SHORT HISTORY, LONG ECHOES · B2/C1 · 50 min

Ned Kelly

The Australian bushranger who made himself armour out of plough steel, and became a national argument that has never ended.

Today: you'll tell the story of a poor farmer's son who robbed banks, killed policemen, built armour out of ploughs and split his country's opinion for ever — and you'll master narrative time clauses, the structures English uses to pin down exactly when each thing happened: as, just as, no sooner… than, hardly… when, by the time.
Warm up — a few words worth carrying with you. Each one comes from an earlier story in this series. Met it before? Say what it means and use it in a sentence of your own. New to you? Even better. Reveal to check, and follow a link if you'd like the story it came from.
a fugitive — from Alcatraz
What does it mean? Use it about someone the police are hunting.
a fugitive (n) — a person who is running away and hiding, usually from the law.
a gang — from The Kray Twins
What does it mean? What holds a gang together?
a gang (n) — an organised group of criminals; also any tight group acting together.
the frontier — from The Wild West
What does it mean? Who is drawn to one?
the frontier (n) — the edge of settled land, where law and government are thin.
a trial — from The Salem Witch Trials
What does it mean? What makes a trial a fair one?
a trial (n) — the formal examination of evidence in court to decide whether someone is guilty.
a legend — from King Arthur
What does it mean? How does a legend differ from a fact?
a legend (n) — an old story widely believed but never proved; also a person such stories grow around.

Now — the words for today's story

Today the definitions come first. Below is a word bank, and under it ten definitions. Read each one aloud and say which word from the bank it belongs to — before you look. Then reveal to check the word and its class. All ten appear in the story.

WORD BANK
siege · defiance · destitute · harbour · outlaw · reprieve · folk hero · ambush · grievance · transport
1. (noun) A wrong someone believes has been done to them, and the lasting anger it leaves. Which word?
a grievance (n) — a complaint about unfair treatment, and the resentment that goes with it.
2. (verb, historical) To send a convicted criminal overseas to a distant colony as a punishment. Which word?
to transport (v) — to send a convicted person to a penal colony abroad: he was transported.
3. (adjective) Extremely poor — without money, food or property of any kind. Which word?
destitute (adj) — having no money and no possessions at all; in complete poverty.
4. (noun) Someone formally placed outside the law's protection, so ordinary legal rights no longer apply. Which word?
an outlaw (n) — a person put outside the law's protection, who may be arrested — or shot — on sight.
5. (verb) To attack suddenly from a hidden position, after lying in wait. Which word?
to ambush (v) — to attack by surprise from concealment; also a noun, an ambush.
6. (verb) To hide and protect someone the authorities want — or to keep a feeling quietly inside you. Which word? (It has two lives.)
to harbour (v) — 1. to shelter and conceal a wanted person: to harbour fugitives; 2. to keep a feeling in your mind: to harbour a grudge.
7. (noun) An operation in which a building is surrounded and cut off until those inside surrender. Which word?
a siege (n) — the surrounding of a place by armed force until those inside give up; to be under siege.
8. (noun) Open, deliberate refusal to obey — resistance shown rather than hidden. Which word?
defiance (n) — open resistance to authority; in defiance of = openly against.
9. (noun) An official cancellation or delay of a punishment, especially a death sentence. Which word?
a reprieve (n) — an official decision to cancel or delay a punishment, especially an execution.
10. (noun) An ordinary person celebrated in songs and stories, often for standing up to power. Which word?
a folk hero (n) — someone admired and mythologised by ordinary people, whatever the official verdict.

Now use them — out loud

Before we open the story — say these out loud:
  • From grievance, outlaw, siege and reprieve alone, predict the shape of this man's life: how did it begin, and how did it end?
  • Rank the ten words from most to least sympathetic to the man. Which would his supporters have used, and which the police? Defend the order.

The story, in three parts

Read each part. After it there's a quick check — try it from memory first — then one thing to discuss.

Part 1 — A family at war with the law

Edward Kelly was born in the colony of Victoria, in south-eastern Australia, around 1854. Even the date is uncertain, which tells you much about the family he arrived in. His father, John Kelly — Red to everyone — had been transported from Ireland as a convict, sentenced for theft and shipped to Van Diemen's Land. His sentence served, he crossed to the mainland, married an Irish girl called Ellen Quinn, and set about scratching a living out of a few hard acres. The Kellys were Irish, Catholic and poor, and in colonial Victoria each of those facts came with a price. By the time Ned was about twelve his father was dead, worn out and recently out of gaol again, and the family he left behind was very nearly destitute. Ellen was raising a crowd of children on land that barely fed them, and Ned, the eldest son, became the man of the house long before he had finished being a boy. He grew up knowing exactly where the family stood in the order of things: at the bottom, and watched.

To understand what came next, you need the quarrel running through the district. The colony had passed laws to break up the enormous sheep runs of wealthy graziers — the squatters — and let ordinary families "select" small farms of their own. In practice the selectors got the poor country, the squatters kept the water and the grass, and the two sides settled into a slow, bitter war over fences, stray cattle and unbranded horses. The police stood, or seemed to stand, on the squatters' side. To a poor Irish selector family, a constable was not a neutral keeper of the peace; he was the sharp end of somebody else's property. Suspicion ran both ways, and both ways had evidence. Stock did disappear, and Kelly relatives were involved in some of it; equally, the police watched the Kellys constantly and treated the whole clan as guilty by name. Out of that daily friction grew the grievance later written down at enormous length: the conviction that the law in Victoria was not a shield for people like them but a weapon against them.

Ned was in trouble from his teens. At fourteen or fifteen he rode for a while with an old bushranger, Harry Power, learning the trade from the inside; he was charged, released, charged again, and at sixteen was sent to prison for three years over a stolen horse he insisted he had not known was stolen. He came out hardened. Then, in April 1878, came the incident that lit everything. A young constable named Alexander Fitzpatrick rode alone to the Kelly homestead to arrest Ned's brother Dan. What happened inside is disputed to this day: Fitzpatrick swore Ned had shot him in the wrist; the family swore Ned was not even in the colony, and that the constable had arrived half-drunk and behaved badly. The court believed the constable. Ellen Kelly, with a baby at her breast, was sentenced to three years' hard labour, and two neighbours got six. As far as Ned was concerned, that settled the question of whether justice existed for the Kellys.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. Why were poor Irish selector families like the Kellys so hostile to the police?

2. What was the Fitzpatrick incident, and what were its consequences for the family?

1. Selectors got poor land while wealthy squatters kept the best of it, and the police seemed to enforce the squatters' interests, pursuing Irish Catholic families like the Kellys as routine. The law felt like one class's weapon against another.

2. In 1878 Constable Fitzpatrick came alone to arrest Dan Kelly, then claimed Ned had shot him in the wrist. The family denied Ned was even there. The court believed the constable: Ellen Kelly was jailed for three years, and Ned and Dan took to the bush.

Discuss:
  • Kelly's supporters say injustice made him; his critics say plenty of equally poor families never shot anyone. How far can a hard start excuse what a person becomes?

Part 2 — Outlaws

Ned and Dan went into the ranges and did not come out. Two friends joined them — Joe Byrne, quick-witted and literate, and Steve Hart, young and reckless — and the four camped in the wild country of the Wombat Ranges while the police organised search parties. In October 1878 four constables rode out from Mansfield and made camp at Stringybark Creek. They were hunting men who were already watching them. The Kellys ambushed the camp. Ned called on the police to surrender; there was shooting; three of the four — Lonigan, Scanlan and Sergeant Kennedy — were killed, and the fourth, McIntyre, escaped on a horse and rode for his life. Whatever else was arguable about Ned Kelly, this was not: three officers of the law lay dead in the bush, one of them, by Kelly's own account, finished off at close range because he was dying anyway. Hardly had the news reached Melbourne when the colony's parliament passed a Felons Apprehension Act declaring the four outlaws: they could now be shot on sight by anyone, and anyone who chose to harbour them faced prison.

What followed made them famous. In December 1878 the gang rode into Euroa, held the staff of a nearby station quietly captive, and robbed the National Bank with a courtesy that astonished the witnesses. Two months later they crossed into New South Wales and took the whole town of Jerilderie, locking the two local policemen in their own cells, putting on police uniforms, and walking about the town for two days before robbing the bank at their leisure. It was there that Kelly produced the document that changed how he would be remembered. Over thousands of words, dictated to Joe Byrne, he set out his case: the treatment of poor Irish settlers, the conduct of the police, the injustice done to his mother — the accumulated grievance of his life and his class. He wanted it printed. The newspaper man could not be found, so it was pressed on a bank employee instead, and the Jerilderie Letter stayed largely unpublished for decades — a furious, funny, threatening, half-literate masterpiece that reads like a man shouting at a country.

For nearly two years the four simply vanished whenever the police came near. That was not luck: in the north-east the gang was fed, hidden, warned and lied about by a network of relatives and sympathisers who saw them as their own. Police arrested dozens of these supporters and held them for months without trial, turning many neutral farmers into Kelly sympathisers overnight. The reward climbed to £8,000 for the gang — a fortune beyond the imagining of any farm labourer — and still nobody talked. The government poured in police and black trackers from Queensland, and Melbourne newspapers raged about the humiliation of the colony. Officers watched the gang's relatives, cut off their supplies and offered money in every pub in the district; still the four moved by night through country they had known since childhood, sleeping in huts whose owners would later swear they had seen nothing at all. Out in the ranges, meanwhile, the outlaws' defiance began to look, to a certain kind of reader, less like crime than like politics: four young men whom the poor would not betray, whatever was offered.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What happened at Stringybark Creek, and what did the government do in response?

2. What was the Jerilderie Letter, and why does it matter?

1. In October 1878 the gang ambushed a four-man police camp; three were killed and one escaped. Parliament responded with an act declaring the gang outlaws, who could be shot on sight, with prison for anyone who harboured them.

2. A very long statement Kelly dictated at Jerilderie in 1879, setting out his grievances about the police, the courts and the treatment of poor Irish selectors. He wanted it printed; it wasn't, at the time. It turned a bushranger into a voice.

Discuss:
  • Ordinary families sheltered the gang for two years against an enormous reward. Does that loyalty prove something about the injustice of the time — or only that people feared their neighbours more than the state?

Part 3 — Glenrowan, the rope, and the argument that never ended

The end, when it came, was planned as a massacre and turned into a legend. In late June 1880 Joe Byrne shot Aaron Sherritt, a former friend suspected of informing for the police. The killing was bait: the gang knew a special police train would be sent north from Melbourne, so they rode to the small town of Glenrowan, tore up a stretch of line beyond the station, and waited for the train to be thrown off the rails. Meanwhile they took over Ann Jones's hotel and held some sixty townspeople inside, feeding them, singing and even dancing with them through the night. It came apart because of a schoolteacher: Thomas Curnow talked his way out, and just as the train approached the broken line he stood on the track with a candle and a red scarf and stopped it. The siege ran through the dark hours, bullets tearing through the weatherboard walls, hostages screaming to be let out; a boy and an old man among the civilians were fatally hit. By the time the sun came up, Joe Byrne was dead on the barroom floor.

Then, out of the mist behind the police lines, came the image Australia has never got rid of. Ned Kelly walked slowly towards them in a suit of armour he and his friends had beaten out of the mouldboards and shares of stolen ploughs: a cylindrical helmet with a slot for the eyes, a breastplate, a backplate, an apron — tens of kilograms of farm iron. Bullets struck him and bounced. He tapped his chest and laughed at them. For several extraordinary minutes the police thought they were shooting at a ghost, and their fire did nothing at all. But a ploughshare covers a chest, not a leg. As they realised what they were looking at they fired low, and once his legs were hit he went down in the wet grass and was taken alive. His brother Dan and Steve Hart died in the hotel, which burned; whether they were shot or took their own lives has never been settled.

He was tried in Melbourne that October before Judge Redmond Barry — the judge who had sentenced his mother — and convicted of the murder of Constable Lonigan. Petitions for a reprieve gathered tens of thousands of signatures and crowds met in Melbourne to demand one, but the government would not move, and he was hanged at Old Melbourne Gaol on 11 November 1880, aged about twenty-five. Tradition says he met it with the words "Such is life"; the phrase is famous, but the evidence is thin and other accounts differ, so it is better treated as legend than record. Barry himself died less than a fortnight later. And then the argument began, and never stopped. To some Australians Kelly is a folk hero, a poor man's champion whose defiance spoke for a whole class; to others, a man who shot three policemen and hid behind hostages. Sidney Nolan's paintings of the black helmet against a burning landscape made him a national symbol, novels and films keep re-fighting his case, and the armour itself stands in the State Library of Victoria, dented and rusted, while people queue to see it and disagree.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What was the gang's plan at Glenrowan, and why did it fail?

2. Why does the armour work so well as a symbol — and what was its fatal weakness?

1. They killed a suspected informer to draw a police train north, tore up the line to derail it, and held the town hostage in a hotel. The schoolteacher Thomas Curnow got out and stopped the train with a light and a red scarf; the police then besieged the building.

2. It is a poor farmer's answer to state power — protection beaten out of the ploughs of the land itself — and unmistakable in outline. Its weakness: it covered only body and head, so his legs were bare, and that is where the police brought him down.

Discuss:
  • Nations choose their heroes carefully. What does it say about Australia that one of its most recognisable national images is a convicted police-killer in a home-made iron helmet?

Grammar — narrative time clauses

This story lives or dies on timing. The news had hardly reached Melbourne when parliament outlawed the gang; just as the train neared the broken rails, a schoolteacher stepped onto the track; by the time the sun rose, Joe Byrne was dead. English has time clauses built for exactly this — for saying whether two events overlapped, followed instantly, or had already finished before another began.

How they are built:
• as + clause — two actions together: "As the police fired, the bullets bounced off the iron."
• just as + clause — the exact moment: "Just as the train approached, Curnow stepped onto the line."
• by the time + clause — the other action is already complete, so the main clause usually takes the past perfect: "By the time the sun came up, Byrne had died."
• no sooner … than — one thing follows another instantly. Formal, and it inverts: "No sooner had he stepped out of the mist than the firing began."
• hardly / scarcely … when — same idea, different partner: "Hardly had the news arrived when the act was passed."
When we choose which:
• as gives background; just as makes the listener feel a coincidence.
• by the time shows someone was too late: "By the time the police reached the hotel, the gang had already taken sixty hostages."
• No sooner … than and hardly … when are dramatic and literary — one or two per story is plenty. Watch the partners: no sooner takes than, hardly takes when. Mixing them is the classic mistake.
• With inversion the auxiliary comes first: No sooner had he arrived…, never No sooner he had arrived…

1. Rewrite the moment

Rewrite each pair as one sentence, using the structure in brackets. Say it aloud first.

1. The gang arrived at Glenrowan. They immediately took over the hotel. (no sooner)
No sooner at Glenrowan than they took over the hotel.

2. The police reached the hotel. The gang had already taken sixty hostages. (by the time)
By the time the police the hotel, the gang had already taken sixty hostages.

3. Kelly stepped out of the mist. The shooting started at once. (hardly)
Hardly out of the mist when the shooting started.

1. had the gang arrived (no sooner + inversion + than)

2. reached (by the time + past simple; the past perfect sits in the main clause)

3. had Kelly stepped (hardly + inversion + when)

2. Find the fault

Each sentence has one error in its time clause. Write the corrected part.

1. No sooner the letter was finished when Kelly demanded that it be printed. →

2. By the time the train arrived, Curnow already warned the driver. →

3. Just as the sun had risen, a figure in iron walked out of the mist. →

1. No sooner was the letter finished than… (inversion; no sooner takes than)

2. …Curnow had already warned the driver. (by the time needs the past perfect)

3. Just as the sun rose, … (just as marks one shared moment, so the past simple is right)

3. Complete the passage

Fill each gap with a time expression from today's list — as, just as, by the time, when, than. More than one answer is sometimes possible; read it aloud when you finish.

the gang reached Glenrowan, they tore up the line and waited. the police train drew near, a schoolteacher stepped onto the track with a candle. No sooner had the driver seen the light he braked. the shooting stopped, three of the four outlaws were dead, and the crowd had grasped what it was seeing, the man in the iron helmet had already fallen.

Model answers: As (or When) · Just as · than · By the time · by the time (or before)

Notice: as and just as hold two actions in one moment; by the time says someone was too late.

Hold on to these time clauses — you'll need them in the Speak tab, where the whole point is making your listener feel exactly when each thing happened.

Hear it for real

You've read the story and you have the words — so now the real thing is within reach. There's a full podcast episode that tells this story in much greater depth, in natural, real-speed English. It's optional: the lesson stands on its own without it.

🎧 Heard it already? Then treat everything so far as your recap — and listen out below for the extra detail the episode adds. Haven't? You've lost nothing: you now know the story and the key vocabulary, which is exactly what makes a fast native podcast suddenly followable. Listen before next time.

Short History Of… Ned Kelly

From the Noiser podcast network. Hosted by historians, roughly 50 minutes. Search "Short History Of Ned Kelly" on Spotify to open the episode.

Open the show on Spotify →

Listen out for — and bring back to talk about

As you listen (now or for homework):
  • The episode goes far deeper into the night of the siege at Glenrowan — the hostages, the singing, the schoolteacher. What does it reveal about those hours that this lesson left out?
  • Find one detail the episode adds — a person, a place, a moment at Stringybark Creek — and explain it in your own words. Does it make you more or less sympathetic to Kelly?
  • Listen for two or three of today's key words used naturally by the historians (outlaw, siege, grievance, ambush, reprieve, defiance…). How exactly did they use them?

Speak

This is the heart of the lesson — do all of it out loud. The timer is there to keep you going: fill the time with detail rather than escaping it.

Useful language: drive the story with time clauses — as the police closed in…, just as the train approached…, no sooner had he stepped out than…, hardly had the news arrived when…, by the time the sun came up…. For opinions: "What's hard to get past is…", "You could argue that…", "It's tempting to say… but…", "Whatever you think of him, the fact remains…".
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Tell the whole story (4 minutes)

Tell the story of Ned Kelly in your own words, as if to someone who has never heard the name. Follow the arc: a transported convict's son on poor land → Fitzpatrick and his mother's imprisonment → Stringybark Creek and the outlawry → Euroa, Jerilderie and the letter → the night at Glenrowan → the armour, the capture, the rope → the argument that never ended.

Use narrative time clauses to drive it (as, just as, no sooner… than, hardly… when, by the time) — at least four of them — and work in at least five key words (grievance, transport, destitute, outlaw, ambush, harbour, siege, defiance, reprieve, folk hero).

Task B · Folk hero or murderer? (4 minutes)

Australia has argued about this for well over a century. Take a side, build the strongest case you can, then argue the other just as hard. Weigh the real grievances of poor selectors and the treatment of his mother against three dead policemen and a hotel full of hostages. Where does legitimate anger stop and murder begin?

Task C · An outlaw of your own (4 minutes)

Every country keeps a few celebrated lawbreakers. Describe one from your own culture — or a modern figure who plays the same role — and tell their story with the grammar: as the authorities closed in…, by the time anyone realised…, no sooner had they… than…. Then say whether the admiration is deserved.

Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it:

  • A bandit, rebel or smuggler from your history who is still sung about.
  • Someone your country celebrates who broke the law for a cause, and divides opinion because of it.
  • A whistleblower or hacker who is a criminal to one side and a hero to the other.
  • A protest or strike in your lifetime where you had to choose a side.
  • A film or novel that made you sympathise with someone you ought to have condemned.
  • An object — a mask, a flag, a piece of clothing — that became a movement's symbol, as Kelly's helmet did.

To finish — the bigger questions

  1. The Jerilderie Letter turned a bushranger into a voice. How much of Kelly's reputation rests on his being able to explain himself — and what of all those who couldn't?
  2. Whole districts hid the gang for two years against an enormous reward. When a community shields a criminal on that scale, what is it telling us about the state?
  3. The armour sits in a Melbourne library and people still queue to see it. Should nations preserve the relics of their most uncomfortable heroes, or does display become endorsement?
  4. Before you go — from memory: tell the last twelve hours at Glenrowan in five sentences, using by the time, just as, no sooner… than, hardly… when and as — one in each sentence.