Academic English for PhD Researchers

A 5-stream pathway in academic English skills, designed for researchers who already have a master's and are now operating at PhD level. Subject-agnostic โ€” works for any field.

Who this is for: postgraduate researchers whose first language isn't English, who can already read academic texts but need to operate at PhD level โ€” reading volume, writing precision, supervisor communication, and eventually a viva.

The Five Streams

Cycle through; pick what's most pressing
STREAM 1

Academic Reading

Strategy: three reading speeds, argument structure, signal words. Mechanics: eye fixations, chunking, the pointer technique. Reading 30 papers a week without drowning.

STREAM 2

Note-Taking

Cornell Method and Zettelkasten. Building a knowledge system across hundreds of papers โ€” so year three of a PhD is easier than year one, not harder.

STREAM 3

Academic Writing

The thesis-level moves: synthesising literatures, framing theoretically, defending methodological choices. Plus C1 foundations (hedging, paragraph architecture) for those who need them.

STREAM 4

Argumentation & Critical Thinking

Structuring claims, evidence, and counter-arguments. The language of emphasis and qualification.

STREAM 5

Academic Communication

Supervisor emails. Seminar language. Conference questions. Eventually the viva.

Cross-Cutting

Touches every stream

Using AI in PhD Research โ€” Practical Workflows & Integrity

Concrete techniques for using AI to read faster, paraphrase ethically, draft and refine, and stress-test arguments โ€” alongside the academic-integrity rules that protect your thesis. Not a debate about whether AI is good or bad. Just how to use it well.

Open the lesson โ†’

Three principles that run through the whole pathway

  1. Your own words. If you can't paraphrase a claim, you don't yet understand it. This applies to notes, to writing, to AI-assisted work.
  2. One idea, one note, one paragraph. Atomicity beats density. Findability beats completeness.
  3. Hedge appropriately. PhD-level writing rarely makes flat assertions. The language of likely, suggests, tends to, in most cases, on the whole is what separates research writing from undergraduate writing.