A young merchant who came home with the most famous travel story ever told — and a question that has never gone away: did he really go?
Need an easier version? Read this lesson at A2/B1 level →
Before we read, let's unlock the words you'll need. Each one is hidden in a sentence. Read it aloud and say what you think the bold word means from the rest of the sentence — then reveal it and see how close you were.
Read each part. After it, there's a quick comprehension check (try the questions from memory first), then one thing to discuss.
Marco Polo was born in Venice around 1254, into a family of merchants who traded across the known world. His father, Niccolò, and his uncle Maffeo had already journeyed deep into Asia and come back with tales of the court of the Mongols. So when they set out east again in 1271, they took the teenage Marco with them. He was perhaps seventeen years old, and the journey ahead would swallow the whole of his youth.
The road was the network of caravan routes later generations would call the Silk Road — months of mountains, deserts and trading cities, of danger, sickness and slow, grinding distance. After three or four years of travel, the Polos finally reached the realm of Kublai Khan, grandson of Genghis Khan and Mongol emperor of China. They had crossed half the world to stand in his court.
Kublai Khan, it is said, was charmed by the sharp young Venetian. Marco was clever, observant, and good with languages, and the emperor reportedly took him into his service. For something like seventeen years Marco stayed in the East, sent out as an envoy across the empire and bringing back reports of the provinces, the cities and the customs he found there.
1. Who did Marco travel with in 1271, and why was the family suited to such a journey?
2. Whose court did the Polos eventually reach, and what role did Marco come to play there?
1. He travelled with his father Niccolò and his uncle Maffeo, who had already been deep into Asia. They were Venetian merchants, used to long-distance trade — so a journey east along the caravan routes was an extension of the family business.
2. They reached the court of Kublai Khan, the Mongol emperor of China. Marco reportedly entered the Khan's service and was sent out as an envoy to report on different parts of the empire.
After roughly twenty-four years away, Marco came home to a Venice that barely remembered him. He had returned a wealthy man, but his greatest fortune was the one he could not yet see: the story locked inside his head. That story might have stayed there, half-told at dinner tables, had fate not intervened in a strange way.
Venice was at war with the rival city of Genoa, and Marco was captured and thrown into a Genoese prison. There he met a fellow prisoner named Rustichello da Pisa, a writer of romances. To pass the long, idle months, Marco dictated his travels and Rustichello wrote them down. The result was a book Europe came to know as The Travels of Marco Polo — also called Il Milione, "The Million."
It was a sensation. In an age before printing, the manuscript was copied by hand and spread across Europe, describing marvels its readers could scarcely believe: a city of impossible size and wealth, stones that burned (coal), and money made of paper. For generations it was the West's richest window onto the East. Two centuries later, a Genoese sailor named Christopher Columbus owned a copy, scribbled notes in its margins, and sailed west hoping to reach the very lands Marco had described. The book had become a map of the imagination.
1. How did Marco's story come to be written down at all?
2. Why was the book so influential, and what later explorer did it help inspire?
1. Captured in Venice's war with Genoa, Marco was imprisoned and met the writer Rustichello da Pisa. Marco dictated his travels and Rustichello wrote them down, producing The Travels of Marco Polo.
2. Copied by hand and spread widely, it gave Europe its richest picture of Asia — its wealth, cities and wonders. Among many it inspired was Christopher Columbus, who owned and annotated a copy and sailed west hoping to reach those lands.
Here the story turns into an argument that has lasted seven hundred years. Almost from the start, people were sceptical. The book was so full of riches and round numbers that the nickname Il Milione may have been half a joke — Marco of the Million Lies. On his deathbed in 1324, friends are said to have begged him to take back his tall tales. He reportedly refused, insisting he had not told the half of what he saw.
Modern doubters have pressed the case further. If Marco truly spent years criss-crossing China, why does his book never mention the Great Wall? Why no tea, no chopsticks, no Chinese writing, no foot-binding — the very things a European could hardly have missed? Some scholars argue he never reached China at all, and instead pieced his account together from Persian and Arabic guidebooks picked up at trading posts nearer home.
Yet the case for Marco is strong too. He describes paper money, the burning of coal, and the workings of Mongol salt taxes and currency with a precision that fits the records remarkably well — details a stay-at-home faker would have struggled to invent. So the debate runs on. He must have seen something extraordinary to describe it so exactly; yet he can't have got everything right, or remembered it all perfectly, decades later in a prison cell. Perhaps the truth is the most human answer of all: a real journey, a real wonder, and a storyteller who could never quite resist making a good tale better.
1. What things in (and missing from) the book make some people doubt he reached China?
2. What evidence pulls the other way, suggesting he really did see what he described?
1. The doubts: the book omits things a traveller in China could hardly miss — the Great Wall, tea, chopsticks, Chinese writing, foot-binding — and is full of huge, suspicious numbers. Some argue he gathered the account second-hand from Persian and Arabic sources.
2. The defence: his accurate descriptions of paper money, burning coal, and the detail of Mongol salt taxes and currency match the historical records very closely — hard to fake from guidebooks alone.
Marco Polo's whole legacy is a book of wonders that no one could check — a tale of a court richer than Europe, of cities and creatures few would ever see. When you retell a claim like that, you often want to pass it on without swearing it is true. English has a neat set of tools for exactly that: distancing language, the grammar of "don't blame me if it's wrong."
Add apparently, allegedly, supposedly or reportedly so each claim about Marco is reported at arm's length — true to the meaning in brackets. (More than one may fit.)
1. Marco Polo served the great Khan for seventeen years. (so people say — you weren't there)
2. He brought back the secret of paper money. (it's claimed, but unproven)
3. the city he described had a thousand bridges. (according to his book — who knows)
1. Apparently / Supposedly / Reportedly (front position, comma after — flags hearsay)
2. allegedly / supposedly / reportedly (mid-position, before the verb — an unproven claim)
3. Apparently / Supposedly / Reportedly
Rewrite each claim with the passive reporting frame is said / believed / rumoured to. Use to + infinitive for a general fact, to have + past participle for a finished one.
1. People say he saw cities richer than any in Europe. → He cities richer than any in Europe.
2. Many believe he never reached China at all. → He China at all.
3. There's a rumour he dictated the book from a prison cell. → He the book from a prison cell.
1. is said to have seen (finished action → to have + past participle)
2. is believed never to have reached (believed + to have + past participle)
3. is rumoured to have dictated
Complete each line with a distancing phrase — by all accounts, so the story goes, supposedly — so you report the doubters and the deathbed scene without vouching for either.
1. , few of his neighbours believed a word of it.
2. On his deathbed, , he swore he had not told the half of it.
3. The riches he described were real — .
1. By all accounts (opens the claim as widely-reported)
2. so the story goes (flags a tale you're passing on, not confirming)
3. or so the story goes / supposedly (distances you from the truth of it)
This is the distancing-language stop on the grammar strand — the same tools you'll use in the Speak tab to report Marco's wonders without swearing they're true.
You've read the story and you have the words — so now the real thing is within reach. There's a full podcast episode that tells this story in much greater depth, in natural, real-speed English.
From the Noiser podcast network. Hosted by historians, roughly 50 minutes.
Listen on Spotify →This is the heart of the lesson — do all four out loud. The timer is there to keep you going: fill the time with detail rather than escaping it.
Tell the story of Marco Polo in your own words, as if to someone who has never heard of him. Move through the arc: the merchant family → the road east in 1271 → the court of Kublai Khan → twenty-four years away → the Genoese prison and Rustichello → the book and its legacy → the lasting doubt.
Tell the wildest parts at arm's length — report the legend without swearing it's true. Reach for distancing language ("apparently…", "he is said to have…", "by all accounts…") and at least five key words from the lesson (haggle, caravan, realm, envoy, marvel, manuscript, embellish, sceptical, discrepancy, legacy).
Hold the debate yourself. Lay out the case against Marco (the missing Great Wall, tea and chopsticks; the wild numbers) and the case for him (the paper money, the coal, the accurate Mongol taxes). Report each disputed claim at arm's length — "he is said to have…", "apparently…", "by all accounts…", "supposedly… — though no one knows for sure" — and then say where you come down.
Every culture has a famous traveller's tale that grew in the telling — an explorer, a sailor, a national legend, or even a relative whose holiday stories get bigger every year. Retell one such story without vouching for a word of it: hold the doubtful claims at arm's length with distancing language ("apparently…", "they're said to have…", "by all accounts…", "or so the story goes"), so your listener hears the legend while you stay safely uncommitted to its truth.
Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it: