H. G. Wells's fable of a sighted man who walks into a valley where sight means nothing — and learns that the majority makes the rules.
Need an easier version? Read this story at A2/B1 level →
Each new word is hidden in a sentence. Read it aloud and say what you think the bold word means from the rest of the sentence — then reveal it and see how close you were.
Read each part. After it, there's a quick comprehension check (try the questions from memory first), then one thing to discuss.
High in the wildest peaks of the Andes, cut off from the rest of the world, lay a valley that people had almost forgotten. Long ago, settlers had found their way in and built a happy little community there. But then a great landslide sealed the only pass, and a strange sickness came, and one by one the people lost their sight. Children were born blind, then their children, until after fifteen generations no one in the valley could see at all — and no one even remembered what "seeing" had ever meant. They had, quite simply, adapted. Their houses had no windows; their paths were smooth and known by touch; their hearing and sense of smell had grown so keen that they moved through their world with perfect ease.
Into this hidden place, by pure accident, fell a mountaineer named Nunez. He was climbing a great peak nearby when he slipped on the ice and went tumbling down a vast snow-slope, half-buried, bruised, but alive. When at last he found his feet, he made his way down and discovered — to his astonishment — the isolated valley and its people. And as he looked at their strange, unseeing faces and their eyes that never met his, one old saying rose in his mind, bright and confident: "In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is king." Here he was, a man who could see, among people who could not. Surely, he thought, he would soon be their master.
1. Why was everyone in the valley blind, and how had the community changed because of it?
2. How did Nunez arrive there, and what did he expect his position among the people to be?
1. A landslide sealed the valley and a sickness took the people's sight; over fifteen generations everyone was born blind, so they adapted — no windows, smooth paths, and very keen hearing and smell.
2. He was a mountaineer who slipped, tumbled down a snow-slope, and found the valley by accident. Remembering the saying about the one-eyed man being king, he expected to rule them because he could see.
It did not go as Nunez had planned. When he spoke of the mountains he had seen, of the sky, of light and colour and distant things, the villagers only frowned. To them these were meaningless words — the babble of a man newly made, whose mind was not yet formed. They had a whole explanation for him: he was a wild creature who had come over the rocks, and his talk of "seeing" was simply nonsense, the sign of a poor, deluded brain. In their world, built entirely without sight, the very idea was madness. The more Nunez insisted, the more certain they became that something was wrong with him.
His "gift" turned out to be no help at all. In the pitch dark of their windowless houses he was clumsy and lost, while they moved with total confidence. They knew every path by heart; they could hear him coming from far off; they worked by touch faster than he could by sight. When he boasted of his eyes, they set him simple tasks and watched him fail. Bit by bit, Nunez was forced to see the truth: far from being a king, he was the slowest, the most helpless, the most ignorant person in the valley — an outsider whose one advantage counted for nothing. And slowly he began to resent it, and then to accept it, and to learn their ways as a child learns, hoping only to be allowed to stay.
1. How did the villagers explain Nunez and his talk of "seeing"?
2. Why did his sight fail to give him any power over the blind villagers?
1. They decided he was a newly made, wild creature with an unformed, deluded mind; his talk of light and seeing was nonsense to them, and they thought he was ill or mad.
2. Their world had no light and was perfectly built for the blind; they moved with confidence in the dark while he was clumsy and lost, so his sight made him the most helpless person there, not the strongest.
In time, Nunez fell in love with a young woman of the valley named Medina-saroté, and she with him. But her family and the elders were troubled. To them he was a strange, defective man, full of odd notions about "seeing," and they could not give her to someone so plainly disordered. At last the wise men of the community found what they believed was the answer. They had studied him and decided that the cause of all his trouble — his restlessness, his strange talk, his failure to settle — lay in the two odd, moving things in his face. If those were simply removed, they said, he would be cured, calmed, made whole, and then he could marry and live among them as a normal man.
They asked him, gently and reasonably, to give up his eyes. And for a while, out of love, Nunez almost agreed. But on the morning fixed for it, he walked out alone and looked — really looked — at the world: the sunrise gold on the rock, the deep blue of the sky, the great white peaks far above the valley walls. He understood then that he could not trade all of that away, not even for her. So instead he began to climb. He climbed up and out of the valley, toward the light and the mountains and the wide world beyond, leaving behind the only place that had ever offered to keep him — if only he would agree to stop seeing.
1. What did the elders decide was the "cause" of Nunez's trouble, and what did they propose to do about it?
2. What choice did Nunez make in the end, and why?
1. They decided his eyes were the source of his strangeness and offered to remove them, believing this would cure and calm him so he could marry and live normally among them.
2. He almost agreed out of love, but looking at the sunrise, sky and mountains he could not give up sight. He chose to climb out of the valley toward the wider world instead.
The whole story turns on one question: who can do what? Nunez can see; the villagers cannot. They can move in the dark; he can't. English has a small family of forms for ability and possibility — get them right and you can talk about what people are, and aren't, able to do.
Read the meaning in brackets and complete each sentence.
1. In the valley today, the people are so used to the dark that they move around with total confidence. (present ability — yes)
2. When Nunez arrived, he understand why his talk of "seeing" upset them. (past ability — no)
3. For fifteen generations, no one in the valley see. (past ability — no)
4. Their hearing is so keen that they tell who is coming just by the sound. (present ability — yes)
1. can (present ability)
2. couldn't / could not (past ability, negative)
3. could (past ability, negative — "no one could see")
4. can (present ability)
Decide whether the sentence is about a general ability or one specific success, and complete it. More than one correct answer is possible for some.
1. He was a strong mountaineer, so in general he climb very difficult peaks. (general past ability)
2. After the long fall and a hard search, he finally find the way down into the valley. (one specific success)
3. Try as he might, Nunez make a single villager believe in light. (one specific failure)
1. could (general ability over time)
2. managed to / was able to (one specific success — NOT "could")
3. couldn't / could not (a single failure — "couldn't" is fine here)
Fill each gap with a suitable ability form: can, can't, could, couldn't, was able to or managed to. Read it aloud when you're done.
The villagers see, and they never — yet they lived with perfect ease. Nunez expected to rule them, but he soon found he even walk across a dark room without falling. After weeks of effort he learn a few of their ways, but he never make them believe that light was real.
can't (or couldn't) · could · couldn't · managed to / was able to · could / was able to
Notice: for the one hard-won success ("learn a few of their ways") we prefer managed to / was able to; for the general failure over time, couldn't works well.
Hold on to these — you'll need them in the Speak tab, where you'll be describing what people can and can't do, and what they managed against the odds.
You've read the story and you have the words — now let's think about what it means. Wells wrote this in 1904, but its questions have not aged a day.
Everyone expects the proverb to come true: "In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is king." Wells takes that comfortable idea and turns it inside out. In his valley, sight is not power — it is difference, and difference is treated as a defect. The story asks a question we still argue about today: what counts as "normal" is often just whatever the majority happens to be. The person who is different isn't wrong; they are simply outnumbered.
And notice how the villagers are drawn. They are not helpless or pitiable. They are skilful, capable and completely at home in a world built for them — it is Nunez who is clumsy and lost. Wells is careful: the "advantage" belongs to whoever fits the world they live in.
This is the heart of the lesson — do all of it out loud. The timer is there to keep you going: fill the time with detail rather than escaping it.
Tell the story of The Country of the Blind in your own words, as if to someone who has never heard it. Move through the arc: the isolated valley where everyone had gone blind → Nunez falling in and expecting to be king → his "gift" being useless, and the villagers thinking him deluded → the offer to remove his eyes so he could marry → his choice to climb out rather than give up sight.
Use the grammar as you go: can / can't, could / couldn't, and managed to / was able to for the moments of success and failure. Work in at least five key words (valley, isolated, tumbling, saying, nonsense, deluded, outsider, keen, adapted, resent).
In the valley, the majority decides that sight is a defect. Build an argument about this idea: is "normal" simply whatever most people are? Should a group ever pressure a person to change something about themselves just because they are different? Use examples you know — from school, work, culture or history — and decide where you stand.
Talk about a time when someone had to choose between fitting in and staying true to themselves. Lean on the grammar: what they could and couldn't do, and what they managed to do in the end.
Prefer not to talk about yourself? Pick one of these instead: