BEHIND THE SCREEN · B2/C1 · 50 min

Escape from Alcatraz

Three men left the most escape-proof prison in America on a June night in 1962 with a raft made of raincoats — and the case has never been closed.

Today: you'll tell the story of Escape from Alcatraz — a quiet man, a soft patch of concrete and six months of digging with a spoon — discover how much of it genuinely happened and whether the men lived, and master the English of past ability and achievement: could, was/were able to, managed to and succeeded in + -ing.
Before we begin — talk it through: What would make a place genuinely impossible to escape from — the walls, the water, or the people watching? Have you ever worked patiently for months on something nobody around you knew about? And when someone outwits a powerful system, why do so many of us quietly enjoy it?

The words for today's story

Work through the four short activities. Each word sits in a situation that gives its meaning away — you don't need to know the film yet. Say your answer out loud first, then reveal.

A. Infer from context — what does the bold word mean?

1. With no money, no machines and no engineer within a hundred miles, the villagers built a bridge that carried lorries, out of rope, planks and worn-out tyres. Visitors still come to stare at their ingenuity.
ingenuity (n) — cleverness at solving problems, especially with very little to work with.
2. Her records were meticulous: every payment, every date, every signature entered twice and checked against the original before the file was closed.
meticulous (adj) — extremely careful about small details; done with exact, patient precision.
3. Hunters float a painted wooden bird on the lake as a decoy; the flock overhead sees it, believes the water is safe, and comes down within range.
a decoy (n) — a person or thing put in place to attract attention or mislead someone, so that something else can happen unnoticed.
4. For eighty years the salt water eroded the cliff, taking a few centimetres of soft rock at a time, until the coastal path finally dropped into the sea.
to erode (v) — to wear something away gradually. Used of rock and soil, and also of things like trust, power or authority.

B. Closest in meaning — which one is nearest?

5. futile is closest in meaning to: (a) pointless   (b) urgent   (c) secret
(a) pointless — futile (adj) means certain to fail, and therefore not worth doing.
6. audacious is closest in meaning to: (a) careful   (b) boldly daring   (c) dishonest
audacious (adj) — extremely bold; willing to take a risk that shocks other people. The noun is audacity.

C. Which meaning fits? (choose a, b or c)

7. For eleven years the thief eluded the police, slipping out of a back door minutes before every raid.
To elude someone is: (a) to work secretly for them; (b) to escape or avoid being caught by them; (c) to report them to a court.
(b) — to elude (v) — to escape from or avoid someone, especially cleverly. Also used of ideas: the answer eluded me.
8. The laboratory results were not conclusive, so the family were left holding exactly the question they had started with.
Conclusive evidence is: (a) evidence gathered at the end of a trial; (b) evidence that settles a question beyond any doubt; (c) evidence nobody is allowed to see.
(b) — conclusive (adj) — proving something so completely that the matter is settled. The opposite is inconclusive.

D. Which word completes the sentence naturally?

9. The orchestra's sheet music was lost on the way to the hall, so the players had to ______ the whole second half from memory.
(a) improvise   (b) rehearse   (c) postpone
(a) improvise — to improvise (v) — to make or perform something with no preparation, using whatever happens to be available. You can improvise music, a speech, or a tool.
10. Nobody ever found out what happened to the ship, so eighty years later the newspapers still fill their pages with ______ rather than facts.
(a) instruction   (b) speculation   (c) permission
(b) speculation — speculation (n) — guessing and theorising about something without evidence. The verb is to speculate.

Now use them — out loud

Talk it through before we watch:
  • Using ingenuity, meticulous and audacious, predict: what kind of plan do you think this film is about, and how long did it take?
  • Which of these ten words would you expect in a police report, and which in a newspaper story? Sort them out loud and say why.

The film, in three parts

Don Siegel's Escape from Alcatraz (1979), with Clint Eastwood as Frank Morris. Read each part, try the quick check from memory, then discuss. (There are spoilers ahead — that's the point; we're here to talk about it.)

Part 1 — The Rock

January 1960. A prison launch crosses San Francisco Bay through the rain, and a quiet, watchful man named Frank Morris is delivered to Alcatraz. He is stripped, searched and marched down a corridor of staring cells to a bare concrete box. Later he is taken to the warden, a cold, precise man who trims his fingernails while he explains that the island takes the prisoners nobody else can hold, and that nobody has ever escaped from it and nobody ever will. Morris says almost nothing. He leaves the office with the warden's nail clippers in his hand.

Life settles into routine and threat. Morris makes friends: English, a Black inmate serving two life sentences who runs the library and keeps his own counsel; Litmus, a cheerful older man with a weak heart; and Doc, who paints portraits and grows chrysanthemums in the yard. He also makes an enemy — Wolf, who corners him in the showers and later comes at him in the yard with a blade. Both men go to solitary.

The warden's power is absolute and petty. When he sees that Doc's portrait of him is unflattering, he takes away the old man's paints. Doc, who has nothing else, goes to the workshop and cuts off his own fingers. As he is led away he presses a chrysanthemum into Morris's hand. Morris understands what the island is really for: not to hold men, but to erode them, quietly, until they stop.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What does the warden tell Morris on his first day — and what does Morris take from the office?

2. What happens to Doc, and what causes it?

1. That Alcatraz holds the men no other prison can, and that nobody has ever escaped or ever will. Morris quietly pockets the warden's nail clippers.

2. The warden takes away his painting privileges over an unflattering portrait, and Doc, left with nothing, cuts off his own fingers in the workshop.

Discuss:
  • The warden runs the island to wear men down, not simply to keep them locked up. Is breaking a prisoner's spirit ever a legitimate purpose of a prison?

Part 2 — A hole the size of a spoon

Alone in his cell, Morris notices something small. The concrete around the ventilation grille at the back of the cell is soft; decades of salt air have been eating the building from the inside. He scrapes it with a spoon, and it gives.

Then chance hands him the rest of a plan. Two brothers, John and Clarence Anglin — bank robbers he knew years earlier — arrive on the island, and their cells are on the same tier. Charley Butts, next door, becomes the fourth man. Night after night, under the cover of Morris's accordion, they dig with sharpened spoons, the stolen nail clippers and a drill improvised from the motor of a broken vacuum cleaner. Painted cardboard grilles hide the holes at inspection time. The work is slow, secret and meticulous.

Above the cells lies a forgotten space at the top of the block, and there they build the rest of it: dummy heads moulded from soap and paper and finished with real human hair from the barbershop, so that the beds will look occupied; life vests and a raft stitched together out of dozens of stolen raincoats. Meanwhile the warden keeps tightening his grip. He crushes the chrysanthemum that Morris has set on a dining table in Doc's honour, and Litmus, protesting, collapses and dies. It is clear that nobody is coming to help these men.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What does Morris discover about the back wall of his cell, and who joins the plan?

2. What are the dummy heads for, and what is the raft made from?

1. The concrete around the ventilation grille has been softened by salt air and can be dug out. The Anglin brothers, whom he knew before, and his neighbour Charley Butts join him.

2. The heads are decoys, left on the pillows so the beds look occupied at night. The raft and the life vests are made from stolen raincoats.

Discuss:
  • The plan needs months of patience and almost no equipment. In a situation like this, which is worth more — cleverness or patience? Which do you have more of?

Part 3 — 11 June

On the night of 11 June 1962 the four men wait for lights out. Morris pushes out his grille, then the Anglins push out theirs; the dummy heads go onto the pillows, and the three slip into the utility corridor behind the cells. Butts cannot get out. He panics, works at his own wall far too late, and by the time he is through, the others are gone. He climbs back onto his bunk and lies there in the dark, listening.

The three climb the pipework to the roof, cross it between the sweeps of the searchlights, slide down a vent pipe to the ground, and go over the perimeter fences to the water on the north-east shore. They inflate the raft and push out into the bay. The camera simply lets them go into the darkness. That is the last we see of them.

In the morning a guard taps a sleeping head and it rolls onto the floor. The alarm goes. The warden, hunting for proof that his island beat them, lands on nearby Angel Island and finds shreds of raincoat and a few personal effects — planted, one of his officers suggests, so that the world will believe the men drowned. Then he sees something else in the grass: a chrysanthemum, of a kind that does not grow there. He crushes it and throws it into the water. A closing card tells us that the men were never found, and that Alcatraz closed less than a year later.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What happens to Charley Butts on the night of the escape?

2. What does the warden find on Angel Island, and why does it disturb him?

1. He cannot get through his wall in time. By the time he does, the other three have gone, and he returns to his bunk.

2. Raincoat shreds and personal effects — possibly left deliberately — and a chrysanthemum that could not have grown on the island, hinting that the men reached it alive.

Discuss:
  • The film never shows us whether they survived. Is refusing to answer braver than answering — or is it simply a way of avoiding the harder ending?

Grammar — past ability (could, was able to, managed to)

This film is one long question about ability: what these men could do in general, and what they managed to do on one particular night. English draws a line between those two things that learners often miss — and it is exactly the line this story is built on.

1. General ability in the past — use could:
For a skill or ability someone had over a period of time, could is the natural choice.
• "Morris could pick almost any lock." (a skill he had for years)
• "The brothers could swim well." (a general ability)
• Was/were able to also works here, but sounds slightly more formal: "He was able to repair almost any machine."
2. One specific occasion, and it worked — do NOT use could:
When you are talking about a single event in the past that actually succeeded, could is wrong. Use was/were able to, managed to or succeeded in + -ing.
• Not: "That night he could reach the shore."    Yes: "That night he was able to reach the shore."
• Yes: "They managed to climb the fence without being seen." (managed to adds a sense of difficulty)
• Yes: "They succeeded in inflating the raft." (more formal — note the -ing)
3. Two things that let could back in:
• Negatives. Couldn't is fine for general ability and for a single occasion: "He couldn't swim at all." / "That night he couldn't shift the grille." Both are perfect English.
• Verbs of the senses and the mind — see, hear, feel, smell, understand, remember. Here could is normal even for one moment: "He could hear the guards on the tier above."

1. General ability, or a single occasion?

Read the meaning in brackets and write the missing words.

1. Long before he came to the island, Morris (open) almost any lock he was handed. (a skill he had for years)

2. After six months of scraping, the men finally (get) through the wall. (one occasion — and it worked)

3. Try as he might, the fourth man (not / shift) his grille that night. (one occasion — and it failed)

1. could open (general ability over time)

2. were able to get / managed to get (a single successful occasion — "could get" would be wrong here)

3. couldn't shift (negatives are fine on a single occasion)

2. managed to or succeeded in?

Build the phrase with the word in brackets. Watch the form that follows each one.

1. Nobody thought it was possible, but they (manage / build) a boat out of coats.

2. After two failed attempts, she finally (succeed / open) the locked door.

3. In complete darkness they (manage / cross) the roof unseen.

1. managed to build (managed to + infinitive)

2. succeeded in opening (succeeded in + -ing)

3. managed to cross

3. Complete the account — mix all the forms

Fill each gap with the form the meaning needs. Read the whole thing aloud when you're done.

Morris (fix) almost any machine — a skill he had had since he was a boy. On the night itself the three men (squeeze) through the widened vents, and after a long climb they (reach) the roof unseen. Lying awake below, the fourth man (hear) their footsteps overhead, but he (not / follow) them.

could fix · were able to squeeze / managed to squeeze · managed to reach / were able to reach · could hear · couldn't follow

Notice the pattern: a lasting skill takes could; a single success takes was/were able to or managed to; could hear is fine because hear is a verb of the senses; and couldn't works anywhere.

Carry the distinction into the Speak tab. The whole story lives in the gap between what these men could do and what, on one particular night, they managed to do.

The Real Story — the night of 11 June 1962

Almost all of the escape in the film actually happened. The men were real, the tools were real, the date is exact. What the film leaves hanging — did they live? — is genuinely still hanging, in a case file that has never been closed.

🔦 Three men out, and one who didn't get out

Frank Morris and the brothers John and Clarence Anglin left their cells on the night of 11 June 1962. A fourth man, Allen West, was part of the plan and did not get out: the cement he had used to patch the crumbling concrete around his own vent had set hard, and the grille would not move. The dummy heads held the illusion until about seven the following morning, when an officer touched one and it rolled onto the floor. The Anglins were serving 35 years for robbing a bank in Columbia, Alabama, in January 1958; Morris was an armed robber and a repeat escaper whose recorded IQ of 133 placed him in the top two per cent of the population. These were convicted criminals, not folk heroes — which is precisely what makes the sympathy the film asks of us worth arguing about.

What they actually built

The mechanics in the film are close to the record. Over roughly six months the men widened the ventilation openings beneath their washbasins using discarded saw blades found on the prison grounds, metal spoons from the mess hall and a drill improvised from the motor of a broken vacuum cleaner. They hid the damage behind painted cardboard and masked the noise with Morris's accordion. On the unused top tier above the cells they set up a workshop.

The dummy heads were real, and were made from a paste of soap, toothpaste, concrete dust and toilet paper, painted and finished with human hair collected from the prison barbershop. So were the vests and the raft: more than fifty raincoats, sewn by hand, sealed with liquid plastic and heat from the steam pipes, and worked up from designs in Popular Mechanics, with paddles cut from plywood. They inflated the raft with a concertina taken from another prisoner and converted into a bellows. Then they climbed a ventilation shaft to the roof, went down some fifteen metres of kitchen vent pipe, crossed two barbed-wire fences and reached the north-east shore — a blind spot in the searchlights, near the power plant. It was an audacious plan built out of nothing but patience and ingenuity.

What was found — and what the FBI concluded

Three days later a Coast Guard cutter picked up a paddle floating roughly 180 metres off the southern shore of Angel Island, and workers on another boat recovered a wallet wrapped in plastic containing names, addresses and photographs of the Anglins' family and friends. On 21 June a home-made life vest washed up on Cronkite Beach, outside the Golden Gate. No raft was ever recovered. No bodies were ever recovered either.

The FBI worked the case for seventeen years and closed its file on 31 December 1979 — the same year the film was released. Its conclusion was that the three most probably drowned in the cold water of the bay: the debris suggested the raft had broken up, and investigators found no later crimes, no contact with families and no credible evidence of survival. The evidence was handed to the US Marshals Service, and that investigation has never been closed; in 2022 the Marshals released age-progressed images of all three men, by then notionally in their nineties. For the wider record: across the island's 29 years as a federal prison, 36 men made 14 escape attempts. Twenty-three were recaptured, six were shot dead and two drowned. Five — these three among them — are still officially listed as missing and presumed drowned.

Could they have made it? The 2014 model

In 2014 a Dutch team — the coastal scientist Fedor Baart of the research institute Deltares and the hydrologist Rolf Hut of Delft University of Technology — ran the escape through a detailed computer model of the tides and currents of San Francisco Bay. Their answer was startlingly specific: the hour was everything. Launch much before 11.30 p.m. and the current would have dragged the raft straight out towards the open Pacific, where cold water would have finished it. Launch well after midnight and it would have been pushed into the East Bay, to be recaptured at dawn or killed by exposure. But in the narrow window between about 11.30 p.m. and midnight, a raft leaving that north-east shore and paddled north would have been carried out towards the Golden Gate and could have landed near Horseshoe Bay, on the shore just north of the bridge. The team also noted that a paddle abandoned at Horseshoe Bay would drift to roughly where the real paddle was found. Hut's own summary of the range of outcomes was blunt: in the worst case, almost no chance; with the right hour and the right direction, almost a certainty.

The model does not say they lived. It says the escape was survivable — which is a different and more uncomfortable claim, and it is not conclusive either way.

The letter, and the sixty years of silence

In 2018 it emerged that San Francisco police had received a letter in 2013 from a writer claiming to be John Anglin, saying the other two were dead and offering to surrender in exchange for treatment for cancer. The FBI examined it for fingerprints, DNA and handwriting; the results were inconclusive, neither confirming nor ruling out the writer. The US Marshals treated it as a hoax. In more than sixty years there has been no verified sighting of any of the three men and no identified remains — only speculation, which has never once become evidence.

Where the film leaves the record

Siegel shot the film on Alcatraz itself and stayed close to the mechanics — but he changed the people. The warden is entirely invented, a single cold antagonist created for the film, partly to avoid legal trouble; the real wardens of that period were Paul Madigan and Olin Blackwell. Doc's mutilation is borrowed from someone else: an inmate named Rufe Persful, who cut off his fingers with a hatchet in 1937, long before Morris arrived. And Charley Butts is a substantial rewrite of Allen West. In the film he is a nervous newcomer who loses his nerve; in life, West had been on the island since 1957, had a record of violence and repeated escape attempts, and always claimed the plan had been his idea. The film needs Morris to be the sole mastermind. The record is messier.

One last correction, because it is the thing people most often get wrong. Alcatraz did close on 21 March 1963, less than a year after the escape, exactly as the film's closing card says. But it did not close because three men got off it. It closed because it was ruinously expensive to run — around $10 a day per prisoner in 1959, against about $3 at the federal penitentiary in Atlanta — and because five decades of salt air and salt water had eroded the concrete so badly that millions of dollars of restoration were needed. Attorney General Robert Kennedy ordered it shut. The escape was a humiliation; the building bill was the reason.

Take these into the discussion:
  • Which parts did you assume the film had invented — and which turn out to be exactly what happened?
  • The film invents a warden, a flower and a fourth man's cowardice, but keeps every detail of the tools. Is that an honest bargain with the audience, or a quiet lie? Does it matter?
  • The FBI says they drowned; a tidal model says they could have walked ashore. What would it take to convince you either way — and why do you think most people want one answer more than the other?
Go deeper: we've stayed on a single night in 1962, but the island had a long life before those three men and a longer one after — the whole true story, as a lesson of its own: Short History: Alcatraz →

Speak

This is the heart of the lesson — do it all out loud. The timer keeps you going; fill the time with detail.

Useful language: reach for today's forms — could for lasting skills ("he could pick locks"), was/were able to and managed to for the single night that worked ("they managed to cross the roof"), succeeded in + -ing when you want it formal, and couldn't anywhere. For opinions: "What's striking is…", "You could argue that…", "On one level… but on another…".
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Tell the story (4 minutes)

Tell the story of Escape from Alcatraz in your own words, as if to someone who has never seen it. Move through the arc: the arrival on the island and the warden's promise → the friendships, and what happens to Doc → the soft concrete and the spoon → the brothers, the workshop and the dummy heads → the night of 11 June and the man left behind → the morning, and the flower on Angel Island.

Work in at least five key words (ingenuity, meticulous, decoy, erode, futile, audacious, elude, conclusive, improvise, speculation), and use past ability deliberately: "Morris could pick locks, but on that night they managed to get through the wall."

Task B · Should we be cheering? (4 minutes)

The film asks you to root for three convicted armed robbers against the officers whose job is to hold them — and most audiences do it happily. Build the argument both ways. Is our sympathy simply admiration for skill and courage, regardless of who has it? Or does a story like this quietly ask us to forget the bank staff, the sentences and the victims? Then decide where you actually stand.

Task C · What is a prison for? (4 minutes)

The warden in the film believes the island exists to break men. Others would say a prison exists to protect the public, or to change the person inside it. Make your case, with examples.

Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it:

  • Whether the main purpose of prison should be punishment, public safety, or rehabilitation.
  • A famous escape, disappearance or unsolved case from your own country.
  • Whether an unsolved case should stay open for ever, or be formally closed after a set number of years.
  • Whether extreme security actually deters people, or simply makes them more determined and more inventive.
  • A film or book that made you sympathise with someone you probably shouldn't have.
  • A piece of everyday ingenuity you've seen — somebody solving a real problem with almost nothing.

To finish — the bigger questions

  1. The FBI concluded the men drowned; a hydrodynamic model says they could have reached a beach. Which conclusion do you find yourself believing, and is that belief based on the evidence or on the story you'd prefer?
  2. The film ends with a flower that could not have grown where it is found — a hint at an answer the evidence does not support. Should a film based on real events be allowed that?
  3. Sixty years on, the Marshals' file is still open on three men who would now be over a hundred. Is that justice, persistence, or paperwork?
  4. Before you go — from memory: give one sentence with could (a lasting ability you had in the past), one with was able to or managed to (a single difficult thing you achieved), and one with couldn't — and explain why could would be wrong in the second one.