PIRANESI · BOOK CLUB · MEETING 2 OF 4 · C1 · 50 min

The Journals

The narrator writes everything down and keeps an index so that nothing is lost. But what happens when your own notes tell a story that you do not remember?

An etching of a stone alcove with a table, a stack of numbered notebooks, a candle and an open journal, with a flooded hall beyond the window

← The House  ·  The whole series  ·  The Other →

Today: you'll talk about memory, records and doubt, use a four-box grid to sort what is written down from what is remembered, and practise the language of certainty and uncertainty about the past.
Before we start — talk these through:
  • Do you keep a diary, a journal or notes of any kind? What would happen if you lost them?
  • Think of a memory you are sure about. How do you know it really happened that way?
  • Have you ever read something you wrote years ago and felt it was written by a stranger?

The vocabulary of this story

Ten items. Say your answer out loud before you reveal it.

A · What do they mean here? Work it out from the context

Read the sentence, guess the meaning of the word in bold, then reveal.

The library kept a complete archive of every newspaper printed in the city since 1850.
archive (noun) — a collection of documents and records kept for their historical value. As a verb: to store something in an archive.
She made a short entry in her diary each evening, never more than three lines.
entry (noun) — a single piece of writing in a diary, journal or record. Compare: an entry in a dictionary.
The memory began to fade until only a smell and a colour remained.
fade (verb) — to become gradually weaker, paler or less clear.
His account was inconsistent: on Monday he said he had been at home, and on Tuesday he said he had been at work.
inconsistent (adjective) — not staying the same, or containing parts that contradict each other. Noun: inconsistency.

B · Which term means…?

Three terms: look back on · piece together · cross-check. Say the right one, then reveal.

Which term means to think about the past, especially an earlier part of your life?
look back on — Looking back on that year, she saw how much she had changed.
Which term means to understand a situation or reconstruct what happened by putting small facts together?
piece together — The police pieced together the story from small clues.
Which term means to check information by comparing it with other sources?
cross-check — He cross-checked each date against his old notes. Also a noun: a cross-check.

C · Which word completes all three phrases?

One missing word fits every phrase in the group. Say it, then reveal.

a vivid ___  ·  lose your ___  ·  from ___
memory — the ability to remember, or a particular thing that you remember.
a reliable ___  ·  a first-hand ___  ·  give an ___ of what happened
account — a description of something that happened, given by someone who was there or who investigated.
strong ___  ·  a lack of ___  ·  the ___ points to
evidence — facts or signs that show whether something is true.

Now use them — out loud

Before we read:
  • What is the most reliable record of your own life, a photograph, a diary, other people's stories?
  • When have you had to piece together what happened from small clues?
  • Which of your own old memories do you trust least?

The story, in three parts

Read each part. After it, answer the quick check from memory, then discuss one question.

Part 1 — The index

The narrator is a devoted record-keeper. He fills notebook after notebook with what he sees and does, and he numbers them and keeps an index so that any entry can be found again. He dates events not by a calendar but by what happened that year: the year a particular bird arrived in a particular hall, the year of a great flood.

To him the journals are not a hobby. They are how he knows who he is. If he forgets something, he can look it up. If he is confused, he can read what he wrote on a calmer day.

This habit gives the book much of its texture. We read his entries as he writes them, in the present tense of a mind that is organised, patient and trusting of its own words.

Quick check — from memory, then reveal:

1. How does he date events?

2. Why do the journals matter to him?

3. What do we read in the book?

1. By what happened that year, not by a calendar.

2. They are how he knows who he is and finds what he has forgotten.

3. His entries, written in an organised, patient voice.

Discuss:
  • A diary is a kind of conversation with your future self. What would you like to say to yours?

Part 2 — Notes that do not fit

Gradually, the journals begin to cause a different feeling. The narrator finds older pages in which he seems to be a slightly different person. He used other words, held other beliefs and wrote about things he cannot now recall. His records, which he trusted completely, do not match the picture in his head.

He does what a careful person does. He reads again, compares entries and tries to find a pattern. He is not alarmed at first. A gap, he reasons, may only be a gap.

But the book makes us feel the cost of a good index. The more precisely he records, the more clearly he sees what is missing.

Quick check — from memory, then reveal:

1. What does he find in the older pages?

2. How does he react?

3. What is the cost of keeping a good record?

1. That he seems to be a slightly different person, using other words and referring to things he cannot recall.

2. Carefully, by reading again and comparing entries, not with alarm at first.

3. The more precisely he records, the more clearly he sees what is missing.

Discuss:
  • If your own notes disagreed with your memory, which would you believe? Why?

Part 3 — Who writes the past?

The idea behind this part of the novel is old and unsettling: a person is partly the story they can tell about themselves. If someone else controls the records, or if the records stop, what happens to the person?

The narrator has to decide how far he can trust a version of himself that he cannot remember. He is also learning that the people around him may have reasons to prefer one version over another.

Readers often talk about this as the heart of the book. It is not a mystery with a single answer. It is a question about how we know who we are: memory, evidence or the account other people give.

Quick check — from memory, then reveal:

1. What is the old idea behind this part of the novel?

2. What does the narrator have to decide?

3. Why do readers think of this as the heart of the book?

1. That a person is partly the story they can tell about themselves.

2. How far he can trust a version of himself that he cannot remember.

3. Because it is a question about how we know who we are, not a puzzle with one answer.

Discuss:
  • How much of who you are depends on what you remember, and how much on what other people remember about you?

How the tool works

When you try to reconstruct the past, it helps to separate two things: what you wrote down and what you remember. Put them on a grid and you get four places a fact can be. The Memory Grid asks two questions about any fact: is it written down? and do I remember it?

MEMORY ONLYremembered,not writtenSOLIDwritten andrememberedUNKNOWNno record,no memoryRECORD ONLYwritten down,forgottenWritten down?Remembered?noyesyesno

Using it, step by step

  1. Pick one fact about the past: a date, a conversation, a decision. Say it in one sentence.
  2. Ask the two questions. Is there a record of it, a note, a photo, a message? Do I actually remember it?
  3. Place it in a box. Solid facts have a record and a memory. Record only means trust the paper but check the feeling. Memory only means be careful. Unknown means do not claim it.
  4. Say it with the right strength. I know that… I have a note that says… I seem to remember… I cannot say. The box tells you how sure to sound.

Try it yourself

Each sentence is about a fact from the past. Which box of the Memory Grid is it?

1. I remember the meeting clearly, and the minutes confirm the date.
2. I think I said something about it at the time, but I did not write anything.
3. My diary says I was in Lisbon that week, though I cannot recall it at all.
4. Nobody wrote it down and nobody I know can say what happened.
5. There is a photograph of the day, but I have no memory of it.
6. The receipt shows the date and I clearly remember the meal.
7. I am quite sure he said it, but I have nothing to prove it.
8. I honestly have no idea where I was that afternoon, and there is nothing to check.

1. Solid — remembered and written down.

2. Memory only — a memory with no record, so be careful how strongly you state it.

3. Record only — written down, not remembered.

4. Unknown — no record and no memory.

5. Record only — the photo is the record.

6. Solid — both a record and a memory.

7. Memory only — memory with no support.

8. Unknown — neither a memory nor a record.

Where the tool breaks

Records can be wrong too. A diary written in a bad mood or an old email can be inaccurate. Record only is not the same as true.

Memory changes. Each time we remember something we rebuild it, so a very vivid memory can still be mistaken.

Other people's accounts are a third source. When yours disagrees with theirs, put both on the grid.

Talk it through:
  • Is there a fact in your life that lives only in your memory, with no record at all?
  • Do you trust records more than memory? Does it depend on who made the record?

Its cousins

Meeting 1: The HouseThe previous meeting: the world of the book and how to describe a place. Open the lesson →
Meeting 3: The OtherThe next meeting: whose version of events do you trust? Open the lesson →
Piranesi Book Club: the whole seriesFour meetings, one book. Open the lesson →
Persepolis: Whose Story Is It?A memoir that admits that memory is not the same as fact. Open the lesson →

Language — Certainty and doubt about the past

When you talk about what happened, the language you choose shows how sure you are. A small set of verbs and modals lets you say exactly how much you know.

Modals of deduction in the past: He must have written it on a good day. It can't have happened that way. She might have forgotten. They could have been mistaken. Must have for strong belief, can't have for strong disbelief, might / could have for possibility.
Seem and appear + perfect infinitive: He seems to have lost track of the date. The pages appear to have been written by someone else. These sound careful and slightly formal.
I seem to remember / If I remember rightly: I seem to remember that it was raining. If I remember rightly, we left on a Tuesday. They tell the listener that you are not certain.

1. Choose the modal

Complete each sentence with must have, can't have or might have, and the verb in brackets.

1. The entry is in his handwriting, so he (write) it himself.

2. She was abroad that week, so she (see) him on Monday.

3. I am not sure, but he (leave) the book on the train.

4. The ink is still wet, so someone (be) here a minute ago.

1. must have written — strong belief

2. can't have seen — strong disbelief

3. might have left — possibility

4. must have been — strong belief from evidence

2. Say it carefully

Rewrite each sentence with the word in brackets so that it sounds less certain.

1. He forgot the date. (seems)

2. The pages were written by two people. (appear)

3. It rained that day. (I seem to remember)

4. She left in the spring. (If I remember rightly)

1. He seems to have forgotten the date.

2. The pages appear to have been written by two people.

3. I seem to remember that it rained that day.

4. If I remember rightly, she left in the spring.

Now tell a memory in four sentences. Use one must have, one might have and one I seem to remember.

Speak

Choose a task, start the timer and talk. On your own it works as a talk; with a partner or a group, take turns and respond to each other.

Useful language: “I seem to remember…” · “It must have been…” · “I have it written down that…” · “I can’t be sure, but…” · “The record says… but I remember…”
Time remaining: 4:00
Task 1 — Write it down

The narrator records everything. What would you want to record about your own life, and what would you prefer to forget? Explain why.

Task 2 — The grid and you

Choose one event from your past. Put it on the Memory Grid and say how sure you are, using the right strength of language.

Task 3 — Two versions

Tell us about a time when you and another person remembered the same event differently. What was the difference? Who was right, and how could you find out?

To finish — the harder questions

  1. Is a person more than the story they can tell about themselves?
  2. If you found a notebook you had written ten years ago, what would you hope to find in it?
  3. Would you rather have a perfect record of your life or a perfect memory? Why?
  4. From memory: explain the Memory Grid in five sentences, using record, must have and I seem to remember.