Define miracles and examine religious claims against scientific explanation.
Test your understanding of evolution.
A miracle is an event that seems to violate laws of nature, attributed to divine intervention.
David Hume (1711โ1776): Miracles violate natural law. But natural law is established by firm experience. Testimony is less reliable than law. So it is always more rational to doubt miracles.
Thomas Aquinas: Miracles are not violations of nature but God working through creation in unexpected ways.
Christianity: Resurrection of Jesus, healing miracles, transubstantiation (bread = Christ's body).
Islam: Qur'an itself is called a miracle (God's perfect word). Miracles of the Prophet.
Buddhism: Miraculous powers mentioned but downplayed. Real miracle is enlightenment.
Pilgrimage site in France. Church carefully investigates healing claims; only 70 officially recognized as "medically inexplicable."
But spontaneous remission happens naturally in 1-2% of cancers. Does "medically inexplicable" prove divine causation?
Answer: Event attributed to divine intervention that seems to violate natural law.
Answer: Testimony is less reliable than established natural law, so doubt miracles.
Answer: God works through nature in unexpected ways; not violations.
Answer: Pilgrimage site where Church investigates healing claims carefully.
Answer: Yes if miracles are God working through natural processes; No if they violate law.