Malaria was defeating modern medicine — until a Chinese scientist found the answer in a 1,600-year-old text, and tested it on herself first.
Ten items. Work through the four activities — say your answer out loud before you reveal it.
Three words: an ingredient · a parasite · resistant. Say the right one, then reveal.
Read each part. After it, there's a quick check (answer from memory first), then one question to discuss.
In the late 1960s, malaria staged a comeback that frightened generals as much as doctors. The parasite had evolved resistance to chloroquine, the drug that had controlled it for a generation, and in the jungles of Vietnam the disease was disabling more soldiers than combat — on both sides. North Vietnam asked China for help, and on 23 May 1967 Beijing quietly launched a secret military-scale programme, named for its date: Project 523. Hundreds of scientists across dozens of institutes were set one task — find a new antimalarial — during the very years when the Cultural Revolution was closing universities and sending scientists to the countryside. Research continued under the project's protection, unpublished and anonymous by design.
One branch of the project took a road Western pharmacology would not have taken: back through China's own medical past. In 1969, Tu Youyou — a 39-year-old researcher at the Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Beijing, trained in both modern pharmacology and classical medical texts — was appointed to lead the search of the tradition. Her team combed ancient recipes, provincial folk knowledge and dynastic pharmacopoeias, and assembled a list of more than two thousand candidate remedies, which they narrowed and began, one by one, to screen against the malaria parasite in mice.
The personal price was of its era. Her husband had been sent away to a labour camp; sending herself fully into the project meant placing her two young daughters in care — one with her parents, one in a nursery — and she has spoken of her younger daughter failing to recognise her when they were finally reunited years later. She would say afterwards, simply, that the work needed doing and it was hers to do.
1. Why was Project 523 created, and what was unusual about its circumstances?
2. What was Tu Youyou's specific assignment, and what did it cost her family?
1. Chloroquine-resistant malaria was devastating soldiers in Vietnam; China launched a secret programme in 1967 to find a new drug — running through the Cultural Revolution, when open science had largely stopped, so the work was protected, anonymous and unpublished.
2. To lead the systematic search of traditional Chinese medical texts and folk remedies — 2,000+ candidates screened. Her husband was in a labour camp; she placed her daughters in care for years, and the younger one did not recognise her on reunion.
One candidate kept flickering: qinghao, sweet wormwood — a roadside herb that Chinese texts had recommended against fevers for well over a thousand years. Extracts of it sometimes suppressed the parasite dramatically, and sometimes did nothing at all. The inconsistency was maddening, and by the standards of drug screening it should have disqualified the plant. Tu went back — not to the laboratory, but to the library.
She found the answer in a slim volume by Ge Hong, a physician and alchemist of the fourth century: A Handbook of Prescriptions for Emergencies, written around 340 CE. For fevers, it advised: take a handful of qinghao, soak it in cold water, wring it out, drink the juice. Cold water. Every standard laboratory extraction used heat — and heat, Tu realised, might be destroying the very substance they were hunting. Her team rebuilt the process at low temperature, using ether as the solvent, and in October 1971, extract number 191 achieved what nothing else in the project had: one hundred per cent suppression of the malaria parasite in infected mice, and then in monkeys. A 1,600-year-old preparation note had corrected the twentieth century's laboratory technique.
Then came the step that places her beside Marshall in this series. Animal safety data was thin, the era's clinics were chaotic, and the malaria season in the south would not wait a year. Before any patient would be asked to swallow the extract, Tu and two colleagues volunteered to take it themselves, under observation in hospital, in escalating doses. She was the project's head, she argued; the risk was properly hers. There was no harm. Trials on malaria patients in Hainan followed within months: fevers that used to burn for days collapsed in hours, and parasites vanished from the blood. The active compound was isolated and named qinghaosu — artemisinin — and, in the project's anonymous fashion, announced to the world in a 1977 paper with no authors' names at all.
1. What was the problem with qinghao, and how did the old book solve it?
2. What did Tu do before patient trials, and why?
1. Its extracts worked inconsistently. Ge Hong's 4th-century handbook prescribed soaking the herb in COLD water — revealing that heat in standard lab extraction was destroying the active compound. A low-temperature ether extraction (sample 191) then achieved 100% suppression in mice and monkeys.
2. She and two colleagues took the extract themselves in hospital, in rising doses — as project head she claimed the risk. Unharmed, they proceeded to patient trials in Hainan, where the extract cleared fevers and parasites; the compound was named artemisinin and published anonymously in 1977.
The drug conquered the world slowly, and mostly without her name. Through the 1980s and 1990s artemisinin and its derivatives proved themselves the fastest-acting antimalarials known; combined with partner drugs — the artemisinin combination therapies, ACTs — they became, from the 2000s, the World Health Organization's standard treatment worldwide. The global death toll from malaria fell by roughly half in the two decades that followed, a decline in which ACTs, alongside bed nets, carry a great share of the credit; the lives saved are counted in millions, most of them African children. Meanwhile the discoverer worked on in Beijing, obscure even at home — famously a "three noes" professor: no doctorate, no study abroad, no membership of the national academies, which never elected her.
Recognition arrived through detective work. In the 2000s, researchers tracing the anonymous Project 523 record — interviewing veterans, reading the unpublished archives — established what the namelessness had hidden: the cold-extraction insight, sample 191 and the first self-test led back to Tu Youyou's group. The Lasker Prize, American medicine's most prestigious award, followed in 2011, and in 2015, at the age of eighty-four, she received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine — the first Chinese scientist honoured for work done in China, and the first female Chinese laureate. In Stockholm she gave her lecture seated, and framed the discovery her own way: as "a gift from traditional Chinese medicine to the world" — while insisting, in the same breath, that the gift had required modern science to unwrap it. Neither tradition alone nor the laboratory alone had cured anything; the cure lived in the collision.
The story remains open at both ends. At one end, the parasite is doing what parasites do: artemisinin-resistant strains have emerged in Southeast Asia and are being watched anxiously in Africa — the chloroquine story beginning again, with the world's stockpile of miracles one drug lighter. At the other end sits the question her career poses to every research system: the cure for humanity's oldest killer was found by an unfashionable researcher, in an unfashionable institute, reading unfashionable books, under a programme no committee would approve today. How many Ge Hong sentences — in Ayurvedic texts, in monastery recipe books, in grandmother's instructions nobody wrote down — are still waiting for someone trained to read both ways?
1. What did the drug achieve globally, and what was its discoverer's status meanwhile?
2. How was she finally identified, and how did she frame the discovery in Stockholm?
1. As ACTs, artemisinin became the global standard treatment; malaria deaths roughly halved over two decades, with millions of lives saved. Tu remained obscure — the "three noes" professor: no doctorate, no foreign training, no academy membership.
2. Researchers tracing the anonymous Project 523 archives established her group's role, leading to the 2011 Lasker Prize and the 2015 Nobel at 84. She called artemisinin "a gift from traditional Chinese medicine to the world" — a gift, she stressed, that modern science had to unwrap: the cure lived in the collision of the two.
This story is framed by a vanished world: what malaria used to do, what healers would prepare, what science used to ignore. English has two beautiful tools for the past that is no longer true — with one trap between them.
Complete each sentence; where both work, say so — where only used to works, know why.
1. Before ACTs, a malaria fever (burn) for days, and many children (not / survive) it.
2. The institute (be) small and unfashionable — a state, so choose carefully.
3. During the project, Tu (work) through the night and (test) each new extract at dawn.
1. used to burn / would burn · didn't use to survive (or: wouldn't survive)
2. used to be (state — "would be" impossible)
3. would work / used to work · would test (repeated actions — both fine, "would" more literary)
Three learner sentences. Correct the wrong ones; write "correct" for the good one.
1. "The parasite would be resistant to chloroquine by 1960." →
2. "Healers would soak the herb in cold water and wring it out." →
3. "She didn't used to have a doctorate." →
1. The parasite was / had become resistant… ("would be" can't mark a state)
2. Correct — repeated actions, storytelling would.
3. She didn't use to have a doctorate. (no d after did — though many write it, exams don't forgive it)
Fill each gap with used to, didn't use to or would + the verb, choosing the only correct option where states appear. Then read it aloud.
Malaria (kill) more than a million people every year, most of them children. Whole regions (be) impossible to farm because of the fevers. Every summer, families in the south (move) their beds away from the water, and village healers (prepare) qinghao against the fever — knowledge that Western medicine (not / take) seriously. Laboratories (boil) their plant extracts as a matter of routine, which is exactly why the cure (slip) through their hands, year after year, until one reader went back to a book from 340 CE.
used to kill · used to be · would move / used to move · would prepare / used to prepare · didn't use to take · would boil / used to boil · would slip / kept slipping
Two forced "used to" (the states); everywhere else, "would" adds the storyteller's rhythm. Read it once more using only past simple — feel how the vanished-world colour drains away.
Take the pair into the Speak tab — Task C asks for a vanished world of your own.
A note on the record: Project 523's archives were secret and its publications anonymous, so parts of the credit were reconstructed decades later and remain debated — team members' contributions included. The self-test, sample 191 and the cold-extraction insight are documented in the project record and her Nobel lecture.
All of it out loud, against the clock. Open your descriptions of the past with used to, then let would carry the habits — and keep states away from would.
Tell it across its 1,600 years: the world malaria used to rule → resistance and the jungles of Vietnam → the secret project in a closed era → the daughters and the price → 2,000 remedies → the flickering herb → Ge Hong's cold-water sentence → sample 191 → the self-test → Hainan → forty anonymous years → the three noes → Stockholm at 84 → and resistance rising again.
Use used to and would at least twice each, and five key words (malaria, remedy, extract, parasite, resistant, ingredient, volunteer, unrecognised, traditional, screen).
Two rounds. Round one: it is 1971 — defend the self-test to an ethics board: the season won't wait, the animal data is thin, the risk is yours as project head. Round two: chair the board rejecting it — then state what alternative you would order, and what it would cost in time and lives. Close with your honest ruling.
Describe a world that no longer exists — with used to setting the scene and would painting its habits.
Choose one: