IDEAS & HISTORY · B2/C1 · 50 min

Nothing Like a Dream

“There is nothing like a dream to create the future” is one of the most quoted lines in Les Misérables. This is the true story of where Victor Hugo actually wrote it — about the young dreamers of 1832, in a novel he completed in exile.

Today: you'll find the real sentence behind a famous quotation, follow the writer who heard the shots of 1832 and wrote about them thirty years later, and ask whether a dream that fails can still build the future. You'll also practise the grammar historians use to look forward from the past: he was to spend fifteen years on Guernsey · the rising was doomed to fail · they would never see the republic.
Before we start. Have a go — there are no wrong answers.
Discuss:
  • “There is nothing like a dream to create the future.” Do you agree — or does the future usually come from money, power and luck rather than dreams?
  • Where do you usually see quotations like this one: on posters, on social media, in speeches? Do you ever check who really said them?
  • Have you read Les Misérables, or seen the musical or one of the films? What do you remember — and when do you think the story takes place?

Words from the story

Ten words and phrases in four activities. Say your answer out loud before you reveal it.

A · What does the word in bold mean? Guess from the sentence

1. When the president seized total power, the poet called him a traitor and left the country. Years later he was offered the chance to come home quietly — and refused. He preferred to stay in exile.
exile (n) — living outside your own country because you are forced to, or because you refuse to live under its rulers. Collocations: to go into exile · to live in exile · self-imposed exile · political exile. The verb is to be exiled; a person in exile is an exile.
2. During a general's funeral, part of the crowd raised a red flag, built barricades across the narrow streets and began firing at soldiers. The uprising was over within two days.
an uprising (n) — an attempt by ordinary people to overthrow a government by force, usually smaller than a revolution and often unsuccessful. Collocations: an armed / a popular uprising · to crush / put down / suppress an uprising. Near-synonyms: a rebellion, a revolt, an insurrection (the most formal).
3. Her plan — a city with free schools for every child, no hunger and no prisons — sounded beautiful. But the ministers smiled politely and called it utopian.
utopian (adj) — based on an idea of a perfect society; often used to suggest that the idea is beautiful but unrealistic. Word family: a utopia (n) · utopian (adj) — and the opposite, a dystopia / dystopian: a nightmare society.

B · Which word matches the meaning?

Three words: to suppress · posterity · an idealist. Say the right one, then reveal.

1. Which word means to stop something by force, especially a protest or a rebellion?
to suppress (v) — The army suppressed the rising within two days. The noun is suppression. It is also used for feelings and information: to suppress a yawn · to suppress evidence.
2. Which word means all the people who will live after us; future generations?
posterity (n, uncountable) — to preserve something for posterity · Posterity will judge us. No article: ✗ the posterity.
3. Which word describes a person who believes the world can be made much better — and acts on that belief, sometimes ignoring the practical difficulties?
an idealist (n) — word family: idealism (n), idealistic (adj): a young, idealistic student. The usual contrast is a realist or a pragmatist.

C · Choose the best answer — a, b or c

1. In the original French, Hugo does not say that dreams create the future. He says they engender it — and in the sentence before, that rigid beliefs give birth to dreams. To engender something means to…
  (a) protect something that already exists   (b) cause something to come into existence   (c) predict something accurately
(b) — to engender (v, formal) = to cause, to give rise to. Collocations: to engender trust / fear / debate / hostility. Its oldest meaning is to father a child, which is why it sits so naturally next to give birth. Related to generate.
2. The students' rising was crushed in two days, and many of them died. But some of the ideas they fought for came to fruition decades later. To come to fruition means to…
  (a) be forgotten and later rediscovered   (b) be celebrated openly in public   (c) finally become real or produce the result that was hoped for
(c) — to come to fruition; also to bring a plan to fruition. Fruition is related to fruit: the tree finally gives what it promised. Similar: to bear fruit · to materialise · to come to pass (literary).

D · Two everyday phrases

1. Complete the phrase: "Free school for every child? A vote for every adult? The minister laughed: ‘That's just a ___ dream.’"
pipe — a pipe dream = a hope or plan that is never going to happen. For years, owning a house was just a pipe dream.
2. Complete the phrase: "They lost, and almost nobody remembered them. Looking back, though, many of their ideas were simply ahead of their ___."
time — to be ahead of your time = to have ideas that most people only accept later. The opposite: to be behind the times.

Now use them — out loud

Before we read:
  • The story has three parts: a sentence hidden in the middle of a very long novel, the writer who heard the shots of 1832 and later went into exile, and the real uprising — with what came after it. Use exile, uprising, idealist and come to fruition to guess what happens.
  • Name an idea from history that was called a pipe dream and later became normal.

The story, in three parts

Read each part. Then answer the quick questions from memory before you check. Then discuss the question.

Part 1 — The sentence in the middle of the book

Les Misérables was published in 1862, in five parts: Fantine, Cosette, Marius, Saint-Denis and Jean Valjean. The sentence everyone quotes is not spoken by Jean Valjean, or by any character at all. It is in the third part, Marius, in Book Four, “The Friends of the A B C”, in a chapter Hugo called “A Group Which Barely Missed Becoming Historic”. Hugo stops the plot to describe the mood among young people in Paris in the years before 1832: royalists were becoming liberals, liberals were becoming democrats, and the most serious minds were falling in love with absolute principles.

Then he writes, in the French: « Rien n'est tel que le dogme pour enfanter le rêve. Et rien n'est tel que le rêve pour engendrer l'avenir. Utopie aujourd'hui, chair et os demain. » Isabel Hapgood's English translation of 1887 gives: “There is nothing like dogma for bringing forth dreams. And there is nothing like dreams for engendering the future. Utopia to-day, flesh and blood to-morrow.” Another Victorian translation, by Lascelles Wraxall, is closer to the modern quote: “nothing like a dream to engender the future.”

So the quote on the posters is real, but polished. Engender has become create, and the first half of the thought — that rigid belief is what gives birth to dreams — has quietly disappeared. The chapter goes on to introduce a small society of students, the Friends of the A B C. The name was a pun: in French, A B C sounds like abaissé, “the people pushed down”. In Hapgood's words, the group's object was “apparently the education of children, in reality the elevation of man.” Their leader in the novel is Enjolras, and their dream is a republic.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. Where exactly in the novel does the sentence appear, and who says it?

2. In what two ways is the popular quotation different from what Hugo wrote?

1. Part Three (Marius), Book Four (“The Friends of the A B C”), Chapter One. No character says it: it is the narrator's own comment on the young idealists of the time.

2. “Engender” (French engendrer) has become the simpler “create”, and the sentence before it — that dogma gives birth to dreams — has been cut off.

Discuss:
  • Does it matter that a famous quotation has been polished and shortened, if the meaning survives? When does tidying up a quote become changing it?

Part 2 — The writer who heard the shots

Victor Hugo was born in Besançon in 1802, the son of a general in Napoleon's army. As a young man he was a committed royalist; over the decades he became a passionate republican. On 5 June 1832, according to his biographer Graham Robb, he was writing a play in the Tuileries Gardens when he heard gunfire. The park-keeper had to unlock the gate to let him out. Instead of going home, Hugo followed the sound — into a narrow passage near Les Halles, where the iron gates at both ends were slammed shut. He took shelter between some columns while, for a quarter of an hour, bullets flew both ways.

He did not begin writing the novel until 1845, and it was not finished for many years. In 1851 Louis Napoleon seized complete power, and Hugo publicly called him a traitor to France. He left — first for Brussels, then for the island of Jersey, from which he was expelled, and finally, in October 1855, for Guernsey. There he bought Hauteville House, paid for by the success of his poetry, and stayed until 1870. In 1859 the new emperor offered an amnesty to political exiles. Hugo refused it: accepting would have meant softening his criticism.

It was in this self-imposed exile that the great novel was completed; in 1861 he visited the battlefield of Waterloo, and finished writing it there. When Les Misérables appeared in 1862 — first in Belgium, in instalments that sold out — the critics were mostly hostile. Flaubert found in it “neither truth nor greatness”. Ordinary readers disagreed.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What happened to Hugo on 5 June 1832?

2. Why did Hugo leave France, and why did he refuse to come back in 1859?

1. He was writing in the Tuileries Gardens, heard gunfire, followed it and was trapped in a passage between closed gates, sheltering between columns while bullets flew for a quarter of an hour.

2. He called Louis Napoleon a traitor after the seizure of power in 1851 and went into exile. He refused the 1859 amnesty because accepting it would have meant limiting his criticism of the government.

Discuss:
  • Hugo could have gone home in 1859 and chose not to. Is refusing a compromise always admirable — or can it also be a kind of pride?

Part 3 — Utopia today, flesh and blood tomorrow

The rising Hugo describes really happened, and it was not the famous revolution of 1789 — a mistake many viewers of the musical still make. In 1830 one king had been replaced by another, Louis-Philippe, and many republicans felt their revolution had been stolen. In the spring of 1832, cholera killed 18,402 people in Paris alone. On 1 June it killed General Lamarque, a general popular with the poor. At his funeral on 5 June, a red flag reading La Liberté ou la Mort — Liberty or Death — was raised, and shooting began.

About 3,000 insurgents held much of central and eastern Paris for one night, behind barricades in the narrow streets around the rue Saint-Martin and the rue Saint-Denis. They were heavily outnumbered by the National Guard and the regular army, and the last of them fought on at the Cloître Saint-Merry until the early evening of 6 June. Around 800 people were killed or wounded; 93 insurgents died. Most of the rebels were working-class. In the novel, Enjolras and his friends die on their barricade. The uprising failed completely.

And yet. Louis-Philippe was overthrown in 1848, though the republic that followed did not last. In 1870 the empire of Napoleon III fell, the Third Republic was proclaimed, and Hugo came home. When he died in 1885, more than two million people attended his state funeral, and he was buried in the Panthéon. A rising that most of France had forgotten became, through his novel, one of the best-known in the world. Utopia today, flesh and blood tomorrow — though not, for Enjolras and his friends, in their own lifetimes.

Quick check — answer from memory, then reveal:

1. What sparked the uprising of June 1832, and how did it end?

2. What happened in 1848 and 1870 — and why does it matter for Hugo's sentence?

1. The funeral of General Lamarque, a cholera victim, on 5 June. It ended on the evening of 6 June with the last insurgents defeated at the Cloître Saint-Merry; about 800 people were killed or wounded.

2. In 1848 Louis-Philippe was overthrown; in 1870 the empire fell and the Third Republic was proclaimed. The republic that the students dreamed of came — but decades later, without them.

Discuss:
  • Can we really say the dreamers of 1832 “created” the future, or did the future simply arrive for other reasons? What kind of evidence would you need to decide?

Grammar — the future in the past

History is full of moments where we stand in the past and look forward: Hugo was to spend fifteen years on Guernsey. English has a precise set of structures for this — and choosing the right one tells your listener whether the future was a plan, a destiny, or a near miss.

Looking forward from the past
• was / were going to + infinitive — a plan or intention, often one that didn't happen: "The rebels shouted that they were going to dine at the Tuileries Palace that night."
• would + infinitive — what later happened, seen from the earlier moment: "He would not see Paris again until 1870."
• was / were to + infinitive — formal, narrative: what was destined or arranged to happen: "The novel was to make him the most famous writer in France."
• was about to / was on the point of + -ing — something very near: "He was about to leave the gardens when he heard the shots."
Two C1 refinements
• was to have + past participle = it was planned, but it did not happen: "The rebels were to have dined at the Tuileries that night."
• was doomed to / was destined to + infinitive = the narrator knows the ending: doomed for a bad end, destined for a great one. "The rising was doomed to fail; the novel was destined to outlive its critics."

Don't mix it up: ✗ He was to spending years in exile. ✓ He was to spend years in exile. — but ✓ He was on the point of leaving. (of + -ing)

1. Complete with the right form

Use was going to · would · was to · was about to — one in each sentence. Say each sentence aloud.

1. In 1832 nobody could know that the forgotten rising become world-famous through a novel thirty years later.

2. Hugo walk home, but he followed the sound of the guns instead.

3. Hugo arrived on Guernsey in October 1855. He stay there until 1870.

4. He sat writing in the Tuileries Gardens, with no idea that he hear the first shots of the uprising.

1. would — the later fact, seen from 1832.   2. was going to — a plan that didn't happen.   3. was to — formal narrative: what the future held (would is also possible).   4. was about to — the very near future (would is also possible).

2. Which sentence is correct? Choose a, b or c

1. (a) The rebels were to have dined in the royal palace that night, but the army stopped them.   (b) The rebels were to dine in the royal palace that night, but the army stopped them.   (c) The rebels would have dine in the royal palace that night, but the army stopped them.
(a) — was to have + past participle = planned but did not happen. (b) is grammatical but suggests it did happen; (c) needs dined.
2. (a) The rising was destined to fail within two days.   (b) The rising was doomed to fail within two days.   (c) The rising was doomed failing within two days.
(b) — doomed to + infinitive for a bad ending. (a) is grammatical but odd: destined usually points to a great future.
3. (a) He was on the point to leave when he heard the guns.   (b) He was on the point of leave when he heard the guns.   (c) He was on the point of leaving when he heard the guns.
(c) — on the point of + -ing. Compare He was about to leave (infinitive).
4. (a) Hugo did not know that he will spend almost nineteen years outside France.   (b) Hugo did not know that he would spend almost nineteen years outside France.   (c) Hugo did not know that he would spent almost nineteen years outside France.
(b) — after a past verb, will moves back to would, followed by the bare infinitive.

3. Look forward from the past — write your answer first

Rewrite each sentence using the structure in brackets, keeping the meaning.

1. Hugo left France in 1851. He returned in 1870. (would)

2. The students planned to change France, but they died on the barricade. (were going to)

3. In 1862 the critics attacked the novel. Later it became one of the most famous books in the world. (was to / was destined to)

1. Hugo left France in 1851; he would not return until 1870.

2. The students were going to change France, but they died on the barricade.

3. In 1862 the critics attacked the novel, which was to become / was destined to become one of the most famous books in the world.

Check: did you use the bare infinitive after would / was to / was going to? Does not … until in 1 make the long wait clear?

You'll use it again in the Speak tab — Task C asks you to look back at your own past dreams.

Going deeper

The dates, numbers and quotations in this story come from the French and English texts of the novel and from the historical record. Put together, they make Hugo's famous sentence more interesting — and more uncomfortable — than the poster version.

Three big ideas from the story.

1. The full sentence starts with dogma. Hugo did not simply praise dreams. He said that rigid, absolute belief gives birth to dreams, and that dreams in turn give birth to the future. That is a warning as well as a celebration: the same certainty that inspires idealists can lead them onto a barricade. The poster cuts the warning off.

2. A dream can fail and still matter. The rising of 1832 lasted two days and changed nothing at the time. France did become a republic, but in 1848 and then in 1870 — for many reasons, and through many people. It is tempting to draw a straight line from the barricade to the republic. A careful historian would say the line is real but crooked, and that the dreamers on Hugo's barricade do not live to see it.

3. Quotations travel — and change on the way. “Rien n'est tel que le rêve pour engendrer l'avenir” became “nothing like dreams for engendering the future”, then “nothing like a dream to create the future”. Each step is small. The result is a line that sounds like a motivational poster, written by a man who spent almost nineteen years outside his country because he would not compromise.
Talk it through:
  • Is Hugo's sentence a celebration of dreamers, a warning about them, or both?
  • Hugo's students die for a future they never see. Is it right to call them successful?
  • Companies, politicians and schools love this quotation. Who do you think it is most useful to — and why?
  • Think of a modern idea that people today call utopian or a pipe dream. Could it be “flesh and blood tomorrow”?

Speak

Speak against the clock — and look forward from the past wherever it fits: would, was to, was going to, was about to, was doomed to.

Useful language: exile · an uprising · utopian · to suppress · posterity · an idealist · to engender · to come to fruition · a pipe dream · ahead of their time · he would never… · it was to become… · it was doomed to fail · they were to have…
Time remaining: 4:00
Task A · Tell the story (4 minutes)

Retell the story in your own words. Use these steps: the famous quote → Part Three, Book Four, Chapter One → dogma, dreams and the future → the Friends of the A B C and their pun → Hugo in the Tuileries Gardens, 5 June 1832 → the coup of 1851 and exile → Guernsey and the refused amnesty → Waterloo, 1862 and the hostile critics → cholera, Lamarque's funeral and the red flag → the last stand at Saint-Merry → 1848, 1870 and two million people at the funeral.

Use at least three future-in-the-past forms and five key words (exile, uprising, utopian, suppress, posterity, idealist, engender, come to fruition, pipe dream, ahead of their time).

Task B · Debate: dreamers or realists — who builds the future? (4 minutes)

First argue that dreamers build the future: without people who imagine something impossible, nothing changes. Then argue that realists do: the dreamers of 1832 died in two days, and it was patient, practical people who built the republic later. Finally, say what you really think — and give one example from history or from your own country.

Task C · The future I was going to have (4 minutes)

Talk about a dream you had when you were younger. What were you going to be or do? What happened instead? Is any part of that dream still alive? Use was going to, would and was (not) to to look forward from the past — "At fifteen I was going to be a pilot. I didn't know then that I would…"

Or choose one of these:

  • Choose a person from history — or from your family — whose dream came to fruition only after their death. Tell their story.
  • You are a journalist in Paris on the evening of 6 June 1832. Report what has happened — and predict, carefully, what it might mean.
  • Hugo refused to go home on the emperor's terms. Describe a time when you, or someone you know, refused a compromise. Were they right?
  • Write a better poster for this quotation — one that includes the dogma half. Then defend it.

To finish — the big questions

  1. Is there really “nothing like a dream” to create the future — or are fear, need and money stronger forces?
  2. Should we judge the dreamers of the past by whether they succeeded, or by what they hoped for?
  3. What is one dream of today that you think posterity will see as obvious — and one it will see as a mistake?
  4. Before you go — from memory: give the quote as Hugo wrote it (in French or in the 1887 English), say where it appears in the novel, and tell your teacher two things about Hugo's life using would and was to.