How a few hundred Spaniards toppled two of the greatest empires the Americas had ever known.
Need an easier version? Read this lesson at A2/B1 level →
Each new word is hidden in a sentence. Read it aloud and say what you think the bold word means from the rest of the sentence — then reveal it and see how close you were.
Read each part. After it, there's a quick comprehension check (try the questions from memory first), then one thing to discuss.
In the early 1500s, Spain had a foothold in the Caribbean and an appetite for more. Out from its islands sailed the conquistadors — adventurers, soldiers and minor noblemen, hungry for gold, land and a name. Few of them were sent by armies; most paid their own way, gambling their lives on the chance of sudden riches. Ahead of them, though they did not yet know it, lay two of the largest and most sophisticated empires on Earth.
To the north, in what is now Mexico, stood the Aztec empire, ruled from Tenochtitlan — a vast city built on a lake, with causeways, canals, markets and temples that astonished the first Europeans who saw it. Far to the south, along the spine of the Andes, the Inca empire ran for more than two thousand miles, linked by stone roads and governed with remarkable order from its capital, Cusco. Each empire ruled millions. Each could field armies the conquistadors could never hope to match in numbers.
And yet the Spanish carried advantages no local army had faced before: steel swords and armour, gunpowder weapons, war dogs, and horses — animals unknown in the Americas. They also carried something more terrible still, without even knowing it: the diseases of the Old World, against which the peoples of the Americas had no defence at all.
1. Who were the conquistadors, and what were most of them hoping to gain?
2. Name the two empires and their capital cities.
1. Spanish soldier-adventurers — mostly self-funded — chasing gold, land and fame in the Americas.
2. The Aztec empire (capital Tenochtitlan) and the Inca empire (capital Cusco).
In 1519 Hernán Cortés landed on the Mexican coast with around 500 men, sixteen horses and a few cannon. Rather than retreat, he reportedly destroyed his own ships so that no one could turn back. As he marched inland he learned the secret that would decide everything: the Aztecs were not loved by everyone they ruled. Many peoples resented them, and the city-state of Tlaxcala, after first fighting the Spanish, became their most important ally. In the end tens of thousands of indigenous warriors would march with Cortés. He also gained an interpreter, an enslaved woman the Spanish called Doña Marina (Malintzin), whose skill made negotiation — and manipulation — possible.
Cortés entered Tenochtitlan in November 1519 and was received by the emperor Moctezuma, then seized him as a hostage. For months the Spanish held the city in an uneasy grip, until the Aztecs rose against them. On the night of 30 June 1520 — remembered as La Noche Triste, "the Night of Sorrows" — the Spanish were driven out, losing perhaps half their men. It looked like the end of the conquest. It was not.
While Cortés regrouped, an invisible ally went to work. Smallpox, brought unknowingly by the Spanish, broke out in Tenochtitlan and tore through a population with no immunity. It killed vast numbers, including the new emperor, Cuitláhuac, and shattered the city's ability to fight. In 1521 Cortés returned with his indigenous allies and besieged Tenochtitlan for some ninety days, cutting off food and water. On 13 August 1521 the city fell, and with it the Aztec empire.
1. How did Cortés turn the Aztecs' own subjects to his advantage?
2. What two blows broke Tenochtitlan after La Noche Triste?
1. He allied with peoples who resented Aztec rule — above all Tlaxcala — gaining tens of thousands of warriors, plus the interpreter Malintzin.
2. A smallpox epidemic that devastated the city (killing the emperor Cuitláhuac), followed by a roughly 90-day siege that starved it into surrender in August 1521.
News of Mexico's gold sent others looking for empires of their own. Francisco Pizarro, an older and harder man who had heard rumours of a rich kingdom in the south, sailed down the Pacific coast. By the time he marched inland in 1532 with fewer than 200 men, smallpox had already raced ahead of any Spaniard, killing the Inca emperor and many of his family. The empire had then torn itself apart in a civil war between two rival brothers, Atahualpa and Huáscar. Atahualpa had just won — and walked, victorious and unsuspecting, straight into Pizarro's path.
At Cajamarca in November 1532, Atahualpa came to meet the strangers almost unarmed, with thousands of attendants but no expectation of a fight. Pizarro sprang an ambush. Spanish guns, steel and cavalry caused panic and slaughter in the square, and Atahualpa was taken prisoner. To win his freedom, the emperor offered a staggering ransom: a room filled once with gold and twice with silver. The Spanish accepted, melted the treasure down — and then, having taken it all, accused him of crimes and executed him in 1533.
With the emperor dead and the empire leaderless, Pizarro marched on Cusco and took it later that year. Resistance went on for decades in the mountains, but the heart of the Inca empire had been seized by a few hundred men. Pizarro's own end came in his own coin: in 1541 he was assassinated in Lima by fellow Spaniards in a bitter quarrel over the spoils.
1. What weakened the Inca empire even before Pizarro reached it?
2. What happened to Atahualpa after he paid his ransom?
1. Smallpox had killed the emperor and many others, and a civil war between the rival brothers Atahualpa and Huáscar had split the empire.
2. Despite handing over a room of gold and silver, he was accused of crimes and executed by the Spanish in 1533.
For Spain, the rewards were almost beyond counting. Ships carried home gold and silver in quantities that reshaped the European economy and made Spain, for a time, the most powerful nation in the world. A new empire — "New Spain" — spread across Mexico, Central America and much of South America, bringing the Spanish language and the Catholic faith that still mark the region today.
For the peoples of the Americas, the same century was a catastrophe with few equals in human history. The wars were brutal, but the diseases were worse: smallpox, measles, influenza and others swept the continent again and again, against bodies that had never met them. Across the Americas, indigenous populations are estimated to have collapsed by anywhere from a half to as much as ninety per cent in the generations after contact. Whole peoples were plundered, enslaved and forced to labour in mines and fields. Empires that had built lake-cities and mountain roads were broken in a few short years.
It is tempting to tell this as a tale of a few daring men and their swords. The truth is harder and stranger. The conquistadors were ruthless and bold, but they did not win on courage alone. They won because they found enemies of the empires willing to fight beside them, because steel and horses gave them a battlefield edge — and, above all, because an invisible plague went ahead of them, emptying the land before they ever raised a sword.
1. What did the conquest bring Spain and Europe?
2. According to the story, what were the three real reasons the conquistadors won?
1. Enormous wealth in gold and silver, a huge new empire, and the lasting spread of the Spanish language and Catholic faith across the region.
2. Indigenous allies who hated the ruling empires; a military edge in steel, guns and horses; and — above all — disease, especially smallpox, which devastated the population in advance.
This whole story turns on uneven comparisons — a few hundred against many thousands, steel against stone, one weapon far deadlier than all the rest. English has a precise set of phrases for saying how equal or unequal two things are. Get them right and your comparison lands exactly where you want it.
Complete each gap with one of: every bit as, no less, nowhere near as, not nearly as, the same … as.
1. The conquistadors were numerous as the armies they faced — yet just as bold.
2. Pizarro proved ruthless as Cortés before him.
3. To the empires, the invisible plague was dangerous than any sword.
4. Atahualpa walked in with confidence a man who feared nothing.
1. nowhere near as (or: not nearly as — a big gap in numbers)
2. every bit as (fully equal, emphatic)
3. no less (equally dangerous — "no less dangerous than")
4. the same … as ("the same confidence as")
Rewrite each sentence, adding far or by far to strengthen the comparison. (Write the new sentence on the line.)
1. Steel armour was more effective than cotton padding. →
2. Smallpox was the most destructive force of the whole conquest. →
3. Tenochtitlan was larger than most European cities of the day. →
1. Steel armour was far more effective than cotton padding.
2. Smallpox was by far the most destructive force of the whole conquest. (by far + superlative)
3. Tenochtitlan was far larger than most European cities of the day.
Use the phrase in brackets to write one true sentence about the story. Read each aloud once you've finished.
1. (nowhere near as … as)
2. (every bit as … as)
3. (no less … than)
4. (by far the …)
1. The Spanish were nowhere near as numerous as the Aztec armies.
2. Pizarro was every bit as ruthless as Cortés.
3. Disease was no less deadly than the conquistadors' steel.
4. Smallpox was by far the deadliest force of the conquest.
Your own wording may differ — check that the comparison phrase is used correctly.
Hold on to these phrases — you'll need them in the Speak tab, where so much of the story is about how unequal two sides really were.
You've read the story and you have the words — so now the real thing is within reach. There's a full podcast episode that tells this story in much greater depth, in natural, real-speed English. It's optional: the lesson stands on its own without it.
From the Noiser podcast network. Hosted by historians, roughly 50 minutes. It plays in the page on the Noiser site, or search "Short History Of The Conquistadors" on Spotify.
Play on Noiser →Prefer Spotify? Open the show and find the Conquistadors episode.
This is the heart of the lesson — do all of it out loud. The timer is there to keep you going: fill the time with detail rather than escaping it.
Tell the story of the conquistadors in your own words, as if to someone who has never heard it. Move through the arc: a handful of Spaniards meeting two huge empires → Cortés, his indigenous allies and the fall of Tenochtitlan → Pizarro, the trap at Cajamarca and the fall of the Incas → what the conquest left behind, for Spain and for the Americas.
Use at least three comparison phrases (every bit as / nowhere near as / not nearly as / no less … than / the same … as) and work in at least five key words (conquistador, empire, conquest, alliance, overthrow, cavalry, intermediary, plunder, contagion, ruthless).
Three forces brought the empires down: indigenous allies, military technology, and disease. Rank them. Which was by far the most decisive, and which was nowhere near as important as people often think? Build an argument and defend it, comparing the three openly.
Tell a story — true or from the wider world — of two sides that were deeply unequal, and what happened. Use the comparison phrases to make the gap vivid: who was nowhere near as strong, who turned out every bit as determined.
Stuck for an idea? Pick one of these and run with it: