SHORT STORIES, LONG SHADOWS · B2/C1 · 50 min

After Twenty Years

O. Henry's story of a promise kept exactly, by both men, and what it cost.

Today: you'll take apart a story in which every sentence is true and nothing is honest — and you'll bring the whole perfect system under control: have done, had done, will have done, having done.
Warm up — before we read. Talk these through out loud. There are no wrong answers.
Discuss:
  • What obligations, if any, survive twenty years of silence between two people?
  • Can someone change fundamentally, or does character simply become more visible with time?
  • Where exactly does loyalty to a person stop being a virtue?

Now — the words for today's story

Ten words unlock the story. Work through the four activities — say your answer out loud before you reveal it.

A · What do they mean here? Work it out from the sentence

1. He covered the same streets in the same order every night, trying the doors of the closed shops as he went. It was a quiet beat, and he knew every doorway on it.
a beat (n) — the fixed route a police officer patrols. "An officer on the beat." (Also: a journalist's regular subject area.)
2. The restaurant that had stood on the corner was gone; the windows of the building were covered with planks and the doorway smelled of rain. The place had been boarded up for years.
boarded up — closed off with wooden boards. Used of abandoned buildings; carries a whole atmosphere of decline in two words.
3. He described the arrangement without a flicker of doubt, as a man describes something that has never once been open to question. His manner was entirely matter-of-fact.
matter-of-fact (adj) — plain, unemotional, treating something extraordinary as ordinary. Adverb: matter-of-factly.

B · Which word means…?

Three words from the story: apprehend · rendezvous · plain clothes. Say the right word, then reveal.

1. Which word means an arranged meeting, at a set time and place, often secret?
a rendezvous (n, from French) — pronounced /ˈrɒndɪvuː/. Also a verb: to rendezvous with someone.
2. Which phrase means ordinary clothes worn by an officer so that nobody knows what they are?
plain clothes — "a plain clothes detective". The whole plot turns on the fact that a uniform announces a man and ordinary clothes conceal him.
3. Which word means to arrest someone — the formal, official term?
to apprehend (v) — formal for "to arrest". (It also means "to understand", and "to fear".) Noun: apprehension, which carries both senses.

C · Choose the meaning — a / b / c

1. As boys they had been inseparable: the same streets, the same school, every evening of every week. Inseparable means…
  (a) constantly together and impossible to divide   (b) fiercely competitive   (c) very similar in appearance
(a) — inseparable (adj) = never apart. Built from separate + in-. Compare indispensable, invaluable.
2. He could not bring himself to make the arrest, so he sent a colleague instead. This means he…
  (a) was physically prevented   (b) was capable of it but could not force himself   (c) had no legal authority
(b) — can't bring yourself to do something = the obstacle is internal, not external. "I couldn't bring myself to tell her."

D · Word building & collocation

1. You know loyal. Give the noun, the negative adjective, and complete the phrase describing exactly Jimmy's position: divided ___.
loyalty (n) · disloyal (adj) · divided loyalties — the state of owing allegiance to two things that now conflict. That phrase is the whole story in two words.
2. One verb completes all three: to ___ an appointment · to ___ your word · to ___ faith with someone. And which verb replaces it in all three when the person fails?
keep — keep an appointment / your word / faith with someone. When they fail: break. Note that both men keep the appointment; only one of them keeps faith.

Now use them — out loud

Talk it through before we read:
  • Using rendezvous, plain clothes, divided loyalties and apprehend, predict how a twenty-year reunion could go wrong.
  • Sort today's words into the language of friendship and the language of policing. Which sit uncomfortably in both?

The story, in three parts

Read each part. After it, there's a quick comprehension check (try the questions from memory first), then one thing to discuss.

Part 1 — The man in the doorway

It was barely ten o'clock, but a chilly wind with a taste of rain in it had emptied the streets. The officer moved up the avenue impressively, trying the doors of the closed shops as he went, turning now and then to cast his watchful eye down the pacific thoroughfare. The neighbourhood was one that kept early hours.

In the darkened doorway of a hardware store a man was leaning, an unlit cigar in his mouth. As the officer approached, the man spoke up quickly, as men do when they wish to be looked at before they are examined. It was all right, he said; he was waiting for a friend. It was an appointment made twenty years ago. It sounded a little funny, he supposed, and he was perfectly willing to explain it, if the officer wanted to be sure everything was straight.

Twenty years ago, he said, there had been a restaurant on this corner. He and his closest friend, Jimmy Wells, had dined there the night before he went west. They had been raised in this city together, inseparable as brothers, and they had understood perfectly well that a thousand miles and twenty years would either make them or finish them. So they had fixed a rendezvous: this doorway, this hour, this date, two decades on, whatever their circumstances and whatever the distance. He struck a match to light his cigar, and the small flame threw up a pale, square-jawed face with keen eyes and a little white scar near the right eyebrow. Then the light went out.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What agreement did the two men make, and under what circumstances?

2. What does the match reveal — and why does O. Henry place that detail exactly there?

1. To meet at the same spot, same hour, exactly twenty years later, regardless of circumstances — made on their last evening together before he left for the West.

2. A square-jawed face with keen eyes and a small white scar. It is placed there because the officer is looking at it: on a second reading, this is the moment the story's real event occurs.

Discuss:
  • The narrator tells us nothing about the officer's reaction to that face. What is gained by the omission — and what would a lesser writer have added?

Part 2 — Two versions of a life

Had he kept in touch with his friend, the officer asked. For a while, the man said — they had corresponded for a year or two, and then the West had taken hold of him and the letters had stopped. But he had no doubt whatever that Jimmy would come, if he were alive at all. Jimmy was the truest, staunchest old chap in the world; he would never forget. A thousand miles could not alter a man like that.

The West, he explained, had made him. He had gone out with nothing and had worked like a dog for everything he had, and now he had a good deal. A man had to compete out there, he said; it kept you sharp. He drew out a handsome pocket watch, its lid set with small diamonds, and consulted it: three minutes to ten. Jimmy, of course, had stayed here in the old city, plodding along in the same steady groove — the finest fellow in the world, but slow. New York was a place that kept a man in a rut. It took the West to make anything of you.

The officer said he hoped the friend would come, wished him a good night, and moved on along his beat, trying doors as he went. A fine, cold drizzle had begun to fall, and the wind had risen from a doubtful puff into a steady blow. The man in the doorway turned up his collar and settled back to wait, ten minutes past the hour, then twenty.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. How does the waiting man characterise his own twenty years, and his friend's?

2. What does the officer say and do at the end of the conversation?

1. His own: hard work, competition, and considerable money — the West made him. His friend's: steady, unchanging, decent but slow, kept in a rut by the old city.

2. He hopes the friend turns up, says goodnight, and walks on trying shop doors — behaving in every respect like a man with nothing on his mind.

Discuss:
  • He praises Jimmy and patronises him in the same breath. What has twenty years of "competing out there" done to how he measures a life?

Part 3 — Under the chemist's light

At last a tall man in a long overcoat came hurrying across the avenue, collar turned up to his ears, and made straight for the doorway. Was that Bob? he asked. Was that Jimmy Wells? cried the man in the doorway. They seized each other by the arms, both talking at once, and set off up the street together, the man from the West laying out the history of his career while the taller man listened, his hands deep in his pockets.

At the corner they came into the glare of an electric light in a chemist's window, and Bob turned to look at his friend's face. He stopped, and let go of the arm. "You're not Jimmy Wells," he said. "Twenty years is a long time, but not long enough to change a man's nose from a Roman to a pug."

"It sometimes changes a good man into a bad one," said the tall man. "You've been under arrest for ten minutes, Silky Bob. Chicago wired us they thought you might be coming our way, and they'd like a word with you. Now, before we go along, here's a note somebody asked me to hand you. You may read it here at the window. It's from Patrolman Wells." Bob unfolded the small piece of paper. His hand was steady enough as he began, and it shook a little by the time he had finished. The note was short. Bob: I was at the appointed place on time. When you struck the match to light your cigar, I saw it was the face of the man wanted in Chicago. Somehow I couldn't do it myself, so I went around and got a plain clothes man to do the job. JIMMY.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. How does Bob detect the substitution, and what is the tall man's reply?

2. Reconstruct Jimmy's evening from the note. What did he do, in what order?

1. By the shape of the nose under a bright light — Roman, not pug. The tall man replies that twenty years sometimes changes a good man into a bad one, and informs him he has been under arrest for ten minutes.

2. He kept the appointment on time, in uniform; recognised Bob's face in the match light as a wanted man; continued the conversation and said goodnight; found he could not make the arrest himself; fetched a plain clothes officer; and wrote a note so that Bob would know he had come.

Discuss:
  • Everything Jimmy says in that doorway is literally true and entirely deceptive. Is that a betrayal, or the most careful kindness available to him?

Grammar — the perfect aspect across time

A story spanning twenty years needs every perfect form English has. The perfect is not a tense but an aspect: it always looks back from a chosen point to something completed or continuing before it.

Looking back from now — present perfect:
• "They haven't seen each other since that night." (the period continues)
• "He has made a fortune." (the result stands now)
Looking back from a point in the past — past perfect:
• "By the time the officer arrived, Bob had been waiting for half an hour."
Looking back from a point in the future — future perfect:
• "By ten o'clock they will have kept the appointment exactly."
• "By next year he'll have been in prison for twelve months."
Continuous perfect forms emphasise duration rather than completion, and often explain a visible state:
• "He had been standing in the rain, and his coat showed it."
• "They have been writing to each other for years."

The perfect infinitive and participle — the forms that make written English compact:
• "He seems to have made a great deal of money." (about an earlier time)
• "He claims to have been working honestly."
• "Having recognised the face, Jimmy walked on."

The trap: a finished time expression forces the simple past. ✗ "I have seen him twenty years ago." ✓ "I saw him twenty years ago."

1. Choose the perfect form the meaning requires

Put the verb in brackets into the correct form.

1. By the time the tall man appeared, Bob (wait) in the doorway for over half an hour.

2. The two friends (not / meet) since the night before he went west.

3. This time next month Bob (be) in custody in Chicago for four weeks.

1. had been waiting (duration up to a past point)

2. haven't met (the period runs up to now)

3. will have been (looking back from a future point)

2. Perfect infinitives and participles

Rewrite each sentence using the words given. Write only the missing words.

1. It seems that he made his money quickly. → He seems his money quickly.

2. He claims that he has been working honestly for years. → He claims honestly for years.

3. Jimmy recognised the face, and then he walked on. → the face, Jimmy walked on.

1. to have made   2. to have been working   3. Having recognised

All three compress two clauses into one — the characteristic move of written English at this level.

3. Reconstruct the twenty years — complete the paragraph

Fill each gap with the form the meaning requires, then read the whole paragraph aloud.

Bob (leave) New York twenty years earlier and (spend) the intervening years in the West. The two men (lose) touch long before the appointment came round. By ten o'clock that evening Bob (stand) in the doorway for some time, and Jimmy, (recognise) him instantly, (already / decide) what he was going to do. Bob appears (make) his fortune by methods the Chicago police would like to discuss. By the end of the week he (be) back in the city he came from.

left · spent · had lost · had been standing · having recognised · had already decided · to have made · will have been

Four different perfect forms doing four different jobs, plus two simple pasts anchored by "twenty years earlier".

Hold on to these — in the Speak tab you'll narrate twenty years in four minutes, which is exactly what the perfect aspect is built for.

Going deeper

O. Henry published this in 1906, in the middle of an astonishing run of New York stories. He knew the world of the story from the inside: he had been convicted of embezzlement in 1898 and served three years, beginning to write seriously in prison. The trick ending was his trademark, but the best of these stories, like this one, use it to withhold a moral rather than to supply one.

The craft. Read it again knowing the ending and the story becomes a different, colder object. Jimmy recognises his oldest friend within seconds — in a match flame, at the exact centre of the second paragraph — and then conducts an entire friendly conversation on top of that knowledge. He asks after himself. He listens to himself described as slow and plodding. He says he hopes the friend turns up. Every word is true; the whole performance is a deception. Notice what O. Henry refuses us: we are never told what Bob did in Chicago, never shown Jimmy's face during that conversation, and never permitted to watch the decision being made. It happens off the page, in the dark, between two lines of dialogue. And notice the final detail, which is the story's real subject. Jimmy could have arranged everything and stayed silent. Instead he writes a note, signed with his first name, whose entire purpose is to tell Bob that he came. He will not make the arrest, and he will not let his friend believe he was stood up.

Talk it through:
  • Is Jimmy's substitution of a colleague a moral evasion, or the only form of decency available to him?
  • The story gives Bob's contemptuous description of Jimmy before we know who is listening to it. What does that structural choice do to us?
  • Bob crossed a continent to keep an appointment while wanted by the police. What does that tell us about him — and does it complicate the arrest?
  • Both men kept the appointment precisely. Is this a story about loyalty honoured or about loyalty exhausted?

Speak

This is the heart of the lesson — do all of it out loud. The timer is there to keep you going: fill the time with detail rather than racing through it.

Useful language: lean on today's grammar — they hadn't seen each other since…, he had been waiting…, having recognised him…, he seems to have…. For judgement: "In his position…", "The decent thing would have been…", "You can see the logic, but…".
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Narrate the whole story (4 minutes)

Tell After Twenty Years as if to someone who has never read it — and keep the reveal until the chemist's window. Move through the arc: the empty avenue and the officer on his beat → the man in the doorway → the appointment made twenty years ago → the match and the scarred face → the two versions of a life → the tall man in the overcoat → the light at the corner → the note.

Use at least three different perfect forms and at least five key words (beat, boarded up, matter-of-fact, rendezvous, plain clothes, apprehend, inseparable, divided loyalties, keep faith, bring himself to).

Task B · Did Jimmy do the right thing? (4 minutes)

Build an argument. He was an officer with a duty and a friend with a promise, and he satisfied both by halves — keeping the appointment, making the arrest, doing neither with his own hands. Take a side, give three reasons, deal with the strongest objection, and state what you would have done walking up to that doorway in uniform.

Then argue the opposite for one minute.

Task C · Time, friendship and obligation (4 minutes)

Take the story's problem outward.

Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it:

  • Describe your longest friendship using the perfect aspect: how long, what has changed, what has survived.
  • Set your own twenty-year rendezvous: where, with whom, and why that place?
  • Do people grow apart through distance or through divergence? Argue for one.
  • Where should professional duty override personal loyalty — medicine, teaching, journalism, policing? Give a hard case.
  • Is anyone entitled to be judged on who they were twenty years ago? Consider both directions.
  • Describe someone you have known a long time who has become unrecognisable — and say whether the change was visible early.

To finish — the bigger questions

  1. The note exists only so that Bob knows Jimmy came. What does that tell you about what Jimmy was trying to preserve?
  2. O. Henry never tells us the crime. Does that omission protect the story or weaken it?
  3. Bob is described as sentimental enough to cross a continent and hard enough to be wanted in Chicago. Are those the same trait in different weather?
  4. Before you go — from memory: produce one present perfect, one past perfect continuous and one perfect infinitive about this story — and explain why "I have seen him twenty years ago" is impossible.