Choose another place, object or event whose true story is still debated — a ruin, a shipwreck, a painting, a famous unsolved puzzle, even a local legend. Report what people believe about it without saying who: how it is thought to have begun, what it is said to have been for, why it is believed to have ended the way it did. Keep your passive reporting structures doing the work ("It is believed that…", "… is thought to have been…").

Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it:

  • The terracotta army near Xi'an — it is believed to have been built to guard an emperor in the afterlife, though its full purpose is still said to be uncertain.
  • Stonehenge — it is variously thought to have been a temple, a burial ground, or an astronomical calendar; no one knows for certain what it was for.
  • The Nazca Lines in Peru — they are said to have been made for the gods to see from above, but it is still debated why a people would carve images they could never view themselves.
  • The lost colony of Roanoke — the settlers are thought to have vanished into the surrounding land, though it is still believed by some that they were lost to disease or attack.
  • A legend or unsolved story from your own country — a vanished person, a ruin, a buried treasure. Report what people are said to believe happened, without claiming to know.
  • An object in a family or museum whose origin nobody is sure of — it is thought to have come from one place, but is said by others to have a different story entirely.

To finish — the bigger questions

  1. Machu Picchu survived because it was lost. Are some things better left undisturbed — and is there a cost to dragging everything into the light?
  2. A million and a half people a year now climb a ridge built for a single royal family. Can a place this fragile survive its own fame?
  3. History remembers Bingham's name, not his guides'. Whose names get written down, and whose get erased — and why does it matter?
  4. Before you go — from memory: how do we report what people believe without saying who believes it? Give the two patterns and an example of each — e.g. "It is believed that Machu Picchu was a royal retreat" and "Machu Picchu is thought to have been a royal retreat."