← Deep Space mapLesson 4 of 6
Lesson 4 · Planets beyond the Sun

Other Worlds

In 1991 we knew of no planets around other stars. Now we know of more than 6,000. Find out how you detect a world you can never see, and what the numbers say about life.

Planets known outside our solar system
0 → 6,000+
In 1991 the number was zero. The first confirmed planet around another star came in 1992, around a pulsar, and the first around a Sun-like star in 1995. Today more than 6,000 are confirmed, and the real number in our galaxy is probably in the hundreds of billions.

Almost none of these planets have ever been seen. They are far too faint, lost in the glare of their stars. We find them by what they do to the light, and the results have kept breaking the rules of what astronomers expected a planetary system to look like.

Seen from far away, the Earth crosses in front of the Sun once a year. By what fraction does it dim the Sun's light while it passes?
About 0.0084%, or 84 parts per million. The dip is proportional to the area of the planet divided by the area of the star: (Rplanet/Rstar)². Earth's radius is 1/109 of the Sun's, so the dip is (1/109)². Jupiter would dim the Sun by about 1%. Detecting 0.0084% from space is why the Kepler telescope was built so carefully.
If a planet can't be seen directly, what other way is there to find it?
Its gravity. A planet and its star orbit a common centre of mass (the balance point between them), so the star wobbles. The wobble shows up as a tiny repeating Doppler shift in the star's light (the same effect that makes a siren change pitch as it passes: light from a star moving towards us shifts slightly blue, away from us slightly red). Jupiter makes the Sun move at 12.5 m/s, a brisk cycling speed, and Earth would make the Sun move at 9 cm/s, slower than a crawling baby. The best spectrographs now measure down to about 10 cm/s.
Part 1

Five ways to find a planet

MethodWhat you measureWhat it gives you
TransitThe dip in starlight as a planet crosses the star (Kepler, TESS, JWST)Radius, orbit period. Most planets have been found this way.
Radial velocityThe star's wobble, from Doppler shiftsMinimum mass, orbit period
Direct imagingBlock the star's light and photograph the planetRare: only works for young, large planets far from their stars
MicrolensingA star and planet in the foreground bend and brighten the light of a background starMass; can find planets with no star at all
AstrometryThe star's tiny sideways wobble on the sky (Gaia)Mass and orbit, for massive planets

Combine transit and wobble and you get both radius and mass, and so the planet's density. That tells you whether it is rock, water or gas.

Part 2

The first surprise

In 1995, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz found a planet around the Sun-like star 51 Pegasi. It had about half Jupiter's mass, but orbited in just 4.2 days, much closer than Mercury is to the Sun. Theories at the time said gas giants could only form far from their star, where ice is stable. A hot Jupiter should not exist. Then they turned out to be common among the planets that are easiest to find. The explanation is migration: planets can form far out and then drift inwards. The pair won the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physics.

The second surprise came from Kepler (launched 2009). The most common planets are between Earth and Neptune in size, super-Earths and mini-Neptunes. Our solar system has none. Our own arrangement, it turns out, is not typical.

Part 3

The Goldilocks zone

The habitable zone is the range of distances from a star where a planet's surface could hold liquid water. For the Sun it runs from roughly 0.95 to 1.7 AU (one AU is the Earth–Sun distance, about 150 million km), depending on assumptions. Dimmer stars have zones closer in. Remember, a planet in the zone is only possibly habitable. It also needs an atmosphere, and the right amount of it.

The famous test case is TRAPPIST-1, a tiny red star 40 light-years away with seven Earth-sized planets. All seven orbit closer to their star than Mercury does to the Sun, with years of 1.5 to 19 days. Three of them (e, f and g) are in the habitable zone. They look like a promising place for water until you ask the next question, as JWST did in 2023: planets b and c show no sign of a thick atmosphere. They look like bare rock. Red dwarf stars also throw violent flares, and a planet so close is probably locked with one side always facing the star.

Why red dwarfs matter. About 3 in 4 stars in the Milky Way are red dwarfs, and they live for trillions of years (lesson 1). If any can host life, the galaxy is a much more promising place. If their flares always strip atmospheres, it is much less. This is why the TRAPPIST-1 results are so closely watched.
Part 4

Reading an atmosphere

When a planet transits, a sliver of starlight passes through its atmosphere on the way to us. Each gas absorbs particular colours. The pattern of missing colours is a chemical fingerprint. This is transmission spectroscopy, and JWST does it. A biosignature is a combination of gases that is hard to explain without life: for example oxygen and methane together, since they react and destroy each other unless something keeps making them.

An open case. K2-18 b, a planet 124 light-years away about 2.6 times Earth's radius, has had its atmosphere analysed by JWST. Methane and carbon dioxide were detected. Claims in 2023 and again in 2025 of a molecule linked on Earth to marine life (dimethyl sulfide) were challenged by other teams who could not reproduce them. As of the latest evidence, there is no confirmed detection of life anywhere beyond Earth. The method is sound. The signals are not yet strong enough.
Part 5

Are we alone? A way to organise the question

In 1961 the astronomer Frank Drake gathered a small meeting at the Green Bank radio observatory and wrote down seven terms:

N = R* × fp × ne × fl × fi × fc × L

N is the number of civilisations in the galaxy we could contact right now. The other terms: the rate of star formation (R*), the fraction of stars with planets (fp), the number of habitable planets per such star (ne), the fraction on which life starts (fl), becomes intelligent (fi) and builds technology we can detect (fc), and how long such a civilisation lasts (L).

The first three used to be pure guesses. Thanks to planet hunters, they are now measured. The last four remain unknown, because we have only one example of life, and the answer swings from less than one to millions depending on what you guess. The physicist Enrico Fermi's lunchtime question in 1950, “Where is everybody?”, sits behind it: if the galaxy is old and life is common, why have we seen no sign of anyone? Maybe one of the steps is far rarer than we think, which is sometimes called a Great Filter. The only honest answer is that we don't know.

Transit simulator

Build a star and a planet and watch the dip. The left panel shows the star and the planet passing. The right shows the brightness you would measure.

Dip in brightness
Orbit distance
Transit lasts
Chance a random system lines up

The Drake equation

Set the seven terms. The first three come with measurements. The last four are guesses, and the result shows how much the answer depends on them.

N, civilisations we could contact now

Check yourself

Five questions.

Say it out loud

A news story claims: “Earth-like planet found in the habitable zone!” Explain, using the words atmosphere, habitable zone and biosignature, why that headline does not mean there is life, and what you would want to measure next.

Rabbit holes

Rogue planetsPlanets with no star, adrift between the stars. Microlensing suggests there may be many. Could one have an ocean under ice, heated from inside?
Hycean worldsA proposed type of planet: a hot, hydrogen-rich atmosphere over a deep global ocean. It would be a very different place from Earth, and K2-18 b may be one.
TechnosignaturesRather than looking for biology, look for engineering: radio signals, laser pulses, or the heat of huge structures. The SETI search has been running since 1960 and has found nothing so far.
The Great FilterIf life is common but we see no one, something stops civilisations. Is it behind us (hard steps, like complex cells) or ahead of us? Why would finding simple life on Mars be bad news for this argument?
← PreviousThe Expanding Universe